skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470662acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Older adults as digital content producers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Older adults are normally characterized as consumers, rather than producers, of digital content. Current research concerning the design of technologies for older adults typically focuses on providing access to digital resources. Access is important, but is often insufficient, especially when establishing new social relationships. This paper investigates the nature and role of digital content that has been created by older adults, for the purpose of forging new relationships. We present a unique field study in which seven older adults (aged 71-92 years), who did not know each other, used a prototype iPad application (Enmesh) to create and share photographs and messages. The findings demonstrate that older adults, even those in the \'1c"oldest old\'1d" age group, embraced opportunities to express themselves creatively through digital content production. We show that self-expression and social engagement with peers can be realized when socio-technical systems are suitably designed to allow older adults to create and share their own digital content.

References

  1. Bloch, N. and Bruce, B. C. Older adults and the new public sphere. In Proc. iConference 2011 (2011), 1--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Burmeister, O. K. What seniors value about online community. Community Informatics, 8, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Crawshaw, K. and Hendy, S. Older Victorians online: A community survey exploring the usage patterns of older Victorians online, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David, J., Benjamin, W., Baecker, R., Gromala, D. and Birnholtz, J. Living with pain, staying in touch: Exploring the communication needs of older adults with chronic pain. In Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM (2011), 1219--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proc. CSCW '92, ACM Press (1992), 107--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Garattini, C., Wherton, J. and Prendergast, D. Linking the lonely: an exploration of a communication technology designed to support social interaction among older adults. Univ. Acc. in the Inf. Soc., 11, 2 (2012), 211--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Bowers, J., Blythe, M., Jarvis, N., Cameron, D., Kerridge, T., Wilkie, A., Philliips, R. and Wright, P. The Photostroller: Supporting diverse care home residents in engaging with the world. In Proc. CHI '11, ACM Press (2011), 1757--1766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gibson, L., Moncur, W., Forbes, P., Arnott, J., Martin, C. and Bhachu, A. S. Designing social networking sites for older adults. In Proc. BCS '10, British Computer Society (2010), 186--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gutwin, C., Roseman, M. and Greenberg, S. A usability study of awareness widgets in a shared workspace groupware system. In Proc. CSCW '96, ACM Press (1996), 258--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hanson, V. L. Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interacting with Computers, 22, 6 (2010), 502--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Harley, D. and Fitzpatrick, G. YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927. Univ. Acc. in the Inf. Soc., 8, 1 (2009), 5--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Karahasanovic, A., Brandtzaeg, P. B., Heim, J., Luders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J. and Jans, G. Co-creation and usergenerated content - elderly people's user requirements. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25, 3 (2009), 655--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lehtinen, V., Nasanen, J. and Sarvas, R. "A little silly and empty-headed" - Older adults' understandings of social networking sites. In Proc. British HCI Conf., British Computer Society (2009), 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lindley, S. E., Harper, R. and Sellen, A. Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proc. British HCI Conf., British Computer Society (2008), 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lindley, S. E. Shades of lightweight: supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Univ. Acc. in the Inf. Soc., 11, 1 (2012), 31--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G. and Olivier, P. Engaging older people using participatory design. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 1199--1208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lindtner, S., Chen, J., Hayes, G. R. and Dourish, P. Towards a framework of publics: Re-encountering media sharing and its user. ACM Trans. Comput.Hum. Interact., 18, 2 (2011), 5.1--5.23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. McLaughlin, A. C., Rogers, W. A. and Fisk, A. D. Using direct and indirect input devices: Attention demands and age-related differences. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 16, 1 (2009), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Miller, A. D. and Edwards, W. K. Give and take: A study of consumer photo-sharing culture and practice. In Proc. CHI '07, ACM Press (2007), 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Nimrod, G. The fun culture in seniors' online communities. The Gerontologist, 51, 2 (2011), 226--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E. and Gruner, A. Social isolation of older people: the role of domestic technologies. In Proc. OzCHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 167--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Perry, M. and Rachovides, D. Entertaining Situated Messaging at Home. Comput. Supported Coop. Work, 16, 1-2 (2007), 99--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Hutchinson, H. B., Bederson, B. B. and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.,13, 3 (2006), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Preece, J. and Shneiderman, B. The reader-to-leader framework: Motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. on Hum.-Comput. Interact., 1, 1 (2009), 13--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Rodriguez, M. D., Gonzalez, V. M., Favela, J. and Santana, P. C. Home-based communication system for older adults and their remote family. Computers in Human Behaviour, 25, 3 (2009), 609--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Stößel, C., Wandke, H. and Blessing, L. Gestural interfaces for elderly users: Help or hindrance? In Gesture in Embodied Communication and HumanComputer Interaction. Springer, (2010), 269--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Thom-Santelli, J. and Millen, D. R. Learning by seeing: Photo viewing in the workplace. In Proc. CHI '09, ACM Press (2009), 2081--2090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. van Dijk, B., Dadlani, P., van Halteren, A. and Biemans, M. Life changes, connection stays: Photo sharing and social connectedness for people with special needs. In Proc. ECCE, ACM Press (2010), 135--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Vetere, F., Davis, H., Gibbs, M. and Howard, S. The Magic Box and Collage: Responding to the challenge of distributed intergenerational play. Int. J. Hum.Comput. Stud., 67, 2 (2009), 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Vines, J., Blythe, M., Lindsay, S., Dunphy, P., Monk, A. and Olivier, P. Questionable concepts: Critique as a resource for designing with eighty somethings. In Proc. CHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 1169--1178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Waycott, J., Pedell, S., Vetere, F., Ozanne, E., Kulik, L., Gruner, A. and Downs, J. Actively engaging older adults in the development and evaluation of tablet technology. In Proc. OzCHI '12, ACM Press (2012), 643--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Xie, B., Watkins, I., Golbeck, J. and Huang, M. Understanding and Changing Older Adults' Perceptions and Learning of Social Media. Educational Gerontology, 38, 4 (2012), 282--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Older adults as digital content producers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader