skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979422acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social and technical challenges in parenting teens' social media use

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

With millions of teenagers on the Internet, millions of parents are trying to understand what their teens are doing and why. Understanding how technology use impacts teens' learning, growth, and social development is critical for their health and wellbeing and for the welfare of the family. Yet, balancing parent authority with teen privacy and autonomy is difficult. We conducted an interview study with 16 parents to examine challenges in "technoparenting" - parenting teens' technology use. Parents said they wanted more transparency in their teens' use of cell phones and the Internet and they struggled with their own unfamiliarity with technology. Technoparenting is a distributed problem and, surprisingly, parents wanted support and collaboration from the broader community. We conclude with design implications for a socially translucent "digital window".

References

  1. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. http://www.census.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, M. and Starr, B. Social activity indicators: Interface components for CSCW systems. In Proc. UIST 1995, ACM Press (1995), 159--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Baumrind, D. Prototypical Descriptions of 3 Parenting Styles. Psychology 37, 1966 (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. boyd, d. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics. PhD Diss., UC Berkeley, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. Academic Press, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruckman, A. Situated Support for Learning: Storm's Weekend with Rachael. JLS, 9, 3 (1999), 329--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brush, A. J. and Inkpen, K. M. Yours, mine and ours? sharing and use of technology in domestic environments. In Proc. UbiComp 2007, ACM Press (2007), 109--126. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Byrne, S. and Lee, T. Toward predicting youth resistance to internet risk prevention strategies. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 55, 1 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Czeskisy, A., Dermendjievay, I., Yapity, H., et al. Parenting from the Pocket: Value Tensions and Technical Directions for Secure and Private Parent-Teen Mobile Safety. In Proc. SOUPS '10 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Druin, A., Bederson, B. B., and Quinn, A. Designing intergenerational mobile storytelling. In Proc. IDC 2009, ACM Press, (2009), 325--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Durrant, A., Taylor, A. S., Frohlich, D., Sellen, A., and Uzzell, D. Photo displays and intergenerational relationships in the family home. BCS HCI, (2009), 10--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eastin, M. S., Greenberg, B. S., and Hofschire, L. Parenting the Internet. J. of Comm. 56, 3 (2006), 486--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Egelman, S., Brush, A. J., and Inkpen, K. Family Accounts: A new paradigm for user accounts within the home environment. In Proc CSCW '08, ACM Press (2008), 669--678. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Engestrom, Y. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W. Social translucence: an approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM TOCHI 7, 1 (2000), 59--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Frohlich, D. and Kraut, R. The Social Context of Home Computing. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company, New York, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Grinter, R. E., Edwards, W. K., Newman, M. W., and Ducheneaut, N. The work to make a home network work. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. (2005), 469--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Grinter, R. E., Palen, L., and Eldridge, M. Chatting with teenagers: Considering the place of chat technologies in teen life. TOCHI 13, 4 (2006), 423--447. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hargittai, E. Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the "Net Generation". Sociological Inquiry 80, 1 (2010), 92--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996), 67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ito, M., et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: living and learning with new media. MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Judge, T. K., Neustaedter, C., and Kurtz, A. F. The family window: the design and evaluation of a domestic media space. In Proc. CHI '10, ACM Press (2010), 655--658. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kientz, J., Arriaga, R., and Abowd, G. Baby steps: evaluation of a system to support record-keeping for parents of young children. In Proc CHI '09, ACM Press, (2009), 1713--1722. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., and Kraut, R. Troubles With the Internet: The Dynamics of Help at Home. Human-Computer Interaction 15, (2000), 323--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lenhart, A., Ling, R., Campbell, S., and Purcell, K. Teens and Mobile Phones. Pew Internet Project, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R., and Smith, A. Teens and Social Media. Pew Internet Project, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ling, R. and Yttri, B. Control, emancipation and status: The mobile telephone in the teen's parental and peer group control relationships. Info. Tech at Home. Oxford, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Livingstone, S. and Helsper, E. Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52, 4 (2008), 581--599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Maccoby, E. The role of parents in the socialization of children: An historical overview. Developmental Psychology 28, (1992), 1006--1017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Maccoby, E. E. and Martin, J. A. Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. Handbook of child psychology 4, (1983), 1--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Malamad, O. and Pop-Eleches, C. Home Computer Use and the Development of Human Capital. NBER Working Paper No. 15814, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mesch, G. Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. ICS 9, 4 (2006), 473--495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nardi, B. A., Kaptelinin, V., and Foot, K. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. The MIT Press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Nucci, L. P. and Lee, J. Morality and personal autonomy. In G. Noam and T. Wren, The Moral Self. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1993, 123--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rideout, V., Foehr, U., and Roberts, D. Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8- to 18-Year-Olds, KFF. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rode, J. A. Digital Parenting: Designing Children's Safety. BCS - People and Computers, (2009), 244--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Rosen, L., Cheever, N., and Carrier, L. The association of parenting style and child age with parental limit setting and adolescent MySpace behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6 (2008), 459--471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Smetana, J. G. and Asquith, P. Adolescents' and parents' conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child development 65, 4 (1994), 1147--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Smetana, J. G. Adolescents' and Parents' Conceptions of Parental Authority. Child development, 59 (1988), 321--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Voida, A., Voida, S., Greenberg, S., and He, H. A. Asymmetry in media spaces. In Proc. CSCW '08, ACM Press (2008), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Woodruff, A., Augustin, S., and Foucault, B. Sabbath Day Home Automation: "It's Like Mixing Technology and Religion." In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 527--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yarosh, S., Chew, Y., and Abowd, G. Supporting Parent-Child Communication in Divorced Families. Int'l. J. of Human Computer Studies 27, 2 (2009), 192--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social and technical challenges in parenting teens' social media use
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2011
        3530 pages
        ISBN:9781450302289
        DOI:10.1145/1978942

        Copyright © 2011 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 7 May 2011

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader