skip to main content
10.1145/2675133.2675294acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Friendship Maintenance in the Digital Age: Applying a Relational Lens to Online Social Interaction

Published:28 February 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

HCI research has explored mobile technologies to support social activity and to support greater feelings of connectedness. Much of this has focused on different mobile devices, individual preferences and modes of use. Yet social activity and connectedness are about ongoing enactments of relationships across technologies. We propose the relational lens as a way to include a notion of relational tension in addition to individual preferences in the design and analysis of mobile communication technologies. We discuss three strategies people use to manage tensions in their relationships: selection, segmentation and integration. Our data show that use of social technologies can at times destabilize social relations and occasion relational tensions, forcing users to renegotiate how they enact these relationships.

References

  1. Altman, I. (1975) The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bales, E., Li, K. & Griwsold, W. CoupleVIBE: mobile implicit communication to improve awareness for (long-distance) couples. In Proceedings of CSCW (Hangzhou, China, 2011). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barkhuus, L. & Tashiro, J. Student socialization in the age of facebook. In Proceedings of CHI (Atlanta, Georgia, 2010). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Baxter, L. (1988) A dialectical perspective on communication strategies in relationship development. In S. Duck (Ed). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, & interventions. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter, L. (1990) Dialectical Contradictions in Relationship Development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 1, 69--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Baxter, L. (2004) Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 11, 1, 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Baxter, L. & Widenmann, S. (1993) Revealing & Not Revealing Status of Romantic Relationships to Social Networks. Jou. of Soc. & Pers. Rels, 10, 3, 321--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bazarova, N. Contents and contexts: disclosure perceptions on facebook. In Proceedings of CSCW (Seattle, Washington, 2012). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bazarova, N., Taft, J., Choi, Y. & Cosley, D. (2013) Managing Impressions and Relationships on Facebook: Self-Presentational and Relational Concerns Revealed Through the Analysis of Language Style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 32, 2, 121--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Biehl, J., Rieffel, E. & Lee, A. (2012) When privacy and utility are in harmony: towards better design of presence technologies. Personal and Ubiquitous Comput., 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Binder, J., Howes, A. & Sutcliffe, A. The problem of conflicting social spheres: Effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites. In Proceedings of CHI (Boston, MA, 2009). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. boyd, d. & Marwick, A. Social Privacy in Networked Publics: Teens' Attitudes, Practices, and Strategies. A Decade in Internet Time (Oxford, UK, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandtzæg, P., Luders, M. & Skjetne, J. (2010) Too Many Facebook "Friends"? Content Sharing & Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites. Internat. Jour. of HCIs, 26, 11--12, 1006--1030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bridge, K. & Baxter, L. (1992) Blended relationships: Friends as work associates. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 3, 200--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Burke, M., Kraut, R. & Marlow, C. Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of CHI (Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Canary, D. & Stafford, L. (1994) Maintaining relationships through strategic & routine interaction. In D. Canary & L. Stafford (Ed). Communication & relational maintenance. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Choi, B., Jiang, Z. & Yap, E. Information Sharing in Online Dyadic Exchange: A Relational Dialectic Perspective. In Proceedings of HICSS (2012). IEEE Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Consolvo, S., Smith, I., Matthews, T., Lamarca, A., Tabert, J. & Powledge, P. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of CHI (2005). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dey, A. & Guzman, E. From awareness to connected-ness: the design and deployment of presence displays. In Proceedings of CHI (Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ding, X., Erickson, T., Kellogg, W. & Patterson, D. (2012) Informing and performing: investigating how mediated sociality becomes visible. Personal Ubiquitous Comput., 16, 8, 1095--1117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2007) The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital & college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 4, 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ellison, N., Steinfield, C. & Lampe, C. (2011) Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13, 6, 873--892.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Harper, R. (2010) Texture: Human expression in the age of communications overload. MIT, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Hays, R. B. (1988) Friendship. In S. Duck (Ed). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hogan, B. (2010) The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 6, 377--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Joinson, A. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of CHI (Florence, Italy, 2008). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kaye, J. J. I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. In CHI '06 extended abstracts. ACM Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kim, K.-H. & Yun, H. (2007) Cying for Me, Cying for Us: Relational Dialectics in a Korean Social Network Site. Jour. of Comp.-Mediated Comm., 13, 1, 298--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kramer, A. & Chung, C. Dimensions of Self-Expression in Facebook Status Updates. In pro. of ICWSM (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kranz, M., Holleis, P. & Schmidt, A. (2010) Embedded Interaction: Interacting with the Internet of Things. Internet Computing, IEEE, 14, 2, 46--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lampinen, A., Lehtinen, V., Lehmuskallio, A. & Tamminen, S. We're in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services. In Proceedings of CHI (Vancouver, Canada, 2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lindtner, S., Chen, J., Hayes, G. & Dourish, P. (2011) Towards a framework of publics: Re-encountering media sharing and its user. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 18, 2, 1--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Montgomery, B. (1993) Relationship Maintenance versus Relationship Change: A Dialectical Dilemma. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 10, 2, 205--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Nguyen, D. & Hayes, G. (2010) Information privacy in institutional and end-user tracking and recording technologies. Personal & Ubiquitous Comp., 14, 1, 53--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. O'Sullivan, B. (2000) What you don't know won't hurt me. Human Communication Research, 26, 3, 403--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Palen, L. & Dourish, P. Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. In Proceedings of CHI (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA, 2003). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pempek, T., Yermolayeva, Y. & Calvert, S. (2009) College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. Jour. of App. Dev. Psych., 30, 3, 227--238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Schoenebeck, S. Y. Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media. In Proceedings of CHI (Toronto, Canada, 2014). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sigman, S. (1991) Handling discontinuous aspects of continuing social relationships: Toward research on the persistence of social forms. Comm. Theory, 1, 106--127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Smith, K. K. & Berg, D. N. (1987) Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Stutzman, F. & Hartzog, W. Boundary regulation in social media. In Proceedings of CSCW (Seattle, Washington, 2012). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Stutzman, F. & Kramer-Duffield, J. Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook. In Proceedings of CHI (Atlanta, Georgia, 2010). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Tang, K., Lin, J., Hong, J., Siewiorek, D. & Sadeh, N. Rethinking location sharing: exploring the implications of social-driven vs. purpose-driven location sharing. In Proceedings of Ubicomp (Copenhagen, DK, 2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Tollmar, K., Sandor, O. & Schömer, A. Supporting social awareness @ work design and experience. In Proceedings of CSCW (Boston, MA, 1996). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wiese, J., Kelley, P., Cranor, L., Dabbish, L., Hong, J. & Zimmerman, J. Are you close with me? are you nearby?: investigating social groups, closeness, and willingness to share. In Proceedings of Ubicomp (Beijing, China, 2011). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Zhao, X., Salehi, N., Naranjit, S., Alwaalan, S., Voida, S. & Cosley, D. The many faces of facebook: experiencing social media as performance, exhibition, and personal archive. In Proceedings of CHI (Paris, France, 2013). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Zhao, X., Sosik, V. & Cosley, D. It's complicated: how romantic partners use facebook. In Proceedings of CHI (Austin, Texas, USA, 2012) ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Friendship Maintenance in the Digital Age: Applying a Relational Lens to Online Social Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing
      February 2015
      1956 pages
      ISBN:9781450329224
      DOI:10.1145/2675133

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 February 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CSCW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate161of575submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader