nach oben

Erschienen in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Buchkapitel

4. Lehrformen

verfasst von : Falk Ochsendorf, Monika Sennekamp, Thomas Kollewe

Erschienen in: Medizindidaktik

Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Zusammenfassung

Lehre findet in verschiedenen Formaten statt. In diesem Kapitel werden die Charakteristika, die Vor- und Nachteile, die Strukturierung sowie die konkrete Umsetzung des Unterrichts in den einzelnen Formaten dargestellt. Für Vorlesungen werden Stärken, Schwächen und Optimierungsmögichkeiten besprochen. Für Seminare werden Anregungen zur Teilnehmeraktivierung gegeben. Für den Unterricht am Krankenbett werden erfolgreiche Ablaufschemata vorgestellt. Für die Lehre im klinischen Alltag werden konkrete Umsetzungskonzepte präsentiert (One Minute Teacher, SNAPPS, MiPLAN), inklusive Anregungen zur Vermittlung praktischer Fertigkeiten (Peyton, mentales Training, Simulationen, standardisierte Patienten). Die Ziele naturwissenschaftlicher Praktika werden diskutiert. Das Grundkonzept des problemorientierten Lernens (POL/PBL) sowie der mögliche Einsatz digitaler Medien werden vorgestellt.

Vorheriges Kapitel Rahmenbedingungen von Lehre

Nächstes Kapitel Kommunikation und Feedback

Barangard H, Afshari P, Abedi P (2016) The effect of the SNAPPS (summarize, narrow, analyze, probe, plan, and select) method versus teacher-centered education on the clinical gynecology skills of midwifery students in Iran. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions 13:41CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Barnes NR (1983) A comparison of alternative techniques of instruction. South African Journal of Psychology 13:6–9CrossRef

Barrows HS (1993) An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 68:443–51; discussion 451–3CrossRef

Bassey M (1968) Learning methods in tertiary education. Nottingham Regional College of Technology. Internal paper, 46f

Bartlett M, Gay SP, Kinston R, McKinley R (2017) Taking on the doctor role in whole-task simulation. The Clinical Teacher 14: 1–4CrossRef

Berendt B (Hrsg) (2002–2015) Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre; Lehren und Lernen effizient gestalten. Raabe, Berlin

Bhaisare R, Kamble B (2016) Impact of utilisation of uncompleted handouts on power point presentations (PPT) in rural Indian medical institute. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism 4:145–149

Blasberg R, Haage H, Kroemer HK (Hrsg) (2013) Approbationsordnung für Ärzte; Stand zum 1. Januar 2014 unter Einbezug der Änderungsverordnungen von 2012 und 2013: Testfassungen, tabellarische Übersicht, Erläuterungen. MFT, Berlin

Bligh DA (2000) Whatʼs the use of lectures? Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG (1992) On the Role of Biomedical Knowledge in Clinical Reasoning by Experts, Intermediates and Novices. Cognitive Science 16:153–184CrossRef

Bosse HM, Schultz J-H, Nickel M, Lutz T, Möltner A, Jünger J, Huwendiek S, Nikendei C (2012) The effect of using standardized patients or peer role play on ratings of undergraduate communication training: a randomized controlled trial. Patient education and counseling 87:300–306CrossRefPubMed

Bosse HM, Nickel M, Huwendiek S, Schultz JH, Nikendei C (2015) Cost-effectiveness of peer role play and standardized patients in undergraduate communication training. BMC medical education 15:183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Broadbent DE (1970) Review lecture. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Vol. 1 175 B:333–350

Brown G, Manogue M (2001) AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22; Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Medical teacher 23:231–244CrossRefPubMed

Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJ, Feltovich PJ (2007) Scripts and clinical reasoning. Medical education 41:1178–1184CrossRefPubMed

Chen R, Grierson LE, Norman GR (2015) Evaluating the impact of high- and low-fidelity instruction in the development of auscultation skills. Medical education 49:276–285CrossRefPubMed

Cook DA (2014) How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Medical education 48:750–760CrossRefPubMed

Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM (2008) Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis. JAMA 300:1181–1196CrossRefPubMed

Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ (2011) Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 306:978–988PubMed

Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hatala R (2012) Comparative effectiveness of technology-enhanced simulation versus other instructional methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 7:308–320CrossRef

Copeland HL, Longworth DL, Hewson MG, Stoller JK (2000) Successful lecturing; A prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture. Journal of general internal medicine 15:366–371CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Custers EJFM (2010) Long-term retention of basic science knowledge; A review study. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice 15:109–128CrossRef

Custers EJFM, ten Cate OTJ (2011) Very long-term retention of basic science knowledge in doctors after graduation. Medical education 45:422–430CrossRefPubMed

Davidson R, Duerson M, Rathe R, Pauly R, Watson RT (2001) Using standardized patients as teachers: a concurrent controlled trial. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 76:840–843CrossRef

Diesen DL, Erhunmwunsee L, Bennett KM, Ben-David K, Yurcisin B, Ceppa EP, Omotosho PA, Perez A, Pryor A (2011) Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices. Journal of surgical education 68:282–289CrossRefPubMed

Dobkin PL, Laliberté V (2014) Being a mindful clinical teacher; Can mindfulness enhance education in a clinical setting? Medical teacher 36:347–352CrossRefPubMed

Eldred-Evans D, Grange P, Cheang A, Yamamoto H, Ayis S, Mulla M, Immenroth M, Sharma D, Reedy G (2013) Using the mind as a simulator: a randomized controlled trial of mental training. Journal of surgical education 70:544–551CrossRefPubMed

Elisabeth C, Christine W-H, Ewa P (2009) Teaching during clinical practice; Strategies and techniques used by preceptors in nursing education. Nurse education today 29:522–526CrossRefPubMed

Errichetti A, Boulet JR (2006) Comparing traditional and computer-based training methods for standardized patients. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 81:S91-4CrossRef

Estai M, Bunt S (2016) Best teaching practices in anatomy education. A critical review. Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger: official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft 208:151–157CrossRef

Fabry G (2008) Medizindidaktik; Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Huber, Bern

Fletcher KE, Stern DT, White C, Gruppen LD, Oh MS, Cimmino VM (2004) The physical examination of patients with abdominal pain: the long-term effect of adding standardized patients and small-group feedback to a lecture presentation. Teaching and learning in medicine 16:171–174CrossRefPubMed

Frenkel MO, Maltese S, Schankin A (2012) Befunde aus EEG-Untersuchungen zum Mentalen Training. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie 19:16–25CrossRef

Gage NL, Berliner DC (1996) Pädagogische Psychologie. Beltz, PsychologieVerlagsUnion, Weinheim

Giovanni D de, Roberts T, Norman G (2009) Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Medical education 43:661–668CrossRefPubMed

Gradl-Dietsch G, Lübke C, Horst K, Simon M, Modabber A, Sönmez TT, Münker R, Nebelung S, Knobe M (2016) Peytonʼs four-step approach for teaching complex spinal manipulation techniques – a prospective randomized trial. BMC medical education 16:284CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Griesinger W (1848/1849) Referat über das medicinische Unterrichts- und Prüfungswesen in Würtemberg. August Hirschwald, Berlin, S 149–170

Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA (2014) Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 89:387–392CrossRef

Heard JK, Cantrell M, Presher L, Klimberg VS, San Pedro GS, Erwin DO (1995) Using standardized patients to teach breast evaluation to sophomore medical students. Journal of cancer education: the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education 10:191–194

Hendrickx K, Winter B de, Tjalma W, Avonts D, Peeraer G, Wyndaele J-J (2009) Learning intimate examinations with simulated patients: the evaluation of medical studentsʼ performance. Medical teacher 31:e139–147CrossRefPubMed

Herbstreit F, Merse S, Schnell R, Noack M, Dirkmann D, Besuch A, Peters J (2017) Impact of standardized patients on the training of medical students to manage emergencies. Medicine 96:e5933CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hochschulforum Digitalisierung (2015) 20 Thesen zur Digitalisierung der Ho 20 Thesen zur Digitalisierung der Hochschulbildung. Arbeitspapier Nr. 14. Edition Stifterverband Verwaltungsgesellschaft Wirtschaftspflege, Essen

Ilgen JS, Sherbino J, Cook DA (2013) Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic emergency medicine: official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 20:117–127CrossRef

Janicik RW, Fletcher KE (2003) Teaching at the bedside; A new model. Medical teacher 25:127–130CrossRefPubMed

Jayakumar N (2017) Bedside teaching with unwell patients: Can it ever be appropriate? Medical teacher 39:323–324CrossRefPubMed

Kaplonyi J, Bowles K-A, Nestel D, Kiegaldie D, Maloney S, Haines T, Williams C (2017) Understanding the impact of simulated patients on health care learners' communication skills: a systematic review. Medical educationCrossRefPubMed

Kennedy CC, Cannon EK, Warner DO, Cook DA (2014) Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical care medicine 42:169–178CrossRefPubMed

Kim SH, Lee YH, Yoo HB, Park JH (2012) Job analysis of standardized patient trainer. Korean journal of medical education 24:39–53CrossRefPubMed

Klomp HJ, Eberhard J, Hren S, Hedderich J, Schmidt HG (2009) The role of pathophysiological explanations in clinical case representations of dental students and experts. European journal of dental education: official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe 13:58–65CrossRef

Koens F, Custers EJFM, ten Cate OTJ (2006) Clinical and basic science teachers' opinions about the required depth of biomedical knowledge for medical students. Medical teacher 28:234–238CrossRefPubMed

Krautter M, Weyrich P, Schultz J-H, Buss SJ, Maatouk I, Jünger J, Nikendei C (2011) Effects of Peyton's four-step approach on objective performance measures in technical skills training: a controlled trial. Teaching and learning in medicine 23:244–250CrossRefPubMed

Krautter M, Dittrich R, Safi A, Krautter J, Maatouk I, Moeltner A, Herzog W, Nikendei C (2015) Peyton's four-step approach: differential effects of single instructional steps on procedural and memory performance - a clarification study. Advances in medical education and practice 6:399–406CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kroenke K (1991) Handouts; Making the lecture portable. Medical teacher 13:199–203CrossRefPubMed

Krüger-Brand HE (2002) E-Learning in der Medizin: vor dem Durchbruch. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 99:A1491–1493

LeBaron S (2004) Can the future of medicine be saved from the success of science? Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 79:661–665CrossRef

Lempp HK (2005) Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school; Beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study. Medical education 39:318–325PubMed

Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN (2016) Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspectives on medical education 5:147–153CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN (2017) Examining the effect of self-explanation on cognitive integration of basic and clinical sciences in novices. Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice 22:1071–1083CrossRef

Lorello GR, Cook DA, Johnson RL, Brydges R (2014) Simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of anaesthesia 112:231–245CrossRefPubMed

Luscombe C, Montgomery J (2016) Exploring medical student learning in the large group teaching environment; Examining current practice to inform curricular development. BMC medical education 16:184CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lycke KH, Grottum P, Stromso HI (2006) Student learning strategies, mental models and learning outcomes in problem-based and traditional curricula in medicine. Medical teacher 28:717–722CrossRefPubMed

Marks LE, Miller GA (1964) The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in the memorisation of English sentences. J Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 3:1–5CrossRef

Marlow N, Altree M, Babidge W, Field J, Hewett P, Maddern GJ (2014) Laparoscopic skills acquisition: a study of simulation and traditional training. ANZ journal of surgery 84:976–980CrossRefPubMed

McGee SR, Irby DM (1997) Teaching in the outpatient clinic. Practical tips. Journal of general internal medicine 12, Suppl 2:S34-40CrossRefPubMed

McKinney J, Cook DA, Wood D, Hatala R (2013) Simulation-based training for cardiac auscultation skills: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of general internal medicine 28:283–291CrossRefPubMed

McQueen W (1994) Improving graduate students performance in cognitive assessment. The saga continues. Professional Psychology Research and Practice 25:283–287CrossRef

Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM (2014) The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological science 25:1159–1168CrossRefPubMed

Mulla M, Sharma D, Moghul M, Kailani O, Dockery J, Ayis S, Grange P (2012) Learning basic laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled study comparing box trainer, virtual reality simulator, and mental training. Journal of surgical education 69:190–195CrossRefPubMed

Münster T, Stosch C, Hindrichs N, Franklin J, Matthes J (2016) Peyton's 4-Steps-Approach in comparison: Medium-term effects on learning external chest compression – a pilot study. GMS journal for medical education 33:Doc60

Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ (1997) Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Medical education 31:341–346CrossRefPubMed

Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ (1998) Impediments to bed-side teaching. Medical education 32:159–162CrossRefPubMed

Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N (1992) A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 5:419–424PubMed

Nikendei C, Huber J, Stiepak J, Huhn D, Lauter J, Herzog W, Jünger J, Krautter M (2014) Modification of Peyton's four-step approach for small group teaching – a descriptive study. BMC medical education 14:68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L (2012) The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Medical education 46:636–647CrossRefPubMed

Norman GR, Schmidt HG (1992) The psychological basis of problem-based learning; A review of the evidence. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 67:557–565CrossRef

Park JH, Son JY, Kim S, May W (2011) Effect of feedback from standardized patients on medical students' performance and perceptions of the neurological examination. Medical teacher 33:1005–1010CrossRefPubMed

Patel VL, Groen GJ, Norman GR (1991) Effects of conventional and problem-based medical curricula on problem solving. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 66:380–389CrossRef

Plaksin J, Nicholson J, Kundrod S, Zabar S, Kalet A, Altshuler L (2016) The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature. The patient 9:15–25CrossRefPubMed

Pottier P, Dejoie T, Hardouin JB, Le Loupp AG, Planchon B, Bonnaud A, Leblanc VR (2013) Effect of stress on clinical reasoning during simulated ambulatory consultations. Medical teacher 35:472–480CrossRefPubMed

Prabhu V, Sahoo S, Soe HHK (2015) Effectiveness of skeleton handouts during ophthalmology theory lectures for undergraduate medical students. International journal of applied & basic medical research 5:S29–31CrossRef

Ramani S (2003) Twelve tips to improve bedside teaching. Medical teacher 25:112–115CrossRefPubMed

Ramani S, Orlander JD (2013) Human dimensions in bedside teaching; Focus group discussions of teachers and learners. Teaching and learning in medicine 25:312–318CrossRefPubMed

Rikers, Schmidt, Boshuizen (2000) Knowledge Encapsulation and the Intermediate Effect. Contemporary educational psychology 25:150–166CrossRefPubMed

Romero P, Gu Nther P, Kowalewski K-F, Friedrich M, Schmidt MW, Trent SM, La Garza JR de, Mu Ller-Stich BP, Nickel F (2017) Halsted's “See One, Do One, and Teach One” versus Peyton's Four-Step Approach: A Randomized Trial for Training of Laparoscopic Suturing and Knot Tying. Journal of surgical education 17 (article in press). DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.025

Russell IJ, Caris TN, Harris GD, Hendricson WD (1983) Effects of three types of lecture notes on medical student achievement. Journal of medical education 58:627–636PubMed

Schecker H, Neumann K, Theyßen H, Eickhorst B, Dickmann M (2016) Stufen experimenteller Kompetenz. ZfDN 22:197–213CrossRef

Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Introducing the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator: toward a revolution in surgical education. Surgical technology international 11:32–36PubMed

Seago BL, Ketchum JM, Willett RM (2012) Pelvic examination skills training with genital teaching associates and a pelvic simulator: does sequence matter? Simulation in healthcare: journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare 7:95–101CrossRef

Seki M, Otaki J, Breugelmans R, Komoda T, Nagata-Kobayashi S, Akaishi Y, Hiramoto J, Ohno I, Harada Y, Hirayama Y, Izumi M (2016) How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes? – SNAPPS and the One-Minute preceptor. BMC medical education 16:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Smith JR, Lane IF (2015) Making the Most of Five Minutes; The Clinical Teaching Moment. Journal of veterinary medical education 42:271–280CrossRefPubMed

Stickrath C, Aagaard E, Anderson M (2013) MiPLAN; A learner-centered model for bedside teaching in today's academic medical centers. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 88:322–327CrossRef

Theyssen H (2005) Didaktische Rekonstruktion eines Physikpraktikums für Medizinstudier ende. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 11:57–72

Vannatta JB, Smith KR, Crandall S, Fischer PC, Williams K (1996) Comparison of standardized patients and faculty in teaching medical interviewing. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 71:1360–1362CrossRef

Vaona A, Banzi R, Kwag KH, Rigon G, Cereda D, Pecoraro V, Tramacere I, Moja L. (2018) E-learning for health professionals.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 21;1:CD011736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858

Weatherall DJ (2006) Science in the undergraduate curriculum during the 20th century. Medical education 40:195–201CrossRefPubMed

Weitzel KW, Walters EA, Taylor J (2012) Teaching clinical problem solving; A preceptor's guide. American journal of health-system pharmacy: AJHP: official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 69:1588–1599CrossRef

Widulle W (2009) Handlungsorientiert Lernen im Studium. Arbeitsbuch für soziale und pädagogische Berufe. VS, WiesbadenCrossRef

Winteler A (2013) Professionell lehren und lernen. Ein Praxisbuch. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG), Darmstadt

Wolpaw T, Papp KK, Bordage G (2009) Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties. A randomized comparison group trial. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 84:517–524

Wolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK (2003) SNAPPS; A learner-centered model for outpatient education. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 78:893–898CrossRef

Wong SYS, Cheung AKY, Lee A, Cheung N, Leung A, Wong W, Chan K (2007) Improving general practitioners' interviewing skills in managing patients with depression and anxiety: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Medical teacher 29:e175–83CrossRefPubMed

Wongkietkachorn A, Prakoonsuksapan J, Wangsaturaka D (2014) What happens when teachers do not give students handouts? Medical teacher 36:789–793CrossRefPubMed

Woods NN (2007) Science is fundamental; The role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Medical education 41:1173–1177CrossRefPubMed

Woods NN, Brooks LR, Norman GR (2005) The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis; Creating coherence among signs and symptoms. Medical education 39:107–112CrossRefPubMed

Wragg EC (2003) How can we determine the relevance of basic sciences learning objectives to clinical practice? Medical education 37:948–949CrossRefPubMed

Wündrich M, Schwartz C, Feige B, Lemper D, Nissen C, Voderholzer U (2017) Empathy training in medical students – a randomized controlled trial. Medical teacher 39:1–3CrossRef

https://www.e-teaching.org/

https://www.e-teaching.org/projekt/politik/foerderphasen (E-Learning Förderung in Deutschland) (Zuletzt gesehen: 27. August 2017)

https://dbs-lin.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/lehreladen/ (Universität Bochum)

http://www.studiumdigitale.uni-frankfurt.de/49689206/studiumdigitale?legacy_request=1 (Universität Frankfurt)

http://l3t.tugraz.at/index.php/LehrbuchEbner10/issue/view/9/showToc (Universität Graz)

https://blog.llz.uni-halle.de/ (Universität Halle)

https://www.mmkh.de/ (Multimedia Konto Hamburg)

https://www.uni-hamburg.de/elearning.html (Universität Hamburt)

http://fakultaet.medizin.uni-ulm.de/studium-lehre/elearning/kompetenzzentrum-elearning-bw/ (Universität Ulm)

Educause Review – http://er.educause.edu/ero

E-Learning Papers – https://www.openeducationeuropa.eu/topics

First Monday – http://firstmonday.org/index

Hamburger E-Learning Magazin (2008–2015) – https://www.uni-hamburg.de/elearning/beispiele/helm/archiv.html

Horizon Report (Deutsche Übersetzung) – https://www.mmkh.de/newsmaterial/materialdownloads.html

Synergie Fachmagazin für Digitalisierung in der Lehre – https://www.synergie.uni-hamburg.de/

The Internet and Higher Education – https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-internet-and-higher-education/

Titel: Lehrformen
verfasst von: Falk Ochsendorf
Monika Sennekamp
Thomas Kollewe
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Buch: Medizindidaktik
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56304-5

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-662-56305-2

Copyright-Jahr: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56305-2_4

Springerpflege

Zusammenfassung

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten