skip to main content
10.1145/1414471.1414485acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How older and younger adults differ in their approach to problem solving on a complex website

Published:13 October 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Older adults differ from younger ones in the ways they experience the World Wide Web. For example, they tend to move from page to page more slowly, take more time to complete tasks, make more repeated visits to pages, and take more time to select link targets than their younger counterparts. These differences are consistent with the physical and cognitive declines associated with aging. The picture that emerges has older adults doing the same sorts of things with websites as younger adults, although less efficiently, less accurately and more slowly. This paper questions that view. We present new findings that show that, to accomplish their purposes, older adults may systematically undertake different activities and use different parts of websites than younger adults. We examined how a group of adults 18 to 73 years of age moved through a complex website seeking to solve a specific problem. We found that the users exhibited strong age--related tendencies to follow particular paths and visit particular zones while in pursuit of a common goal. We also assessed how experience with the web may mediate these tendencies. We conclude the paper with a discussion of the implications of the finding that users' characteristics not only affect how they navigate but what activities they undertake along the way.

References

  1. Profile of older Americans. J. Anderson. Rules of the Mind. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. U. C. Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2008, page 719. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Chadwick-Dias, D. Tedesco, and T. Tullis. Older adults and web usability: Is web experience the same as web expertise? In CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1391--1394. ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Craik and T. A. Salthouse. Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. J. Czaja and C. C. Lee. The internet and older adults: Design challenges and opportunities. In N. Charness, D. C. Parks, and B. A. Sabel, editors, Communication, technology, and aging: Opportunities and challenges, chapter The Internet and older adults: Design challenges and opportunities, pages 60--78. Springer, New York, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Grahame, M. LaBerge and C. T. Scialfa. Age differences in search of web pages: The effects of link size, link number, and clutter. Human Factors, 46(3):385---398, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. Gregor and A. F. Newell. Designing for dynamic diversity -- making accessible interfaces for older people. In Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly, pages 90--92, Alcacer do Sal:Portuga, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. A. Hart and B. S. Chaparro. Evaluation of websites for older adults: How 'senior-friendly' are they?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. C. Laberge and C. T. Scialfa. Predictors of web navigation performance in a life span sample of adults: Aging and human performance. Human Factors, 47(2):289--302, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. T. Lee. Web usability: A review of the research. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 31(1), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Lee and J. Kim. Has the internet changed the wage structure too?, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Meyer, R. A. Sit, S. E. M. Spaulding, and N. Walker. Age group diferences in world wide web navigation. In S. Pemberton, editor, CHI '97 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems: looking to the future, volume 2, pages 295--296, New York, 1997. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. C. Park. The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. Park and N. Schwartz, editors, Cognitive Aging: A Primer, chapter The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. Taylor and Francis, New York, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. L. Rogers. Measuring online experience: It's about more than time!, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. A. Salthouse. Constraints on theories of cognitive aging. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3(3):287--299, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Sweller. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4):295--312, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. How older and younger adults differ in their approach to problem solving on a complex website

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Mariana Damova

    Treating an interesting topic of increasing importance, Fairweather describes a thoroughly designed and well-executed experiment, giving a straightforward answer to the question posed. The goal of the proposed research is to investigate how the Web is being browsed by groups of different ages and competence levels. Contrary to the expectation that older adults would do the same things as young adults, only slower and less efficiently, the paper concludes that the difference is actually in the way the Web is approached by the two selected groups; for example, older adults navigate the Web with different activities than young adults. The experiment comprises 28 subjects of ages between 18 and 73. The main hypothesis to be validated is that the activities of younger and older Web users will differ when local, short-term, and non-goal-oriented behaviors are concerned. The difference in behavior is noticeable when browsing complex sites with alternative paths to the same destination. This is based on the evidence that older adults have to compensate for age-related cognitive deficits, such as attention span, working memory, reaction time, and information processing speed. The subjects of the experiment were given a problem-solving task and an identical Web environment. The navigation patterns of the participants were observed in a very detailed and seamless manner, building graphs of the taken paths. The results of the experiment show that older adults would go down paths with detailed step-by-step guidance through the browsing process and would persevere when obtaining unsatisfactory answers until finding the good ones. The activities undertaken by older or younger adults, as well as by more or less experienced Web users did not affect the success of the problem solving. The percentage of subjects who completed the task successfully was 46.4 percent, whereas 53.6 percent failed to complete the assignment, with no correlation to age or experience. Thus, the main conclusion of the experiment is that different age groups, when working on similar tasks, perform different activities on the Web without impacting the success of the task resolution. This observation is seen as an important hint and instrument for Web page designers, indicating the need for Web-user-segment-centric Web page design. An interesting contribution to human factor research, with a wealth of relevant references, this paper is a curious finding and initiation into user analytics, geared toward Web page design. It would be of interest to see the results of such experiments performed on a larger subject base. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      Assets '08: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
      October 2008
      332 pages
      ISBN:9781595939760
      DOI:10.1145/1414471

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 October 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader