skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2556983acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media use is widespread, but many people worry about overuse. This paper explores how and why people take breaks from social media. Using a mixed methods approach, we pair data from users who tweeted about giving up Twitter for Lent with an interview study of social media users. We find that 64% of users who proclaim that they are giving up Twitter for Lent successfully do so. Among those who fail, 31% acknowledge their failure; the other 69% simply return. We observe hedging patterns (e.g. "I thought about giving up Twitter for Lent but"?) that surfaced uncertainty about social media behavior. Interview participants were concerned about the tradeoffs of spending time on social media versus doing other things and of spending time on social media rather than in "real life." We discuss gaps in related theory that might help reduce users' anxieties and open design problems related to designing systems and services that can help users manage their own social media use.

References

  1. Bandura, A. Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication. In J. Bryant and M.B. Oliver, eds., Media Effects: Advances in theory and research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., and Tice, D.M. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J. of Personality and Soc. Pscyh. 74, 5 (1998), 1252--1265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baumeister, R.F., Heatherton, T.F., and Tice, D.M. Losing control: How and why people fail at selfregulation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumer, E.P.S., Adams, P., Khovanskaya, V.D., et al. Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. In Proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 3257--3266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Birnholtz, J. Adopt, adapt, abandon: Understanding why some young adults start, and then stop, using instant messaging. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 6 (2010), 1427--1433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Burke, M., Marlow, C., and Lento, T. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 1909--1912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Carr, N. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W.W. Norton & Company, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D., & Landay, J.A. Theorydriven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. In Proc CHI '09, ACM Press (2009), 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Elder, M. Giving up social media for Lent will cleanse your soul, Russians told. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/15/social -media-lent-russia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. JCMC 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., and Landay, J. The design of eco-feedback technology. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press, 1999--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Goffman, E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Simon & Schuster, New York, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Goode, E. and Ben-Yehuda, N. Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction. Annual Review of Sociology 20, 1 (1994), 149--171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Iyer, P. The Joy of Quiet. New York Times, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Job, V., Dweck, C.S., and Walton, G.M. Ego Depletion--Is It All in Your Head? Implicit Theories About Willpower Affect Self-Regulation. Psychological Science 21, 11 (2010), 1686--1693.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jurgenson, N. The IRL Fetish. The New Inquiry, 2012. http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/the-irl-fetish/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Keyishian, A. No Matter What You're Giving Up for Lent, Here's How to Stick to Your Guns. mydaily.com/2011/03/18/giving-up-for-lent-chocolate/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kross, E., Verduyn, P., Demiralp, E., et al. Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults. PLoS ONE 8, 8 (2013), e69841.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lakoff, G. Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. In D. Hockney, W. Harper and B. Freed, eds., Contemporary Research in Philosophical Logic and Linguistic Semantics. Springer Netherlands, 1975, 221--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanier, J. You Are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto. Deckle, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Leshed, G. and Sengers, P. I Lie to Myself that I Have Freedom in My Own Schedule : Productivity Tools and Experiences of Busyness. In Proc. '11, ACM Press (2011), 905--914. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Li, I., Forlizzi, J., and Dey, A. Know Thyself : Monitoring and Reflecting on Facets of One's Life. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press, 4489--4492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Liu, K. and Tree, J.E.F. Hedges enhance memory but inhibit retelling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 19, 5 (2012), 892--898.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Markkanen, R. & Schröder, H., eds. Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. Vol. 24. Walter de Gruyter, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Marwick, A.E. and Boyd, D. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. NM&S 13, 1 (2010), 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller, E.T. & Marlatt, G.A. (1998). How to Keep Up with Those New Year's Resolutions: Researchers Find Commitment Is the Secret of Success.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moraveji, N. Calming Technologies. In Proc. CHI, '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mukhopadhyay, A. and Johar, G.V. Where There Is a Will, Is There a Way? Effects of Lay Theories of SelfControl on Setting and Keeping Resolutions. Journal of Consumer Research 31, 4 (2005), 779--786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Orenstein, P. Stop Your Search Engines. The New York Times Magazine, Oct 23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Pearse, D. Facebook's "dark side": study finds link to socially aggressive narcissism. The Guardian. May 7, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Portword-Stacer, L. Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rainie, L., Smith, A., and Duggan, M. Coming and Going on Facebook. Pew Internet, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Roiphe, K. Can We Really Unplug? Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/life/roiphe/2012/01/why_ is_the_freedom_app_so_popular_.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenbaum, P. Observational Studies. SpringerVerlag, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Satchell, C. and Dourish, P. Beyond The User: Use And Non-Use in HCI. In Proc. OzCHI '09, ACM Press (2009), 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Smith, S. What People Gave Up For Lent 2012 (According to Twitter). ChristianityToday. http://www.christianitytoday.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Soojung-Kim Pang, A. The Distraction Addiction. Little, Brown and Company, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Stieger, S., Burger, C., Bohn, M., and Voracek, M. Who Commits Virtual Identity Suicide? Differences in Privacy Concerns, Internet Addiction, and Personality Between Facebook Users and Quitters. Cyberpsychology, behavior & soc. networking, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Thurston, B. #UNPLUG: Baratunde Thurston Left the Internet for 25 Days, and you Should, Too. Fast Company, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Thurston, H. Lent. The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1910. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09152a.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Turkle, S. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Vitak, J., Lansing, E., Lampe, C., Arbor, A., and Ellison, N.B. Why Won't You Be My Facebook Friend : Strategies for Managing Context Collapse in the Workplace. In Proc. iConference '12, 555--557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Wellman, B. and Gulia, M. Virtual Communities are Communities: Web Surfers Don't Ride Alone. In M.A. Smith and P. Kollock, eds., Routledge, 1999, 167--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Winston, K. After giving up religion, atheists try giving up something else for Lent. Religion News Service, 2013. http://www.religionnews.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolcott, H.F. Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA., 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Woodruff, A., Augustin, S., and Foucault, B. Sabbath Day Home Automation: "It's Like Mixing Technology and Religion." In Proc. CHI '07 , ACM Press (2007), 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Wyche, S.P. and Grinter, R.E. Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home. In Proc. CHI '09 (2009), ACM Press (2009), 749--758. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Yardi, S. and Bruckman, A. Social and Technical Challenges in Parenting Teens' Social Media Use. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 3237--3246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Handbook of Stress, Coping, & Health. (2012). SAGE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. China seeks to "limit game hours". BBC News. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6544759.stm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Giving up Twitter for Lent: how and why we take breaks from social media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader