skip to main content
10.1145/2145204.2145262acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Contents and contexts: disclosure perceptions on facebook

Published:11 February 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social network sites (SNSs) provide new forms of communication, in which people routinely share personal information with a large audience. The goal of this research is to examine how a public context in which disclosures are revealed influences receivers' impressions of disclosure and a discloser on SNSs. The results of the original study reported in this paper indicate that publicly shared disclosures were perceived as less intimate and less appropriate than privately shared disclosures on Facebook, and perceptions of disclosure appropriateness mediated the effects of public/private contexts on social attraction for a discloser. The results inform research on social outcomes associated with SNS's use, as well as design considerations for privacy- and disclosure-related behaviors in social media.

References

  1. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 181--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bonnesen, J. L., & Hummet, M. L. (2002). Painful self-disclosures of older adults in relation to aging stereotypes and perceived motivations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 275--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 571--580. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chaikin, A. L, & Derlega, V. J. (1974). Variables affecting the appropriateness of self-disclosure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 588--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457--475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Exploring the relationship between college students' use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 101--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Prager, K. J. (1995). The psychology of intimacy. New York: The Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Pronin, E., Fleming, J. J., & Steffel, M. (2008). Value revelations: Disclosure is in the eye of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 795--809Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367--389). Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Schoeman, F. (1984). Philosophical dimensions of privacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tong, S., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Relational maintenance and CMC. In K. B. Wright and L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 98--118). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Contents and contexts: disclosure perceptions on facebook

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '12: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
          February 2012
          1460 pages
          ISBN:9781450310864
          DOI:10.1145/2145204

          Copyright © 2012 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 11 February 2012

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CSCW '12 Paper Acceptance Rate164of415submissions,40%Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader