ABSTRACT
Previous research has shown a relationship between use of social networking sites and feelings of social capital. However, most studies have relied on self-reports by college students. The goals of the current study are to (1) validate the common self-report scale using empirical data from Facebook, (2) test whether previous findings generalize to older and international populations, and (3) delve into the specific activities linked to feelings of social capital and loneliness. In particular, we investigate the role of directed interaction between pairs---such as wall posts, comments, and "likes" --- and consumption of friends' content, including status updates, photos, and friends' conversations with other friends. We find that directed communication is associated with greater feelings of bonding social capital and lower loneliness, but has only a modest relationship with bridging social capital, which is primarily related to overall friend network size. Surprisingly, users who consume greater levels of content report reduced bridging and bonding social capital and increased loneliness. Implications for designs to support well-being are discussed.
- Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology 94, S1 (1988), 95.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian J. of Clinical Psychology, 24 (1), 25--41.Google Scholar
- Economist.com (2009, Feb 26). Primates on Facebook. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13176775Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. JCMC 12(4).Google Scholar
- Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. J. of Social Issues, 58 (1), 49--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9), 1017--1031.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krosnick, J.A. (1999). Survey Research. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 1 (1999), 537--567.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Putnam, R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
- Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Rev. ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
- Russell D.W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale: reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. of Personality Assessment 66(1), 20--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schwarz N., Hippler H., Deutsch B., Strack F. (1985). Response scales: effects of category range on reported behavior and subsequent judgments. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 388--95Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shaw, L. & Gant, L. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5(2), 157--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B., and Lampe, C. Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, (2009), 245--254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. J. of Applied Developmental Psychology 29 (6).Google Scholar
- Valenzuela, S., Park, N., and Kee, K. (2009) Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. JCMC 14(4), 875--901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Williams, D. (2006). On and off the 'net: Scales for social capital in an online era. JCMC, 11(2), article 11.Google Scholar
- Zhao, S. Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. JCMC 11, 3 (2006), 844--862.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Social network activity and social well-being
Recommendations
Building social capital with Facebook: Type of network, availability of other media, and social self-efficacy matter#
Highlights- Type of friends affects building social capital via Facebook and traditional media.
AbstractFindings about Facebook's effect on relationships are mixed, possibly due to lack of models that acknowledge differences across users, types of their friends, and use of competing media. To address this, we proposed and tested how ...
Cultivating Social Resources on Social Network Sites: Facebook Relationship Maintenance Behaviors and Their Role in Social Capital Processes
This study explores the relationship between perceived bridging social capital and specific Facebook-enabled communication behaviors using survey data from a sample of U.S. adults N=614. We explore the role of a specific set of Facebook behaviors that ...
The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being
Using a two-wave panel in Hong Kong, this study examines how different uses of mobile social media contribute to individuals' social capital and psychological well-being. Findings showed that communicative use and self-disclosure on mobile social media ...
Comments