ABSTRACT
Privacy practices in social network sites often appear paradoxical, as content-sharing behavior stands in conflict with the need to reduce disclosure-related harms. In this study we explore privacy in social network sites as a contextual information practice, managed by a process of boundary regulation. Drawing on a sample survey of undergraduate Facebook users, we examine a particular privacy-enhancing practice: having a friends-only Facebook profile. Particularly, we look at the association between network composition, expectancy violations, interpersonal privacy practices and having a friends-only profile. We find that expectancy violations by weak ties and increased levels of interpersonal privacy management are positively associated with having a friends-only profile. We conclude with a discussion of how these findings may be integrated into the design of systems to facilitate interaction while enhancing individual privacy.
- AAPOR. Standard Dentitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys (5th Ed.). Lenexa, KS: AAPOR, 2008.Google Scholar
- Ackerman, M.S. Augmenting organizational memory: a field study of answer garden. ACM TOIS 16, 3 (1998) 203--224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Proc. PET 2006, Springer (2006), 36--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Altman, I. The Environment and Social Behavior. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA, 1975.Google Scholar
- Barnes, S. A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday 11, 9 (2006).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bose, J. Nonresponse bias analyses at the National Center for Education Statistics. Proc. Statistics Canada Symposium 2001. (2001).Google Scholar
- boyd, d. Why Youth (heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In Buckingham, D. (Ed.), The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007, 119--142.Google Scholar
- boyd, d. and Ellison, N.B. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. JCMC 13, 1 (2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burgoon, J.K. A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research 4, 2 (1978), 129--142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Couper, M.P., Kapteyn, A., Schonlau, M., and Winter, J. Noncoverage and nonresponse in an Internet survey. Social Science Research 36, 1 (2007), 131--148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Derlega, V. & Chaikin, A. Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. J Social Issues 33, 3 (1977), 102--115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donath, J. Signals in Social Supernets. JCMC 13, 1 (2007).Google Scholar
- Donath, J. and boyd, d. Public displays of connection. BT Tech J 22, 4 (2004), 71--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. and Anderson, K. Collective Information Practice: Exploring Privacy and Security as Social and Cultural Phenomena. Human Computer Interaction 21, 3 (2006), 319--342. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., and Lampe, C. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. JCMC 12, 4 (2007).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fogel, J. and Nehmad, E. Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior 25, 1 (2009), 153--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Groves, R.M. Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. POQ 70, 5 (2006), 646--675.Google Scholar
- Lampe, C., Ellison, N.B., and Steinfield, C. Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Proc CSCW 2008, ACM Press (2008), 721--730. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampe, C., Ellison, N., and Steinfeld, C. A Face(book) in the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 167--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lampinen, A., Tamminen, S., and Oulasvirta, A. All My People Right Here, Right Now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site. Proc. GROUP 2009, ACM Press (2009), 281--290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lenhart, A. Adults and Social Network Websites. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved January 14, 2009 from http://www.pewinternet.org /PPF/r/272/report_display.asp, (2009).Google Scholar
- Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., and Christakis, N. The Taste for Privacy: An Analysis of College Student Privacy Settings in an Online Social Network. JCMC 14, 1 (2008).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Margulis, S.T. On the Status and Contribution of Westin's and Altman's Theories of Privacy. J Social Issues 59, 2 (2003), 411--429.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McCroskey, J.C. and Young, T.J. The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research 5, 4 (1979), 375---382.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Palen, L. and Dourish, P. Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 129--136. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petronio, S. Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure. SUNY, Albany, NY, 2002.Google Scholar
- Ren, Y., Kraut, R., and Kiesler, S. Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities. Organizational Studies 28, 3 (2007), 377--408.Google Scholar
- Sassenberg, K. Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6, 1 (2002), 27--37.Google Scholar
- Skeels, M.M. and Grudin, J. (2009). When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of Facebook and Linkedin. Proc GROUP 2009, ACM Press (2009), 95--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Solove, D.J. The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor and Privacy on the Internet. Yale: New Haven, CT, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tufekci, Z. Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites. Bulletin STS 28, 1 (2008), 20--36.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B. and Wortley, S. Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support. American Journal of Sociology 96, 3 (1990), 558--588Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valenzuela, S., Park, N., and Kee, K.F. Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site? JCMC 14, 4, (2000).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook
Recommendations
Identifying social capital in the facebook interface
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA number of studies have identified a robust relationship between the use of social network sites, particularly Facebook, and positive outcomes such as social capital. Social network site use is often measured as a function of use frequency, network ...
Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites
In this paper, we explore how privacy settings and privacy policy consumption (reading the privacy policy) affect the relationship between privacy attitudes and disclosure behaviors. We present results from a survey completed by 122 users of Facebook ...
"Purging my friends list. Good luck making the cut"
Examined the perceptions of narcissistic statements on Facebook.Narcissistic status updates viewed negatively relative to neutral updates.Narcissism and gender of the perceiver played a role in ratings of status updates. Social media sites such as ...
Comments