skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753613acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social network activity and social well-being

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown a relationship between use of social networking sites and feelings of social capital. However, most studies have relied on self-reports by college students. The goals of the current study are to (1) validate the common self-report scale using empirical data from Facebook, (2) test whether previous findings generalize to older and international populations, and (3) delve into the specific activities linked to feelings of social capital and loneliness. In particular, we investigate the role of directed interaction between pairs---such as wall posts, comments, and "likes" --- and consumption of friends' content, including status updates, photos, and friends' conversations with other friends. We find that directed communication is associated with greater feelings of bonding social capital and lower loneliness, but has only a modest relationship with bridging social capital, which is primarily related to overall friend network size. Surprisingly, users who consume greater levels of content report reduced bridging and bonding social capital and increased loneliness. Implications for designs to support well-being are discussed.

References

  1. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology 94, S1 (1988), 95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Diener, E., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (1997). Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian J. of Clinical Psychology, 24 (1), 25--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Economist.com (2009, Feb 26). Primates on Facebook. The Economist. http://www.economist.com/sciencetechnology/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13176775Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. JCMC 12(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, (2009), 211--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet Paradox Revisited. J. of Social Issues, 58 (1), 49--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53 (9), 1017--1031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Krosnick, J.A. (1999). Survey Research. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 1 (1999), 537--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Putnam, R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image (Rev. ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Russell D.W. (1996). UCLA loneliness scale: reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. of Personality Assessment 66(1), 20--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Schwarz N., Hippler H., Deutsch B., Strack F. (1985). Response scales: effects of category range on reported behavior and subsequent judgments. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 388--95Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Shaw, L. & Gant, L. (2002). In defense of the Internet: The relationship between Internet communication and depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and perceived social support. CyberPsychology & Behavior 5(2), 157--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B., and Lampe, C. Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies, (2009), 245--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. J. of Applied Developmental Psychology 29 (6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Valenzuela, S., Park, N., and Kee, K. (2009) Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation. JCMC 14(4), 875--901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Williams, D. (2006). On and off the 'net: Scales for social capital in an online era. JCMC, 11(2), article 11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhao, S. Do Internet users have more social ties? A call for differentiated analyses of Internet use. JCMC 11, 3 (2006), 844--862.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Social network activity and social well-being

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2010
          2690 pages
          ISBN:9781605589299
          DOI:10.1145/1753326

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 April 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader