skip to main content
research-article

Co-narrating a conflict: An interactive tabletop to facilitate attitudinal shifts

Published:25 October 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A multi-user tabletop interface was designed to support reconciliation of a conflict aimed at shifting hostile attitudes and achieving a greater understanding of another viewpoint. The interface provided a setting for face-to-face shared narration and support for the management of disagreements. The interface allows for escalation and de-escalation of the conflict emerging in the shared narration and requires that participants perform joint actions when a contribution to the story is to be removed from the overall narration. A between-subjects experiment compared the tabletop interface and a desktop multimedia interface with mixed pairs (male Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian-Arab youth). The results demonstrated that the experience with the tabletop interface appears to be motivating and, most importantly, produces at least a short-term shift of attitude toward the other.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Alborzi, H., Druin, A., Montemayor, J., Platner, M., Porteous, J., Sherman, L., Boltman, A., Taxén, G., Best, J., Hammer, J., Kruskal, A., Lal, A., Schwenn, T. P., Sumida, L., Wagner, R., and Hendler, J. 2000. Designing StoryRooms: Interactive storytelling spaces for children. In Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques. 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ananny, M. 2002. Supporting children's collaborative authoring: Practicing written literacy while composing oral texts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andriessen, J. H. E. 2003. Working With Groupware: Understanding And Evaluating Collaboration Technology. Springer, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bar-On, D. and Adwan, S. 2006. The PRIME shared history project. Peace-building project under fire. In Educating Toward a Culture of Peace, Y. Iram, Ed. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, 309--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar-On, D. and Kassem, F. 2004. Storytelling as a way to work-through intractable conflicts: The German Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian-Israeli context. J. Social Issues 60, 289--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Baruch Bush, R. A. and Folger, J. P. 1994. The Promise of Mediation: Responding to Conflict Through Empowerment and Recognition. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Benford, S., O'Malley, C., Simsarian, K. T., Stanton, D., Sundblad, Y., Taxén, G., Bederson, B. B., Åkesson, K.-P., Bayon, V., Druin, A., Hansson, P., Hourcade, J. P., Ingram, R., and Neale H. 2000. Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Benford, S., Rowland, D., Flintham, M., Drozd, A., Hull, R., Reid, J., Morrison, J., and Facer, K. 2005. Life on the edge: Supporting collaboration in location-based experiences. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 721--730. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bekerman, Z. and Horenczyk, G. 2004. Arab-Jewish bilingual coeducation in Israel: A long-term approach to intergroup conflict resolution. J. Social Issues, 60, 389--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bland, J. M. and Altman, D. G. 1997. Cronbach's alpha. Brit. Med. J. 314, 572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bobick, A. F., Intille, S. S., Davis, J. W., Baird, F., Pinhanez, C. S., Campbell, L. W., Ivanov, Y. A., Schütte, A., and Wilson, A. 2000. Perceptual user interfaces: The KidsRoom. Commun. ACM. 43, 60--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bollnow, O. F. 1967. Lived-space. In Readings in Existential Phenomenology. N. Lawrence and D. O'Connor Eds. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 178--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bricker, L. J. 1998. Cooperatively controlled objects in support of collaboration. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Washington. http://www.brickware.com/tech/lauren/pubs/thesis.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cao, X., Lindley, S. E., Helmes, J., and Sellen, A. 2010. Telling the whole story: Anticipation, inspiration and reputation in a field deployment of TellTable. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 251--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cappelletti, A., Gelmini, G., Pianesi, F., Rossi, F., and Zancanaro, M. 2004. Enforcing cooperative storytelling: First studies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'04). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Cassell, J. 2004. Towards a model of technology and literacy development: Story listening systems. J. Appl. Develop. Psychol. 25, 75--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Correia, A. P. 2008. Team conflict in ICT-rich environments: Roles of technologies in conflict management. Brit. J. Educ. Technol. 39, 1, 18--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Cross, R. and Rosenthal, R. 1999 Three models of conflict resolution: Effects on intergroup expectancies and attitudes. J. Social Issues 55, 561--580.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dewey, J. 1933. How Do We Think. Henry Regnery, Co., Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Dietz, P. H. and Leigh, D. L. 2001. DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Eisikovits, Z. and Buchbinder, E. 2000. Locked in a Violent Embrace. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Eisikovits, Z. and Winstok, Z. 2002. Reconstructing intimate violence: The structure and content of recollections of violence events. Qualitat. Health Res. 12, 685--699.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Eisikovits, Z., Winstok, Z., and Gelles, R. 2002. Structure and dynamics of escalation from the victim's perspective. Families Soc. 83, 142--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Factor, R., Kawachi, I., and Williams, D. R. 2011. Understanding high-risk behavior among non-dominant minorities: A social resistance framework. Soc. Sci. Medi. 73, 1292--1301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Flick, U. 2006. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fleck, R., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., Marshall, P., Carr, A., Rick, J., and Bonnett, V. 2009. Actions speak loudly with words: Unpacking collaboration around the table. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on International Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS'09). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. 2007. Direct-touch vs. mice input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference (CHI'07). 647--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Friedman, B., Nathan, L. P., Lake, M., Carden Grey, N., Nilsen, T. T., Utter, R. F., Utter, E. J., Ring, M., and Kahn, Z. 2010. Multi-lifespan information system design in post-conflict societies: An evolving project in Rwanda. In Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 2833--2842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Gergen, K. 2009. An Invitation to Social Construction. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Gal, E., Bauminger, N., Goren-Bar, D., Pianesi, F., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., and Weiss, P. L. 2009. Enhancing social communication of children with high functioning autism through a co-located interface. Artif. Intell. Soc. 24, 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Green, J., Schnädelbach, H., Koleva, B., Benford, S., Pridmore, T., and Medina, K. 2002. Camping in the digital wilderness: Tents and flashlights as interfaces to virtual worlds. In Proceedings of ACM Computer-Human Interaction Conference (CHI-02). 780--781. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Grudin, J. 1991. Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large product development organizations. Hum. Comput. Interac. 6, 147--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Hagai, E. B., Hammack, P., and Pilecki, A. 2011. Shifting away from a monolithic narrative on the conflict: Israelis, Palestinians and Americans in conversations. International Association for Conflict Management Conference Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1866513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Hiltz, S. R. and Turoff, M, 1993 The Network Nation, Revised Edition. MIT Press, Cambride, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Sheep Dalton, N., and Rogers, Y. 2008. Collaboration and interference: Awareness with mice or touch input. In Proceedings ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'08). 167--176 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hourcade, J. P. and Bullock-Rest, N. E. 2011. HCI for peace: An invitation to positive action. User Exp. 10 4--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Kupersmitt, J., Yifat, R., Gal, E., Bauminger, N., Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Pianesi, F., and Weiss, P. L. 2010. Joint construction of stories by high functioning children with autism: Using a technological setting. Int. J. Child Adol. Health, 2, 97--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S., and Tang, 2005. A. Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In Proceedings of the ACM Computer-Human Interaction Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Luwisch, F. E. 2001. Understanding what goes on in the heart and the mind: Learning about diversity and co-existence through storytelling. Teach. Teach. Educ. 17, 133--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Marshal, C. and Rosman, B. 2006. Designing Qualitative Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Maoz, I., Bar-On, D., and Fakhereldeen, M. 2002. The dialogue between the “Self” and the “Other”: A process analysis of Palestinian Jewish encounters in Israel. Hum. Relations 55, 931--962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Maoz, I. and Mccauley, C. 2005. Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish-Israeli attitudes toward solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Political Psychol. 26, 791--807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Maoz, I. and Mccauley, C. 2009. Threat perceptions and feelings as predictors of Jewish-Israeli support for compromise with Palestinians. J. Peace Res. 46, 525--539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Mcnamee, S. and Gergen, K. 1999. Relational Responsibility: Resources For Sustainable Dialogue. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Mishler, E. G. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Morris, M. R., Huang, A., Paepcke, A., and Winograd, T. 2006. Cooperative gestures: Multi-user gestural interactions for co-located groupware. In Proceedings of the ACM Computer-Human Interaction Conference-06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Pettygrew, T. F. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 49, 65--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Piper, A. M. and Hollan, J. D. 2009. Tabletop displays for small group study: Affordances of paper and digital materials. In Proceedings. of the ACM Computer-Human Interation Conference. 1227--1236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Price, S, Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D., and Neale, H. 2003. Using ‘tangibles’ to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interac. Comput. 15, 169--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. E. 2004. Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: Which way is best? Interac. Comput. 16, 6, 1133--1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Ryokai, K, Vaucelle, C., and Cassell, J. 2003. Virtual peers as partners in storytelling and literacy learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 19, 195--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Shadish, W., Cook, T., and Campbell, D. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Safran, W. 1999. Nationalism. In Handbook of Language and Ethnic Identity, J. A. Fishman, Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K, 77--93.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Sagy, S., Adwan, S., and Kaplan, A. 2002. Interpretations of the past and expectations for the future among Israeli and Palestinian youth. Am. J. Orthopsychia. 72, 26--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Sagy, S., Orr, E., Bar-On, D., and Awwad, E. 2001. Individualism and collectivism in two conflicted societies: Comparing Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian-Arab high school students. Youth Soc. 33, 3--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Salomon, G. 2004. Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict? J. Peace Psychol. 10, 257--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Sawhney, N. 2009. Voices beyond walls: The role of digital storytelling for empowering marginalized youth in refugee camps. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interation Design and Children. 302--305. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Shneiderman, B. 1991. Human values and the future of technology: A declaration of responsibility. SIGCHI Bull. 23, 11--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Smyth, T. N., Etherton, J., and Best, M. L. 2010. MOSES: Exploring new ground in media and post-conflict reconciliation. Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction Conference. 1059--1068. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Rocchi, C., Tomasini, D., Koren, C., Eisikovits, Z., Goren-Bar, D., and Weiss, P. L. 2008. A co-located interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict: Initial Results from Jewish and Palestinian youth. In Proceedings of the 26th Computer-Human Interaction Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Stock, O., Zancanaro, M., Rocchi, C., Tomasini, D., Koren, C., Eisikovits, Z., Goren-Bar, D., and Weiss, P. L. 2009. The design of a collaborative interface for narration to support reconciliation in a conflict. Artif. Intell. Soc. 24, 51--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Tse, E., Greenberg, S., Shen, C., and Forlines, C. 2007. Multimodal multiplayer tabletop gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5, 2, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Winslade, J., and Monk, G. 2000. Narrative Mediation. A New Approach to Conflict Resolution. Jossey-Bass Publisher, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Winstok, Z. 2008. Conflict escalation to violence and escalation of violent conflicts. Children Youth Serv. Rev. 30, 297--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Winstok, Z., Eisikovits, Z., and Fishman, G. 2004. Towards the development of a conflict escalation model: The case of Israeli youth. J. Youth Adolescence, 33, 283--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Winstok, Z., Eisikovits, Z., and Gelles, R. 2002. Structures and dynamics of escalation from the batterer's perspective. J. Contemp. Hum. Ser. 83, 129--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Zancanaro, M., Cappelletti, A., and, Stock, O. 2003. StoryTable: Computer supported collaborative storytelling. In Proceedings of the International Conference on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'03).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Co-narrating a conflict: An interactive tabletop to facilitate attitudinal shifts

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 19, Issue 3
      October 2012
      209 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/2362364
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2012
      • Accepted: 1 June 2012
      • Revised: 1 January 2012
      • Received: 1 August 2011
      Published in tochi Volume 19, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader