skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518849acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose that a fundamental property of human psychology, the need to maintain independent social spheres, imposes constraints on the use of social network sites (SNS). We particularly focus on the consequences of visibility of communications across social spheres, and we hypothesize that technological features of SNS may bring social spheres in conflict, thus leading to increased levels of online social tension. A survey study among Facebook users was conducted to test this hypothesis. Results showed that diversity of the Facebook network predicted online tension. Moreover, the number of kin in a Facebook network was a crucial component because it predicted online tension whereas number of work and social contacts did not. Further, evidence was found to support the idea that tension might impose an upper limit on network size. We conclude with a discussion of these findings and describe how they support the thrust of recent modifications to SNS designs.

References

  1. Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proc. PET 2006, Robinson College (2006), 36--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aiken, L. S.,&West, S. G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M.,&Kenny, D. A. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (1986), 1173--1182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B.,&Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of internet ties. Pew Internet&American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. boyd, d. Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11 (2006). Available at: http://www.firstmonday.org/ISSUES/issue11_12/boyd/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. boyd, d.,&Ellison, N. B. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (2008), 210--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, R. S. Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright, D., and Harary, F. Structural balance: A generalization of Heider's theory. Psychological Review, 63 (1956), 277--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. CNET News. Facebook fires up IM, ratchets up privacy. 18 March 2008. http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-9896860-36.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Donath, J.,&boyd, d. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22 (2004), 71--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dunbar, R. I. M. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6 (1998), 178--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C.,&Lampe, C. The benefits of facebook friends: Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Gray, W. D.&Boehm-Davis, D. A. Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6 (2000), 322--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gross, R. and Acquisti, A. Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In Workshop on Privacy in Electronic Society, ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Grossetti, M. Where do social relations come from? A study of personal networks in the Toulouse area of France. Social Networks, 27 (2005), 289--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Joinson, A. N. 'Looking at', 'looking up' or 'keeping up with' people? Motives and uses of Facebook. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kadushin, C. Power, influence and social circles: A new methodology for studying opinion makers. American Sociological Review, 33 (1968), 685--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J.,&McGuire, T. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39 (1984), 1123--1134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V.,&Crawford, A. Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58 (2002), 49--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfield, C. A. A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 167--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lee, H. Behavioral strategies for dealing with flaming in an online forum. The Sociological Quarterly, 46 (2005), 385--403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. McCarty, C., Killworth, P. D., Bernard, H. R., Johnsen, E. C.,&Shelley, G. A. Comparing two methods for estimating network size. Human Organization, 60 (2001), 28--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L.,&Cook, J. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. O'Hara, K. P.,&Payne, S. J. Planning and the user interface: The effects of lockout time and error recovery cost. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50 (1999), 41--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Verbeke, W.,&Wuyts, S. Moving in social circles: Social circle membership and performance implications. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28 (2007), 357--379.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wasserman, S.,&Faust, K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1994).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J.,&Hampton, K. Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (2001), 436--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader