skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557184acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Within HCI, aging is often viewed in terms of designing assistive technologies to improve the lives of older people, such as those who are suffering from frailty or memory loss. Our research adopts a very different approach, reframing the relationship in terms of wisdom, creativity and invention. We ran a series of workshops where groups of retirees, aged between early 60s and late 80s, used the MaKey MaKey inventor's toolkit. We asked them to think about inventing the future and suggest ideas for new technologies. Our findings showed that they not only rose to the challenge but also mastered the technology, collaborated intensely together while using it and freely and at length discussed their own, their family's and others' relationship with technology. We discuss the value of empowering people in this way and consider what else could be invented to enable more people to be involved in the design and use of creative technologies.

References

  1. Bratteteig, T. and Wagner I. Spaces for participatory creativity. CoDesign 8, 2--3, (2012), 105--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77'101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Brereton, M. and McGarry. B. An observational study of how objects support engineering design thinking and communication: implications for the design of tangible media. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brereton, M. Habituated objects: everyday tangibles that foster the independent living of an elderly woman. interactions 20, 4 (2013), 20--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M., Catchen, J. and Crockett, A. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 423--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Buechley, L. and Perner-Wilson, H. Crafting technology: reimagining the processes, materials, and cultures of electronics. ACM TOCHI, 19, 3 (2012), Article 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Coleman, R. and Myerson, J. Improving life quality by countering design exclusion. Gerontechnology, 1, 2 (2001), 88--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Davidson, J.L. and Jensen, C. Participatory Design with Older Adults: An Analysis of Creativity in the Design of Mobile Healthcare Applications. In Proc. Creativity and Cognition (2013), 114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gaver, W., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. Cultural probes. interactions, 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greenhalgh T., Procter R., Rouncefield M., Dewsbury G. and Wherton, J. ATHENE: assistive technologies for healthy living in elders. In Proc. of 2nd Digital Economy All Hands Meeting, (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodges, S., Scott, J., Sentance, S., Miller, C., Villar, N., Schwiderski-Grosche, S., Hammil, K. and Johnston, S. .NETGadgeteer: A New Platform for K-12 Computer Science Education. In Proc. SIGCSE '13, ACM Press (2013), 391--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lim, C.S.C., Frohlich, D. M. and Ahmed, A. The challenge of designing for diversity in older users. Gerontechnology 11, 2 (2012), 297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lindsay, S., Brittain, K., Jackson, D., Ladha, C., Ladha, K. and Olivier, P. Empathy, Participatory Design and People with Dementia. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G. and Olivier, P. Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1199--1208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MaKey MaKey toolkit. http://www.makeymakey.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Malmborg, L., Binder, T. and Brandt, E. Elderly's everyday practices as a design approach. Workshop at NordiCHI (2012), Copenhagen, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Massimi, M., Baecker, R. and Wu, M. Using Participatory Activities with Seniors to Critique, Build, and Evaluate Mobile Phones. In Proc. ASSETS 2007 (2007), 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Newell, A.F., Morgan, M.E., Gibson, L. and Forbes, P. Experiences with professional theatre for awareness raising. Interacting with Computers 23 (2011), 594'603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Olivier, P., Xu, G., Monk, A. and Hoey, J. Ambient kitchen: designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment. In Proc. PETRA 2009, ACM Press (2009), Article 47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pantidi, N., Rogers, Y. and Robinson, H. Is the Writing on the Wall for Tabletops' In Proc. Interact 2009, Springer (2009), 125--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Perner-Wilson, H., Buechley, L. and Satomi, M. Handcrafting textile interfaces from a kit-of-no-parts. In Proc. TEI 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Resnick, M. Behavior construction kits. Comm of ACM 36, 7 (1993), 64--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Richards, M., Petre, M. and Bandara, A. Starting with Ubicomp: using the SenseBoard to introduce computing. In Proc. SIGCSE 2012, ACM Press (2012), 583--588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rogers, Y. and Marsden, G. Does he take sugar': moving beyond the rhetoric of compassion. interactions 20, 4 (2013), 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Suchman, L. A. Practice-based design of information systems: Notes from the hyper-developed world. The information society 18, 2 (2002), 139--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor, P. Growing Old in America: Expectations vs. Reality. Pew Research Social & Demographic Trends Report. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Vines, J., Blythe, M., Lindsay, S., Dunphy, P., Monk, A. and Olivier, P. Questionable Concepts: Critique as a resource for designing with eighty somethings. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1169--1178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wallace, J., McCarthy, J., Wright, P.C. and Olivier, P. Making design probes work. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 3441--3450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A. and Downs, J. Older Adults as Digital Content Producers. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013), 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zickuhr, K and Madden, M. Older adults and internet use. Pew Report. pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Olderadults-and-internet-use.aspx (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Never too old: engaging retired people inventing the future with MaKey MaKey

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader