Q. Vera Liao
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Older adults are a notable group among the exponentially growing population of online health information consumers. In order to better support older adults’ health-related information seeking on the Internet, it is important to understand how they judge the credibility of such information when compared to younger users. We conducted two laboratory studies to explore how the credibility cues in message contents, website features, and user-generated comments differentially impact younger (19 to 26 years of age) and older adults’ (58 to 80 years of age) credibility judgments. Results from the first experiment showed that older adults were less sensitive to the credibility cues in message contents and those in website features than younger adults. Verbal protocol analysis revealed that these differences could be caused by the higher tendency of older adults to passively accept web information, and their lack of deliberation on its quality and attention towards contextual web features (e.g., design look, source identity). In the second experiment, we studied how credibility cues from user reviews might differentially impact older and younger adults’ credibility judgments of online health information. Results showed that consistent credibility cues in user reviews and message contents could facilitate older adults’ credibility judgments. When the two were inconsistent, older adults, as compared to younger ones, were less swayed by highly appraising user reviews given to low credibility information. These results provided important implications for designing health information technologies that better fit the older population.
- F. Alsudani and M. Casey. 2009. The Effect of Aesthetics on Web Credibility. In Proc. 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers. 512--519. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- M. Cheung, C. Choon, C. Sia, and H. Chen. 2009. Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 13, 4 (2009), 9--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Chin and W.-T. Fu. 2010. Interactive effects of age and interface differences on search strategies and performance. In Proc. CHI 2010. ACM, 403--412. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. B. Cialdini and N. Goldstein. 2004. Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity. Annual Review of Psychology 55 (2004), 591--621.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Cosley, S. K. Lam, I. Albert, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. 2003. Is Seeing Believing?: How Recommender System Interfaces Affect Users’ Opinions. In Proc. CHI 2003. 585--592. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. J. Czaja et al. Older Adults and Internet Health Information Seeking. In Proc. HFES 2009. 126--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Chung, E. L Fink, and S. A. Kaplowitz. 2008. The Comparative Statics and Dynamics of Beliefs: The Effect of Message Discrepancy and Source Credibility. Communication Monographs 2, (2008), 158--189.Google Scholar
- M. J. Dutta-Bergman. 2004. The Impact of Completeness and Web Use Motivation on the Credibility of e-Health Information. Journal of Communication 54, 2 (2004), 253--269.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. H. Dutton and A. Shepherd. 2006. Trust in the Internet as an Experience Technology. Information, Communication & Society 9, 4 (2006), 433--451.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. A. Ericsson and H. A. Simon. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Eysenbach. 2008. Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspectives and Implications for Youth. In Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin, eds. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 123--154.Google Scholar
- G. Eysenbach et al. 2002. Empirical Studies Assessing the Quality of Health Information for Consumers on the World Wide Web: A Systematic Review. JAMA 287, 20 (2002), 2691--2700.Google Scholar
- G. Eysenbach, E. R. Sa, and T. L. Diepgen. 1999. Shopping Around the Internet Today and Tomorrow: Towards the Millennium of Cybermedicine. British Medical Journal 319, 1294 (1999), 1--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. G. Fairweather. 2008. How Older and Younger Adults Differ in Their Approach to Problem Solving on a Complex Website. In Proc. SIGACCESS 2008. ACM, 67--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Ferebee. 2007. An Examination of the Influence of Involvement Level of Web Site Users on the Perceived Credibility of Web Sites. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer-Verlag, 176--186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Flanagin and M. Metzger. 2000. Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. Journalism and Mass Comunication 77, 3 (2000), 515--549.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. J. Fogg. 2003. Prominence-Interpretation Theory: Explaining How People Assess Credibility Online. In Proc. CHI 2003. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. J. Fogg et al. 2001. What Makes Web Sites Credible?: A Report on a Large Quantitative Study. In Proc. CHI 2001. ACM, 61--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and A. Firl. 2007. Google and the Mind: Predicting Fluency with PageRank. Psychological Science 18, 12 (2007), 1069--1076.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Hamilton. 1998. Message Variables That Mediate and Moderate the Effect of Equivocal Language on Source Credibility. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17, 1 (1998), 109--143.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. L. Hanson. 2009. Cognition, Age, and Web Browsing. In Proc. UAHCI 2009. Springer-Verlag, 245--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Hargittai, L. Fullerton, E. Menchen-Trevino, and K. Thmoas. 2010. Trust Online: Young Adults’ Evaluation of Web Content. International Journal of Communication 4 (2010), 468--494.Google Scholar
- B. Jr Hayslip and H. L. Sterns. 1979. Age Differences in Relationships Between Crystallized and Fluid Intelligences and Problem Solving. Journal of Gerontology 34, 3 (1979), 404--414.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Hilligoss and S. Y. Rieh. 2008. Developing a Unifying Framework of Credibility Assessment: Construct, Heuristics, and Interaction in Context. Information Processing & Management 44, 4 (2008), 1467--1484. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Hong. 2006. The influence of structural and message features on Web site credibility. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57. 1 (2006), 114--127. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hullman, A. Eytan, and P. Shah. 2011. The Impact of Social Information on Visual Judgments. In Proc. CHI 2011. 1461--1470. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. W. Jones, R. C. Sinclair, and K. S. Courneya. 2003. The Effects of Source Credibility and Message Framing on Exercise Intentions, Behaviors, and Attitudes: An Integration of the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Prospect Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 33, 1 (2003), 179--196.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Kunst, D. Groot, P. M. Latthe, M. Latthe, and K. S. Khan. 2002. Accuracy of Information on Apparently Credible Websites: Survey of Five Common Health Topics. British Medical Journal 324, (2002), 581--582.Google Scholar
- C. Lewis and R. Mack. 1982. Learning to Use a Text Processing System: Evidence from “Thinking Aloud” Protocols. In Proc. Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 387--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159--174.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Q. V. Liao. 2010. Effects of Cognitive Aging on Credibility Assessment of Online Health Information. In Ext. Abstract CHI 2010. ACM, 4321--4326. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. J. Metzger. 2007. Making Sense of Credibility on the Web: Models for Evaluating Online Information and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58, 13 (2007), 2078--2091. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Newell and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving (Vol. 14). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. O’Grady. 2006. Future Directions for Depicting Credibility in Health Care Web Sites. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75, 1, 58--65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Peters et al. 2007. Adult Age Differences in Dual Information Processes: Implications for the Role of Affective and Deliberative Processes in Older Adults’ Decision Making. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2, 1 (2007), 1--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo. 1986. The Elaboration Likelihood Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19, 123--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. W. Phillips and B. Sternthal. 1977. Age Differences in Information Processing: A Perspective on the Aged Consumer. Journal of Marketing Research 14, 4 (1977), 444--457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Y. Rieh. 2007. Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (2007), 307--364. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Sakamoto. 2010. The Impact of Collective Opinion on Online Judgment. In Proc. 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
- M. J. Salganik, P. S. Dodds, and D. J. Watts. 2006. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science 311, 5762 (2006), 854--856.Google Scholar
- T. A. Salthouse. 1991. Mediation of Adult Age Differences in Cognition by Reductions in Working Memory and Speed of Processing. Psychological Science 2, 179--183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Schwarz and M. Morris. 2011. Augmenting Web Pages and Search Results to Support Credibility Assessment. In Proc. CHI 2011. ACM, 1245--1254. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Shon, J. Marshall, and M. A. Musen. 2000. The Impact of Displayed Awards on the Credibility and Retention of Web Site Information. In Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000. 794--798.Google Scholar
- J. Sharit et al. 2008. Investigating the Roles of Knowledge and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adult Information Seeking on the Web. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 1 (2008), 1--25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Sillence et al. 2006. A Framework for Understanding Trust Factors in Web-based Health Advice. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 8 (2006), 697--713. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Sillence et al. 2007. How Do Patients Evaluate and Make Use of Online Health Information? Social Science & Medicine 64, 9 (2007), 1853--1862.Google Scholar
- S. S. Sundar. 2007. Technology and Credibility: Cognitive Heuristics Cued by Modality, Agency, Interactivity and Navigability. In M. Metzger and A. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital Media, Youth and Credibility. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 73--100.Google Scholar
- S. F. Sydney. 2009. Generations Online in 2009, Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
- C. L. Toma. 2010. Perceptions of Trustworthiness Online: The Role of Visual and Textual Information. In Proc. CSCW 2010. ACM, 13--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Tseng and B. J. Fogg. 1999. Credibility and Computing Technology. Communication 42, 5 (1999), 39--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Unsworth, R. Heitz, J. Schrock, and R. Engle. 2005. An Automated Version of the Operation Span Task. Behavior Research Methods 37, 498--505.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. B. Walther, Z. Wang, and T. Loh. 2004. The Effect of Top-Level Domains and Advertisements on Health Web Site Credibility. Journal of Medical Internet Research 6, 3 (2004), e24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. N. Wathen and J. Burkell. 2002. Believe It or Not: Factors Influencing Credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53, 2 (2002), 134--144. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Yamamoto and K. Tanaka. 2011. Enhancing Credibility Judgment of Web Search Results. In Proc. CHI 2011. ACM, 1235--1244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Yoon, C. Cole, and M. Lee. 2009. Consumer Decision Making and Aging: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (2009), 2--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Zhu, B. Huberman, and Y. Luon. 2012. To Switch or Not to Switch: Understanding Social Influence in Online Choices. In Proc. CHI 2012. 2257--2266. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Age differences in credibility judgments of online health information
Recommendations
Older Adults' Evaluation of the Credibility of Online Health Information
CHIIR '20: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalEvaluating the quality of online health information is one of the most significant challenges that older adults face in using the internet to inform their healthcare. In this exploratory study, we observed four older adults with distinctive backgrounds ...
Age differences in credibility judgment of online health information
IHI '12: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics SymposiumTo better support older adults' consumption of high quality health information on the Internet, it is important to understand how older adults make credibility judgments with online health information. For this purpose, we conducted two laboratory ...
How user reviews influence older and younger adults' credibility judgments of online health information
CHI EA '11: CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA laboratory study was conducted to explore whether user reviews, a common Web 2.0 feature on healthcare website, would have differential influence on younger and older adults' judgment of information credibility. We found that when credibility cues in ...
Comments