skip to main content
10.1145/3329189.3329192acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Never Stop Creating: A Preliminary Inquiry in Older Adults' Everyday Innovations

Published:20 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Participation in activities of personal interest and passion facilitates older adults' health and well-being. In this study, we investigated older adults' experiences related to their engagement and development of personal interests. We found out that older adults actively generated creative concepts and turned those ideas into innovative activities and artifacts, which positively revitalized a community, sustained an organization, and supported other people. Although any activity may be beneficial for older adults' health and well-being, we argue that everyday innovations play a particularly important role, and present an important opportunity to enhance their quality of life. We conclude by proposing design strategies to support everyday innovations to promote healthy aging.

References

  1. Ingrid Arreola, Zan Morris, Matthew Francisco, Kay Connelly, Kelly Caine, and Ginger White. 2014. From Checking on to Checking in: Designing for Low Socioeconomic Status Older Adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1933--1936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Robert C Atchley. 1980. The social forces in later life: An introduction to social gerontology. Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stinne Aaløkke Ballegaard, Thomas Riisgaard Hansen, and Morten Kyng. 2008. Healthcare in Everyday Life: Designing Healthcare Services for Daily Life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1807--1816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ann Bowling. 2008. Enhancing later life: how older people perceive active ageing? Aging and Mental Health 12, 3 (2008), 293--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Clara Caldeira, Matthew Bietz, Marisol Vidauri, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Senior Care for Aging in Place: Balancing Assistance and Independence. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1605--1617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. John M Carroll, Gregorio Convertino, Umer Farooq, and Mary Beth Rosson. 2012. The firekeepers: aging considered as a resource. Universal access in the information society 11, 1 (2012), 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sandra L Colby and Jennifer M Ortman. 2014. The baby boom cohort in the United States: 2012 to 2060. Population estimates and projections (2014), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Erin York Cornwell and Linda J Waite. 2009. Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of health and social behavior 50, 1 (2009), 31--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jeannette Durick, Toni Robertson, Margot Brereton, Frank Vetere, and Bjorn Nansen. 2013. Dispelling Ageing Myths in Technology Design. In Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration (OzCHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 467--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barney G Glaser and Anselm L Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alan J Gow, Alison Pattie, and Ian J Deary. 2017. Lifecourse activity participation from early, mid, and later adulthood as determinants of cognitive Aging: the Lothian birth cohort 1921. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B 72, 1 (2017), 25--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Julene K Johnson, Jukka Louhivuori, and Eero Siljander. 2017. Comparison of well-being of older adult choir singers and the general population in Finland: A case-control study. Musicae Scientiae 21, 2 (2017), 178--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Elizabeth Kaziunas, Mark S. Ackerman, Silvia Lindtner, and Joyce M. Lee. 2017. Caring Through Data: Attending to the Social and Emotional Experiences of Health Datafication. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2260--2272. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Amanda Lazar and David H. Nguyen. 2017. Successful Leisure in Independent Living Communities: Understanding Older Adults' Motivations to Engage in Leisure Activities. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7042--7056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Matthew L. Lee and Anind K. Dey. 2011. Reflecting on Pills and Phone Use: Supporting Awareness of Functional Abilities for Older Adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2095--2104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matthew L. Lee and Anind K. Dey. 2015. Sensor-based Observations of Daily Living for Aging in Place. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 19, 1 (Jan. 2015), 27--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bruce W Lemon, Vern L Bengtson, and James A Peterson. 1972. An exploration of the activity theory of aging: Activity types and life satisfaction among in-movers to a retirement community. Journal of gerontology 27, 4 (1972), 511--523.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Andrew R. McNeill, Lynne Coventry, Jake Pywell, and Pam Briggs. 2017. Privacy Considerations when Designing Social Network Systems to Support Successful Ageing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6425--6437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Verena H Menec. 2003. The relation between everyday activities and successful aging: A 6-year longitudinal study. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58, 2 (2003), S74--S82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Soud Nassir, Tuck Wah Leong, and Toni Robertson. 2015. Positive Ageing: Elements and Factors for Design. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 264--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Erdman Palmore. 1979. Predictors of successful aging. The Gerontologist 19, 5_Part_1 (1979), 427--431.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Leon A Pastalan. 1990. Aging in place: The role of housing and social supports. Vol. 6. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Daniela K. Rosner and Kimiko Ryokai. 2008. Spyn: Augmenting Knitting to Support Storytelling and Reflection. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 340--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jim Rowan and Elizabeth D. Mynatt. 2005. Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. John W Rowe and Robert L Kahn. 1997. Successful aging. The gerontologist 37, 4 (1997), 433--440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert B Tate, Leedine Lah, and T Edward Cuddy. 2003. Definition of successful aging by elderly Canadian males: The Manitoba follow-up study. The Gerontologist 43, 5 (2003), 735--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. James E Thornton. 2002. Myths of aging or ageist stereotypes. Educational gerontology 28, 4 (2002), 301--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kimiko Tomioka, Norio Kurumatani, and Hiroshi Hosoi. 2016. Relationship of having hobbies and a purpose in life with mortality, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling elderly adults. Journal of epidemiology 26, 7 (2016), 361--370.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lois M Verbrugge, Ann L Gruber-Baldini, and James L Fozard. 1996. Age differences and age changes in activities: Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 51, 1 (1996), S30--S41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Grayson K Vincent and Victoria Averil Velkoff. 2010. The next four decades: The older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050. Number 1138. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2015), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Xiying Wang, Tiffany Knearem, Fanlu Gui, Srishti Gupta, Haining Zhu, Michael Williams, and John M. Carroll. 2018. The Safety Net of Aging in Place: Understanding How Older Adults Construct, Develop, and Maintain Their Social Circles. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lu Xiao, Xueheng Yan, and Alison Emery. 2013. Design and evaluation of web interfaces for informal care providers in senior monitoring. In Proceedings of the 76th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries. American Society for Information Science, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chien Wen Yuan, Jessica Kropczynski, Richard Wirth, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M Carroll. 2017. Investigating older adults' social networks and coproduction activities for health. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 68--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Never Stop Creating: A Preliminary Inquiry in Older Adults' Everyday Innovations

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PervasiveHealth'19: Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
        May 2019
        475 pages
        ISBN:9781450361262
        DOI:10.1145/3329189

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader