ABSTRACT
People increasingly rely on social networking websites to initiate personal and professional relationships. This requires that a considerable amount of trust be placed in strangers solely on the basis of their online profiles. This paper examines how the nature of online information affects how trustworthy online daters are perceived. Visual (i.e., photographs) and textual (i.e., "about me" section) information is considered. Results show that textual information elicits the highest ratings of trustworthiness, and that the addition of a photograph decreases daters' perceived trustworthiness. However, the accuracy of trustworthiness impressions is low regardless of the type of information available, because of a truth bias. Results are discussed in terms of (1) hyperpersonal impression formation and the nature of truth bias; and (2) practical implications for building trustworthiness online.
- Bond, J. F., Berry, D. S., & Omar, A. (1994). The kernel of truth in judgments of deceptiveness. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 523--534.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bos, N., Olson, J. S., Gergle, D., Olson, G. M., & Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer mediated communications channels on trust development. In: Proceedings of CHI 2002, (pp. 135--140). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Burgoon, J.K., Stoner, G.M., Bonito, J.A., and Dunbar, N.E. (2003). Trust and deception in mediated communication. Proceedings of HICSS, 2003, pp. 44--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Corritore, C. L., Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58, 737--758. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Marketing Science, 32, 554--571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Davis, J. P., Farnham, S. D., & Jensen, C. (2002). Decreasing online 'bad' behavior. In: Extended Abstracts of CHI 2002, (pp. 718--719). New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, article 2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/ellison.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Hancock, J. T., & Dunham, P. J. (2001). Impression formation in computer-mediated environments revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating profile photographs. Journal of Communication, 59, 367--386.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Penton-Voak, I.S., Pound, N., Little, A.C., & Perrett, D.I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: more evidence for a 'kernel of truth' in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 490--524.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riegelsberger, J. (2005). Trust in mediated interactions. Dissertation submitted to the University College, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. (2003). The Researcher's Dilemma: Evaluating Trust in Computer-Mediated Communication. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58, 759--781. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rocco, E. (1998). Trust Breaks Down in Electronic Contexts but Can Be Repaired by Some Initial Face-to-Face Contact. In: Proceedings of CHI 1998, (pp. 496--502). New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651--665.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scissors, L. E., Gill, A. J., Geraghty, K., & Gergle, D. (2009). In CMC we trust: The role of similarity. CHI '09: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA. 527--536. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/ avoidance behaviors. In A. Kingstone & M. Miller (Eds.), The Year in Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208--224.Google Scholar
- Toma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023--1036.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vrij, A. (2000) Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
- Walther, J. B., Slovacek, C., & Tidwell, L. C. (2001). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Communication Research, 28, 105--134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walther. J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 1--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 16--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zheng, J., Olson, J. S., Bos, N., Olson, G. M., & Veinott, E. (2002). Trust without Touch: Jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. In: Proceedings of CHI2002, (pp. 141--146). New York, NY: ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Perceptions of trustworthiness online: the role of visual and textual information
Recommendations
Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers
Trust is emerging as a potentially central aspect leading to IT acceptance. It is especially needed in the case of gaining and later retaining consumers of online vendors. This has been shown by previous research using single dimensional constructs. But ...
Perceived Trustworthiness Within the Organization: The Moderating Impact of Communication Frequency on Trustor and Trustee Effects
This paper investigates the antecedents of intraorganizational trust and, more specifically, how the frequency of communication between trustor and trustee moderates the impact of these factors on perceived trustworthiness. Data on 157 dyadic ...
Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business
Why do top movie reviewers receive invitations to exclusive screenings? Even popular technology bloggers get free new gadgets for reviewing. How much do these reviewers really matter for businesses? While the impact of online reviews on sales of ...
Comments