Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
Zeitschriften PflegeKolleg Akademie Hebammen Bücher Kongresse & Live-Webinare
Social Media - Folgen Sie uns!
Instagram Facebook Instagram Hebammen
Service
Jobbörse Web-App Kundenservice Info & Hilfe
Fokus-Themen
Chronisch-entzündliche Darmerkrankung COVID-19-Update Diabetes Hautpflege Klima & Gesundheit Hygiene Intensivpflege Kardiologische Pflege Mobilisation Nachhaltigkeit Nierenerkrankungen Obstipation Onkologische Pflege Palliativpflege Schmerz Sucht in der Pflege Vielfalt, Gleichberechtigung und Inklusion
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Erschienen in:
Lernpsychologische Grundlagen Kapitel lesen Erstes Kapitel lesen

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

6. Prüfungen

verfasst von : Thomas Kollewe, Monika Sennekamp, Falk Ochsendorf

Erschienen in: Medizindidaktik

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Prüfungen erfüllen aus didaktischer Sicht wichtige Funktionen. Besonders hervorzuheben ist deren Einfluss auf das Lernen („assessment drives learning“). Nach der Darstellung der Anforderungen an Prüfungen aus messtheoretischer Sicht sowie der Prüfungsplanung werden die einzelnen Prüfungsformate (schriftlich, mündlich, praktisch) dargestellt. Ein besonderes Augenmerk liegt dabei auf den Multiple-Choice-Fragen, die charakteristisch für das Medizinstudium sind. Es werden Tipps für die Formulierung guter Fragen sowie Hinweise zu deren Wiederverwendung gegeben. Mit dem „Key-Feature-Problem“ und dem „Script Concordance Test“ werden weitere Möglichkeiten der schriftlichen Prüfung beschrieben. Im Teil zu den mündlichen Prüfungen werden Einflussfaktoren auf die Bewertung und Anregungen für die generelle Verbesserung betrachtet. Hinsichtlich der praktischen Prüfungen werden neben der Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) auch Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt, wie Prüfungen im Rahmen der klinischen Tätigkeit durchgeführt werden können.
Vorheriges Kapitel Kommunikation und Feedback
Nächstes Kapitel Evaluation der Lehre
Literatur
Beyer A, Dreier A, Kirschner S, Hoffmann W (2016) Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) als kompetenz-orientiertes Prüfungsinstrument in der pflegerischen Erstausbildung. Pflege 29:193–203CrossRefPubMed
Bodle JF, Kaufmann SJ, Bisson D et al. (2008) Value and face validity of objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for work based assessment of surgical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. Med Teach 30:212–216CrossRefPubMed
Bok HGJ, Teunissen PW, Favier RP et al. (2013) Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice. BMC Med Educ 13:123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Brannick MT, Erol-Korkmaz HT, Prewett M (2011) A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores. Med Educ 45:1181–1189CrossRefPubMed
Buckley S, Coleman J, Davison I et al. (2009) The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11. Med Teach 31:282–298CrossRefPubMed
Case SM, Swanson DB (1993) Extended-matching items: A practical alternative to free-response questions. Teach Learn Med 5:107–115CrossRef
Case SM, Swanson DB (2002) Constructing Written Test Questions For the Basic and Clinical Sciences. National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME)
Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C et al. (2000) The Script Concordance Test: A Tool to Assess the Reflective Clinician. Teach Learn Med 12:189–195CrossRefPubMed
Cömert M, Zill JM, Christalle E et al. (2016) Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) – A Systematic Review of Rating Scales. PLoS One 11:e0152717
Dannefer EF, Henson LC (2007) The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine. Acad Med 82:493–502CrossRefPubMed
Dijkstra J, Galbraith R, Hodges BD et al. (2012) Expert validation of fit-for-purpose guidelines for designing programmes of assessment. BMC Med Educ 12:20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Donato AA, George DL (2012) A blueprint for implementation of a structured portfolio in an internal medicine residency. Acad Med 87:185–191CrossRefPubMed
Dong T, Swygert KA, Durning SJ et al. (2014) Validity evidence for medical school OSCEs: associations with USMLE{\circledR} step assessments. Teach Learn Med 26:379–386CrossRefPubMed
Dory V, Gagnon R, Vanpee D, Charlin B (2012) How to construct and implement script concordance tests: Insights from a systematic review. Med Educ 46:552–563CrossRefPubMed
Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Vermunt JD, van der Vleuten CPM (2003) Use of portfolios in early undergraduate medical training. Med Teach 25:18–23CrossRefPubMed
Driessen EW, van Tartwijk J, Overeem K et al. (2005) Conditions for successful reflective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 39:1230–1235CrossRefPubMed
Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten C, Wass V (2007a) Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ 41:1224–1233CrossRefPubMed
Driessen EW, Muijtjens AMM, van Tartwijk J, van der Vleuten CPM (2007b) Web- or paper-based portfolios: is there a difference? Med Educ 41:1067–1073CrossRefPubMed
Driessen EW, Van Tartwijk J, Govaerts M et al. (2012) The use of programmatic assessment in the clinical workplace: a Maastricht case report. Med Teach 34:226–231CrossRefPubMed
Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Markert RJ, Pangaro LN (2002) Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med 77:900–904CrossRefPubMed
Fabry G (2008) Medizindidaktik. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern
Fischer MR, Kopp V, Holzer M et al. (2005) A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities. Med Teach 27:450–455CrossRefPubMed
Friedman Ben-David M (2000) Standard setting in student assessment. Med Teach 22:120–130CrossRef
Gleeson F (2009) AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 9. Assessment of clinical competence using the Objective Structured Long Examination Record (OSLER). Med Teach 19:7–14CrossRef
Guttormsen S, Beyeler C, Bonvin R et al. (2013) The new licencing examination for human medicine: from concept to implementation. Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13897
Häcker TH (2011) Portfolio: ein Entwicklungsinstrument für selbstbestimmtes Lernen: Eine explorative Studie zur Arbeit mit Portfolios in der Sekundarstufe I, 3., unveränd. Aufl. Schneider-Verl, Hohengehren, Baltmannsweiler
Hakstian AR (1971) The effects of type of examination anticipated on test preparation and performance. J Educ Res 64:319–324CrossRef
Harden RM (1990) Twelve tips for organizing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Med Teach 12:259–264CrossRefPubMed
Harden RM, Gleeson FA (1979) Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Eucation 13:41–54
Harrison C, Wass V (2016) The challenge of changing to an assessment for learning culture. Med Educ 50:702–708CrossRef
Hawkins RE, Margolis MJ, Durning SJ, Norcini JJ (2010) Constructing a validity argument for the mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise: a review of the research. Acad Med 85:1453–1461CrossRefPubMed
Hift RJ (2014) Should essays and other „open-ended“-type questions retain a place in written summative assessment in clinical medicine? BMC Med Educ 14:249CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hodges BD, Hollenberg E, McNaughton N et al. (2014) The Psychiatry OSCE: a 20-year retrospective. Acad Psychiatry 38:26–34CrossRefPubMed
Hrynchak P, Glover Takahashi S, Nayer M (2014) Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: A literature review. Med Educ 48:870–883CrossRefPubMed
Huber-Lang M, Palmer A, Grab C et al. (2017) Visions and reality: the idea of competence-oriented assessment for German medical students is not yet realised in licensing examinations. GMS J Med Educ 34:Doc25
Kelava A, Moosbrugger H (2012) Deskriptivstatistische Evaluation von Items (Itemanalyse) und Testwertverteilungen. In: Moosbrugger H, Kelava A (Hrsg) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 75–102
Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA (2002) Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students’ clinical skills. Acad Med 77:1156–1157CrossRefPubMed
Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE (2009) Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA 302:1316–1326CrossRefPubMed
Kopp V, Möltner A, Fischer MR (2006) Key-Feature-Probleme zum Prüfen von prozeduralem Wissen: Ein Praxisleitfaden. GMS Z Med Ausbild 23:Doc50
Krebs R (2004) Anleitung zur Herstellung von MC-Fragen und MC-Prüfungen für die ärztliche Ausbildung. Institut für Medizinische Lehre, Abteilung für Assessment und Evaluation, Universität Bern
Lee V, Brain K, Martin J (2017) Factors Influencing Mini-CEX Rater Judgments and Their Practical Implications: A Systematic Literature Review. Acad Med 92:880–887CrossRefPubMed
Lineberry M, Kreiter CD, Bordage G (2013) Threats to validity in the use and interpretation of script concordance test scores. Med Educ 47:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed
Little-Wienert K, Mazziotti M (2017) Twelve tips for creating an academic teaching portfolio. Med Teach, Aug 17 2017, pp 1–5
Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R et al. (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84:273–278CrossRefPubMed
Möltner A, Schellberg D, Jünger J (2006) Grundlegende quantitative Analysen medizinischer Prüfungen. Basic quantitative analyses of medical examinations. GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung 23:Doc53
Moonen-van Loon JMW, Overeem K, Donkers HHLM et al. (2013) Composite reliability of a workplace-based assessment toolbox for postgraduate medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 18:1087–1102CrossRefPubMed
Moosbrugger H, Kelava A (2012) Qualitätsanforderungen an einen psychologischen Test (Testgütekriterien). In: Moosbrugger H, Kelava A (Hrsg) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 7–26
Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR (1995) The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 123:795–799CrossRefPubMed
Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Duffy FD, Fortna GS (2003) The mini-CEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 138:476–481CrossRefPubMed
O’Brien CL, Sanguino SM, Thomas JX, Green MM (2016) Feasibility and Outcomes of Implementing a Portfolio Assessment System Alongside a Traditional Grading System. Acad Med 91:1554–1560CrossRefPubMed
O’Brien CL, Thomas JX, Green MM (2018) What Is the Relationship Between a Preclerkship Portfolio Review and Later Performance in Clerkships? Academic Medicine. 93(1):113–118CrossRefPubMed
Patterson F, Zibarras L, Ashworth V (2016) Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100. Med Teach 38:3–17CrossRefPubMed
Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T (2010) How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49. Med Teach 32:802–811CrossRefPubMed
Preusche I, Schmidts M, Wagner-Menghin M (2012) Twelve tips for designing and implementing a structured rater training in OSCEs. Med Teach 34:368–372CrossRefPubMed
Pugh D, Bhanji F, Cole G et al. (2016) Do OSCE progress test scores predict performance in a national high-stakes examination? Med Educ 50:351–358CrossRefPubMed
Rodriguez MC (2005) Three Options Are Optimal for Multiple-Choice Items: A Meta-Analysis of 80 Years of Research. Educ Meas Issues Pract 24:3–13CrossRef
Ruesseler M, Weinlich M, Byhahn C et al. (2010) Increased authenticity in practical assessment using emergency case OSCE stations. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15:81–95CrossRefPubMed
Schermelleh-Engel K, Werner CS (2012) Methoden der Reliabilitätsbestimmung. In: Moosbrugger H, Kelava A (Hrsg) Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, S 119–141
Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J et al. (2017a) Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam – a study at five medical schools. BMC Med Educ 17:71
Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J et al. (2017b) Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluation of practical skills at different medical faculties. Ann Anat 212:55–60CrossRefPubMed
Schrauth M, Riessen R, Wirtz TSH et al. (2005) Praktische Prüfungen sind machbar. Medizinische Ausbildung 22:20–22
Schuwirth L, Ash J (2013) Assessing tomorrow’s learners: in competency-based education only a radical different holistic method of assessment will work. Six things we could forget. Med Teach 35:555–559CrossRefPubMed
Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C (2004) Different written assessment methods: What can be said about their strengths and weakness? Med Educ 38:974–979CrossRefPubMed
Scouller K (1998) The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High Educ 35(4):453–472CrossRef
Shepard LA (2000) The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. 29:4–14
Surry LT, Torre D, Durning SJ (2017) Exploring examinee behaviours as validity evidence for multiple-choice question examinations. Med Educ 51(10):1075–1085CrossRefPubMed
Thomann LC (2011) Portfolio im Modellstudiengang Medizin der RWTH Aachen – Intention bei Einführung, Statusanalyse und Ermittlung der studentischen Anforderungen zur Implementierung eines elektronischen Portfolios. Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen
Tigelaar DEH, Dolmans DHJM, Grave WS et al. (2006) Participants’ opinions on the usefulness of a teaching portfolio. Med Educ 40:371–378CrossRefPubMed
Traynor M, Galanouli D, Rice B, Lynn F (2016) Evaluating the objective structured long examination record for nurse education. Br J Nurs 25:681–687CrossRefPubMed
van der Vleuten CPM (1996) The Assessment of Professional Competence: Developments, Research and Practical Implications. Adv Heal Sci Educ 1:41–67
van der Vleuten CPM (2016) Revisiting „Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes“. Med Educ 50:885–888CrossRefPubMed
van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT (2005) Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 39:309–317CrossRefPubMed
van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, Driessen EW, Govaerts M (2015) Twelve Tips for programmatic assessment. Med Teach 37:641–646
Wass V, Jones R, van der Vleuten C (2001a) Standardized or real patients to test clinical competence? The long case revisited. Med Educ 35:321–325CrossRefPubMed
Wass V, van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R (2001b) Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 357:945–949CrossRef
Webb TP, Merkley TR (2012) An evaluation of the success of a surgical resident learning portfolio. J Surg Educ 69:1–7CrossRefPubMed
Wiliam D (2011) What is assessment for learning? Stud Educ Eval 37:3–14CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prüfungen
verfasst von
Thomas Kollewe
Monika Sennekamp
Falk Ochsendorf
Copyright-Jahr
2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch
Medizindidaktik

Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56304-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56305-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56305-2_6