skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1055055acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Fluid integration of rotation and translation

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that rotation and orientation of items plays three major roles during collaboration: comprehension, coordination and communication. Based on these roles of orientation and advice from kinesiology research, we have designed the Rotate'N Translate (RNT) interaction mechanism, which provides integrated control of rotation and translation using only a single touch-point for input. We present an empirical evaluation comparing RNT to a common rotation mechanism that separates control of rotation and translation. Results of this study indicate RNT is more efficient than the separate mechanism and better supports the comprehension, coordination and communication roles of orientation.

References

  1. Balakrishnan, R., Baudel, T., Kurtenbach, G. and Fitzmaurice, G. The Rockin'Mouse: integral 3d manipulation on a plane. In Proceedings of CHI '97, ACM Press, (1997), 311--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beck, K. Extreme Programming Explained - Embrace Change, Addison Wesley 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buxton, W. and Myers, B. A study in two-handed input. In Proceedings of CHI '86, (1986), 321--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, M., Mountford, S.J., and Sellen, A. A study in interactive 3-D rotation using 2-D control devices. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, (1988), 121--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Deitz, P. and Leigh, D. DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. In Proceedings of UIST '01, ACM Press, (2001), 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fitzmaurice, G. W. Graspable User Interfaces. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hancock, M. S., and Booth, K. S. (2004). Improving menu placement strategies for pen input. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (2004), 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hinckley, K., Sinclair, M., Hanson, E., Szeliski, R. and Conway, M. The VideoMouse: a camera-based multi-degree-of-freedom input device. In Proceedings of UIST '99, ACM Press, (1999), 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jacob, R., Sibert, L., McFarlane, D. and Preston Mullen, M. Integrality and separability of input devices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 1, 1 (1994), 3--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., Greenberg, S. Roles of orientation in tabletop collaboration: comprehension, coordination and communication. Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Work. (in press). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. MacKenzie, I., S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Human Computer Interaction, 7, (1992), 91--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. MacKenzie, I., Soukoreff, R. and Pat, C. A two-ball mouse affords three degrees of freedom. In Extended Abstract of CHI '97 ACM Press, (1997), 303--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Magerkurth, C., Stenzel, R. and Prante, T. STARS - a ubiquitous computing platform for computer augmented tabletop games. In Extended Abstract of UbiComp '03, Springer, (2003), 267--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McCloud, S. Understanding Comics: The invisible art. Harper Collins, New York, New York, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell, G. D. Orientation on Tabletop Displays. M.Sc. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Perlin, K., and Fox, D. Pad: An alternative approach to the computer interface. In SIGGRAPH '93 Proceedings, ACM Press, (1993), 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rekimoto, J. and Saitoh, M. Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In Proceedings of CHI '99, ACM Press, (1999), 378--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ringel, M., Ryall, K., Shen, C., Forlines, C. and Vernier, F. Release, relocate, reorient, resize: fluid techniques for document sharing on multi-user interactive tables. In Extended Abstracts of CHI'04, ACM Press, (2004), 1441--1444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Scott, S.D., Carpendale, M.S.T, & Inkpen, K.M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of CSCW'04, (2004), 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shen, C, Vernier, F., Forlines, C. and Ringel, M. DiamondSpin: An extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction. In Proceedings of CHI'04, ACM Press, (2004), 167--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Shen, C., Lesh, N., Vernier, F., Forlines, C. and Frost, J. Sharing and building digital group histories. In Proceedings of CSCW '02, (2002), 324--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Streitz, N., Geißler, J., Holmer, T., Konomi, S., M üller-Tomfelde, C., Reischl, W., Rexroth, P., Seitz, P. and Steinmetz, R. i-Land: an interactive landscape for creativity and innovation. In Proceedings of CHI '99, ACM Press, (1999), 120--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tandler, P., Prante, T., Müller-Tomfelde, C., Streitz, N. and Steinmetz, R. ConnecTables: dynamic coupling of displays for the flexible creation of shared workspaces. Proceedings of UIST '01, ACM Press, (2001), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tang, J. Findings from observational studies of collaborative work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 2 (1991), 143--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Wang, Y., MacKenzie, C., Summers, V. and Booth, K. The structure of object transportation and orientation in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of CHI '98, ACM Press, (1998), 312--319. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wu, M., Balakrishnan, R. Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In Proceedings of UIST '03, ACM Press (2003), 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fluid integration of rotation and translation

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2005
          928 pages
          ISBN:1581139985
          DOI:10.1145/1054972

          Copyright © 2005 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 April 2005

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader