skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858583acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Somaesthetic Appreciation Design

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a strong concept we name Somaesthetic Appreciation based on three different enquiries. First, our own autobiographical design enquiry, using Feldenkrais as a resource in our design process, bringing out the Soma Carpet and Breathing Light applications. Second, through bringing in others to experience our systems, engaging with and qualitatively analysing their experiences of our applications. In our third enquiry, we try to pin down what characterises and sets Somaesthetic Appreciation designs apart through comparing with and analysing others' design inquiries as well as grounding them in the somaesthetic theories. We propose that the Somaesthetic Appreciation designs share a subtleness in how they encourage and spur bodily inquiry in their choice of interaction modalities, they require an intimate correspondence -- feedback and interactions that follow the rhythm of the body, they entail a distinct manner of making space shutting out the outside world -- metaphorically and literally -- to allow users to turn their attention inwards, and they rely on articulation of bodily experiences to encourage learning and increased somatic awareness.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn2814-file3.mp4

mp4

12.2 MB

References

  1. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). 2005--2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208347 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John Bowers. 2012. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). 68--77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317968 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Antonio Damasio. 2008. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. Random House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Moshe Feldenkrais. 1972. Awareness Through Movement. Harper & Row.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank Feltham, Lian Loke, Elise van den Hoven, Jeffrey Hannam, and Bert Bongers. 2014. The slow floor: increasing creative agency while walking on an interactive surface. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14). 105--112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540974 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jodi Forlizzi and Katja Battarbee. 2004. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). 261--268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). 937--946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). 269--276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1013115.1013153 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mads Hobye. 2014. Designing for Homo Explorens: open social play in performative frames. PhD diss., Malmö University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Caroline, Hummels, Kees Overbeeke, and Sietske Klooster. 2007. Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 677--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kristina Höök. 2008. Affective Loop Experiences --What Are They?. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE '08), Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, Per Hasle, Marja Harjumaa, Katarina Segerståhl, and Peter Øhrstrøm (Eds.). 1--12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3540--68504--3_1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). 226--235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868943 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kristina Höök, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jonas Löwgren, Erik Stolterman, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Knowledge Production in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). 2429--2432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702653 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 3, Article 23 (October 2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kristina Höök, Anna Ståhl, Martin Jonsson, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, and Eva-Carin Banka Johnson. 2015. COVER STORY: Somaesthetic design. Interactions 22, 4 (June 2015), 26--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tim Ingold. 2011. Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Taylor & Francis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Katherine Isbister, Kristina Höök, K., Mark Sharp, and Jarmo Laaksolahti. 2006. The sensual evaluation instrument: developing an affective evaluation tool. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1163--1172). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. William James. 1905. The experience of activity. Psychological Review 12, no. 1 (1905): 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Naveen Ramani and Kristina Höök. 2016. The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Deane Juhan. 1995. Job's body: A handbook for bodywork (Excerpts) Bone, Breath, Gesture; Practices of Embodiment, California: North Atlantic Books: 35378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. George Khut. 2006. Development and Evaluation of Participant-Centred Biofeedback Artworks. Unpublished doctoral exegesis, University of Western Sydney.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Youn-kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, Heekyoung Jung, and Justin Donaldson. 2007. Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI '07). 239--254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1314161.1314183 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Wonjun Lee, Youn-kyung Lim, and Richard Shusterman. 2014. Practicing somaesthetics: exploring its impact on interactive product design ideation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). 1055--1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598561 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lian Loke, George Khut, L. Muller, M. Slattery, C. Truman, and J. Duckworth. 2013. Re-sensitising the body: Interactive art and the FeldenkraisMethod. International Journal of Arts and TechnologyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lain Loke, and Toni Robertson. 2013. Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach to Movement-based Interaction Design. ACM Trans. Comput.Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Jonas Löwgren and Mads Hobye. 2011. Touching a stranger: Designing for engaging experience in embodied interaction. International Journal of Design, 3(5), pp. 31--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jonas Löwgren and Erik Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Helena M. Mentis, Jarmo Laaksolahti, and Kristina Höök. 2014. My Self and You: Tension in Bodily Sharing of Experience. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 4, Article 20 (June 2014) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Jin Moen. 2005. Towards people based movement interaction and kinaesthetic interaction experiences. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (CC '05). 121--124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094579 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Carman Neustaedter and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical design in HCI research: designing and learning through use-it-yourself. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). 514--523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. C. Núñez-Pacheco and Lian Loke. 2014. Crafting the Body-Tool: A Body-centred Perspective on Wearable Technology Design. In DIS'14: Proceedings of the 2014 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Terry Regier and Paul Kay. 2009. Language, thought, and color: Whorf was half right. Trends in cognitive sciences 13, no. 10. 439--446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Marie-Louise, Rinman, Anders Friberg, Bendik Bendiksen, Demian Cirotteau, Sofia Dahl, Ivar Kjellmo, Barbara Mazzarino, and Antonio Camurri. 2004. Ghost in the Cave-an interactive collaborative game using non-verbal communication. In Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 549--556. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Pedro Sanches, Kristina Höök, Elsa Vaara, Claus Weymann, Markus Bylund, Pedro Ferreira, Nathalie Peira, and Marie Sjölinder. 2010. Mind the body!: designing a mobile stress management application encouraging personal reflection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '10). 47--56. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1858171.1858182 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Thecla Schiphorst. 2007. Really, really small: the palpability of the invisible. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition (C&C '07). 7--16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254962 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Thecla Schiphorst. 2011. Self-evidence: applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '11). 145--160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979640 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Thecla Schiphorst. 2009. soft(n): toward a somaesthetics of touch. In CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '09). 2427--2438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520345 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Thecla Schiphorst. 2009. The Varieties of User Experience Bridging Embodied Methodologies from Somatics and Performance to Human Computer Interaction, Unpublished thesis manuscript, University of Plymouth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Donald A. Schön. 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Vol. 5126. Basic books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Maxine Sheets-Johnstone. 2011. The primacy of movement (Vol. 82). John Benjamins Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Richard Shusterman. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Richard Shusterman. 2013. Somaesthetics. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed. Soegaard, Mads, and Rikke Friis Dam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Vygandas Šimbelis, Anders Lundström, Kristina Höök, Jordi Solsona, and Vincent Lewandowski. 2014. Metaphone: machine aesthetics meets interaction design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). 1--10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Erik Stolterman. 2008. The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction, International Journal of Design, Vol 2, No 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Anna Ståhl, Jonas Löwgren, and Kristina Höök. 2014. Evocative balance: Designing for interactional empowerment. Journal of Interaction Design. Vol. 8, No 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Petra Sundström. 2005. Exploring the affective loop. Licenciate Thesis, Stockholm University, SwedenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Francisco J. Varela. 1999. Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Diane Gromala. 2012. Sonic Cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). 408--417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318017 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Danielle Wilde. 2012. hipDisk: understanding the value of ungainly, embodied, performative, fun. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Farnaz Zangouei, Mohammad Ali Babazadeh Gashti, Kristina Höök, Tim Tijs, Gert-Jan de Vries, and Joyce Westerink. 2010. How to stay in the emotional rollercoaster: lessons learnt from designing EmRoll. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on HumanComputer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10). 571--580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1868978 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). 493--502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader