skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466446acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the abundance of research on social networking sites, relatively little research has studied those who choose not to use such sites. This paper presents results from a questionnaire of over 400 Internet users, focusing specifically on Facebook and those users who have left the service. Results show the lack of a clear, binary distinction between use and non-use, that various practices enable diverse ways and degrees of engagement with and disengagement from Facebook. Furthermore, qualitative analysis reveals numerous complex and interrelated motivations and justifications, both for leaving and for maintaining some type of connection. These motivations include: privacy, data misuse, productivity, banality, addiction, and external pressures. These results not only contribute to our understanding of online sociality by examining this under-explored area, but they also build on previous work to help advance how we conceptually account for the sociological processes of non-use.

References

  1. Baumer, E. P. S., & Silberman, M. S. (2011). When the Implication Is Not to Design (Technology). Proc CHI, 2271--2274. Vancouver, BC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.). (1989). The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Birnholtz, J. (2010). Adopt, adapt, abandon: Understanding why some young adults start, and then stop, using instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 6, 1427--1433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. DiMicco, J. M., & Millen, D. R. (2007). Identity management: multiple presentations of self in Facebook. Proc. GROUP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D'Orazio, D. (2012). Gmail now has 425 million total users. The Verge. June 28, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Facebook Newsroom. http://newsroom.fb.com/content/default.aspx?NewsAreaId=22. Accessed Sept 8, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gershon, I. (2011). Un-Friend My Heart: Facebook, Promiscuity, and Heartbreak in a Neoliberal Age. Anthropological Quarterly, 14, 4, 865--894.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Bately, M., & Lee, A. (2012). A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2, 561--569. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Joinson, A. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. Proc. CHI 2008, 1027--1036. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Karppi, T. (2011). Digital suicide and the biopolitics of leaving Facebook. Transformations, 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kline, R. (2003). Resisting Consumer Technology in Rural America: The Telephone and Electrification. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How Users Matter (pp. 51--66). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purrcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social networks sites. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (1994). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Madden, M. (2012). Privacy management on social media sites. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. McLaughlin, C., & Vitak, J. (2011). Norm evolution and violation on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 2, 299--315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pierce, J. (2012). Undesigning Technology: Considering the Negation of Design by Design. Proc CHI, 957--966. Austin, TX. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Portwood-Stacer, L. (forthcoming). Media Refusal and Conspicous Non-Consumption: The Performative and Political Dimensions of Facebook Abstention. New Media & Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Quit Facebook Day. http://www.quitfacebookday.com/. Accessed Sept 8, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rader, E., Wash, R., & Brooks, B. (2012). Stories as Informal Lessons about Security. Proc SOUPS. Washington, D.C. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rainie, L., Lenhart, A., & Smith, A. (2012). The tone of life on social networking sites. Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryan, T., & Xenos, S. (2011). Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 5, 1658--1664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Satchell, C., & Dourish, P. (2009). Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI. Proc. OZCHI 2009, 9--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ugander, J., Backstrom, L., Marlow, C., & Kleinberg, J. (2012). Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16), 5962--5966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Verdegem, P., & Verhoest, P. (2009). Profiling the nonuser: Rethinking policy initiatives stimulating ICT acceptance. Telecomm. Policy, 33, 10-11, 642--652. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wyatt, S. (2005). Non-users also matter: The construction of users and non-users of the Internet. In N. Oudshoorn & T. Pinch (Eds.), How users matter (pp. 67--79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhao, X., Sosik, V. S., & Cosley, D. (2012). It's Complicated: How Romantic Partners Use Facebook. Proc CHI, 771--780. Austin, TX. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader