Jina Huh
ABSTRACT
Online health communities are known to provide psychosocial support. However, concerns for misinformation being shared around clinical information persist. An existing practice addressing this concern includes monitoring and, as needed, discouraging asking clinical questions in the community. In this paper, I examine such practice where moderators redirected patients to see their health care providers instead of consulting the community. I observed that, contrary to common beliefs, community members provided constructive tips and persuaded the patients to see doctors rather than attempting to make a diagnosis or give medical advice. Moderators' posts on redirecting patients to see their providers were highly associated with no more follow up replies, potentially hindering active community dynamic. The findings showed what is previously thought of as a solution-quality control through moderation-might not be best and that the community, in coordination with moderators, can provide critical help in addressing clinical questions and building constructive information sharing community environment.
- Bäckstrand, K. Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3, 4 (2003), 24--41.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bacon, E.S., Condon, E.H., and Fernsler, J.I. Young widows' experience with an Internet self-help group. Journal of psychosocial nursing and mental health services 38, 7 (2000), 24.Google Scholar
- Berge, Z.L. and Collins, M.P. Perceptions of e-moderators about their roles and functions in moderating electronic mailing lists. Distance Education 21, 1 (2000), 81--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Camasso, M.J. and Camasso, A.E. Practitioner productivity and the product content of medical care in publicly supported health centers. Social science & medicine (1982) 38, 5 (1994), 733--48.Google Scholar
- Campbell, H., Phaneuf, M., and Deane, K. Cancer peer support programs-do they work? Patient Educ Couns 55, 1 (2004), 3--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cohen, S., Gottlieb, B., and Underwood, L. Social relationships and health. In S. Cohen, L. Underwood and B. Gottlieb, eds., Measuring and intervening in social support. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000, 3--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dugdale, D.C., Epstein, R., and Pantilat, S.Z. Time and the patient-physician relationship. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14, S1 (1999), S34--S40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edwards, L.L., Reis, J.S., and Weber, K.M. Facilitators and Barriers to Discussing HIV Prevention With Adolescents: Perspectives of HIV-Infected Parents. American journal of public health 103, 8 (2013), 1468--1475.Google Scholar
- Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., and Stern, A. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 328, 7449 (2004), 1166.Google Scholar
- Fox, S. and Duggan, M. Health Online. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Jan 15, 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media/Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf. Accessed on December 10, 2013.Google Scholar
- Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., and Burke M. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Nov 26, 2000. http://www.pewinternet.org/2000/11/26/the-online-health-care-revolution/. Accessed on December 10, 2014Google Scholar
- Frost, J. and Massagli, M. PatientsLikeMe the case for a data-centered patient community and how ALS patients use the community to inform treatment decisions and manage pulmonary health. Chron. Respir. Dis. 6, 4 (2009), 225--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Giese-Davis, J., Bliss-Isberg, C., Carson, K., et al. The effect of peer counseling on quality of life following diagnosis of breast carcinoma: An observational study. Psycho-Oncology 15, 11 (2006), 1014--1022.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hartzler, A., McDonald, D., Pratt, W., Park, A., and Huh, J. Facilitating Mentoring in peer health communities through social matching: Detecting mentorship characteristics from community data. American Medical Informatics Association Extended Abstracts. (2012).Google Scholar
- Hartzler, A. and Pratt, W. Managing the Personal Side of Health: How Patient Expertise Differs from the Expertise of Clinicians. J Med Internet Res 13, 3 (2011), e62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Heisler, M., Vijan, S., Makki, F., and Piette, J.D. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 153, 8 (2010), 507--15.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huh, J., Mcdonald, D.W., Hartzler, A., and Pratt, W. Patient Moderator Interaction in Online Health Communities. Proceedings of American Medical Informatics Association (2013), 627--636.Google Scholar
- Huh, J., Patel, R., and Pratt, W. Tackling Dilemmas in Supporting "The Whole Person" in Online Patient Communities. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), ACM (2012), 923--926. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson, B.T. Effects of outcome-relevant involvement and prior information on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30, 6 (1994), 556--579.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, G.J. and Ambrose, P.J. Neo-Tribes: The Power and Potential of Online Communities in Health Care. Communications of the ACM 49, 1 (2006), 107--113. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klasnja, P., Hartzler, A., Powell, C., and Pratt, W. Supporting cancer patients' unanchored health information management with mobile technology. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, (2011), 732.Google Scholar
- Liao, Qinying, Yingxin Pan, Michelle X. Zhou, and Fei Ma. Chinese online communities: balancing managementcontrol and individual autonomy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2193--2202. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liess, A., Simon, W., Yutsis, M., et al. Detecting emotional expression in face-to-face and online breast cancer support groups. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 76, 3 (2008), 517--23.Google Scholar
- Malik, S.H. and Coulson, N.S. A comparison of lurkers and posters within infertility online support groups. Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN 29, 10 (2011), 564--73.Google Scholar
- Maloney-Krichmar, D. and Preece, J. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 2 (2005), 201--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mason, M. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 11, 3 (2010).Google Scholar
- Namkoong, K., Dubenske, L.L., Shaw, B.R., et al. Creating a Bond Between Caregivers Online: Effect on Caregivers' Coping Strategies. Journal of health communication, (2011) 17, 2 (2012): 125--140.Google Scholar
- Orizio, G., Schulz, P., Gasparotti, C., Caimi, L., and Gelatti, U. The world of e-patients: A content analysis of online social networks focusing on diseases. Telemedicine journal and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association 16, 10 (2010), 1060--6.Google Scholar
- Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., and Goldman, R. Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of personality and social psychology 41, 5 (1981), 847.Google Scholar
- Pourmand, A. and Sikka, N. Online health information impacts patients' decisions to seek emergency department care. The western journal of emergency medicine 12, 2 (2011), 174--7.Google Scholar
- Resnick, P.J., Janney, A.W., Buis, L.R., and Richardson, C.R. Adding an online community to an internet-mediated walking program. Part 2: strategies for encouraging community participation. Journal of medical Internet research 12, 4 (2010), e72.Google Scholar
- Roberts, L., Salem, D., Rappaport, J., Toro, P., Luke, D., and Seidman, E. Giving and receiving help: Interpersonal transactions in mutual-help meetings and psychosocial adjustment of members. Am J Community Psychol 27, 6 (1999), 841--68.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Setoyama, Y., Yamazaki, Y., and Namayama, K. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 4 (2011), e122.Google Scholar
- Smithson, J., Sharkey, S., Hewis, E., et al. Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Studies 13, 4 (2011), 487--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Strauss, A.L. and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
- Vlahovic, T.A., Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R.E., and Levine, J.M. Support matching and satisfaction in an online breast cancer support community. Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, ACM Press (2014), 1625--1634. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walsh, P. The Web and the unassailable voice. Archives and Museum Informatics 11, 2 (1997), 77--85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R.E., and Levine, J.M. To Stay or Leave? The Relationship of Emotional and Informational Support to Commitment in Online Health Support Groups. CSCW, (2012), 833--842. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zibit, M. What online facilitators say is difficult-experiences from Mathemagica online professional development. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, (2003), 843--844.Google Scholar
- dLife forum guidelines. http://www.dlife.com/policy/forum_guidelines.Google Scholar
- diabeticconnect.com terms of use. http://www.diabeticconnect.com/terms-of-use#disclaimer.Google Scholar
- webmd policies. http://www.webmd.com/about-webmd-policies/additional-info?ss=ftr.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Clinical Questions in Online Health Communities: The Case of "See your doctor" Threads
Recommendations
Weaving clinical expertise in online health communities
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMany patients visit online health communities to receive support. In face-to-face support groups, health professionals facilitate peer-patients exchanging experience while adding their clinical expertise when necessary. However, the large scale of ...
Online health communities
CHI EA '07: CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOnline health communities provide a means for patients and their families to learn about an illness, seek and offer support, and connect with others in similar circumstances. Online health communities raise difficult design challenges because of the ...
Text classification for assisting moderators in online health communities
Display Omitted We propose a method for improving the quality of online health communities.We present a solution to reduce the workload of the online community moderators.We explore low-cost text classification methods to a new social media domain.We ...
Comments