skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466473acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making design probes work

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Probes have been adopted with great enthusiasm in both Design and HCI. The heterogeneity with which they have been used in practice reflects how the method has proved elusive for many. Originators and commentators of probes have discussed misinterpretations of the method, highlighting the lack of accounts that describe in detail the design of probes and their use with participants. This paper discusses our particular use of Design Probes as directed craft objects that are both tools for design and tools for exploration across a number of projects, spanning a decade, centered on self-identity and personal significance. In offering an example of what a framework for probe design and use might look like, we attempt to address the identified lacuna, providing a synthetic account of probe design and use over an extended period and conceptualizing the relationship between the properties of probes and their use in design projects.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

chi1012-file3.mp4

mp4

88.6 MB

References

  1. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., and Dourish, P. How HCI interprets the probes. In Proc. CHI 2007. ACM Press (2007), 1077--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gaver, W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Gaver, W., Hooker, B., & Dunne, A. The Presence Project RCA CRD Projects series RCA Research Publications, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gaver, W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., and Walker, B. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions 11, 5 (2004), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Leitner, M., Cockton, G., Yee, J., and Greenough, T. The hankie probe: a materialistic approach to mobile ux research In Proc CHI EA '12 ACM Press (2012), 19191924. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mackay, W. E. 2004. The interactive thread. In Proc. DIS '04. NY: ACM Press, 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mattelmäki, T. and Battarbee, K. Empathy Probes. In Proc PDC2002 Malmo 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Mattelmäki, T. Design Probes. University of Art and Design Helsinki. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mauss, M. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. W. D. Halls, London: Routledge. ({1923--1924} 1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paulos, E. and Beckmann, C. 2006. Sashay. In Proc. CHI '06. NY: ACM Press, 881--884. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paz, O. In Praise of Hands: Contemporary Crafts of the World. New York Graphic Society. 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sennett, R. The Craftsman. Penguin Publishing, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wallace, J., Wright, P., McCarthy, J., Green, D., Thomas, J. and Olivier, P. A Design-led Inquiry into Personhood in Dementia. In Proc CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wallace, J., Thieme, A., Wood, G., Schofield, G. and Olivier, P. Enabling self, intimacy and a sense of home in dementia: an enquiry into design in a hospital setting. In Proc CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 2692--2638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wallace, J. and Press, M. All this useless beauty The Design Journal 7, 2 (2004), 42--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wallace, J. and Press, M. Craft knowledge for the digital age. In Proc 6th Asian Design Conference (2003), 14-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wright, P., Blythe, M., and McCarthy, J. User experience and the idea of design in HCI Interactive Systems. Design, Specification, and Verification Springer Berlin/Heidelberg (2006), 1--14 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making design probes work

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader