skip to main content
10.1145/1738826.1738848acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dissolving boundaries: social technologies and participation in design

Published:23 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emphasis on participation in social technologies challenges some of our traditional assumptions about the role of users and designers in design. It also exposes some of the limitations and assumptions about design embedded in our traditional models and methods. Based on a review of emerging practice we present four perspectives on design in the context of social technologies. By presenting this 'lay of the land', we seek to contribute to ongoing work on the nature of participation and design in the context of social technologies. We draw particular attention to the ways in which roles and responsibilities in design are being reassigned and redistributed. As traditional boundaries between design and use and designer and user dissolve, design is becoming more public. In the context of social technologies design is moving out into the wild.

References

  1. Antikainen, M. & Vääätäjä, H. Rewarding in open innovation communities --How to motivate members? XIX ISPIM Annual Conference. Open Innovation: Creating Products and Services through Collaboration, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balka, E. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. PDC'06, ACM Press, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Battarbee, K. Co-experience: the social user experience. CHI'03, ACM Press, (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Battarbee, K. & Kurvinen, E. Supporting creativity - co-experience in MMS. The Good, the Bad & the Irrelevant - the user and the future of information and communication technologies. COST269, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. & Stååhlbröst, A. Participatory design: one step back or two steps forward. PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Binder, T., Brandt, E. & Gregory, J. Design participation(-s) (Editorial). CoDesign, 4, (2008) 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bødker, S. When Second Wave HCI meets Third Wave Challenges. Nordichi 2006, ACM Press, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Botero, A. & Saad-Sulonen, J. Co-designing for new city-citizen interaction possibilities: weaving prototypes and interventions in the design and development of Urban Mediator. PDC'09, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boulton, M. Drupal.org, Design Iterations, and Designing in the open. (2008), (http://www.markboulton.co.uk/journal/comments/drupalorg_design_iterations_and_designing_in_the_open/ Accessed December (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd, D. Revenge of the Social Network: Lessons from Friendster. (2005), http://www.danah.org/papers/2005.0204.Stanford.txt Accessed August (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyd, D. Social Network Sites: Public, Private, or What? (2007a), http://www.danah.org/papers/KnowledgeTree.pdf. Accessed August 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Boyd, D. The Significance of Social Software. IN Schmidt, T. N. B. A. J. (Ed.) BlogTalks Reloaded: Social Software Research & Cases Norderstedt, (2007b).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd, D. Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics, Phd Thesis. Information Management and Systems. Berkeley, University of California, (2009a).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyd, D. Social Media is Here to Stay... Now What? (2009b), http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/MSRTechFest2009. html Accessed March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Brabham, D. C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, 14, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Brereton, M. & Buur, J. New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. CoDesign, 4, (2008) 101--113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Burka, D. Changing successfully: Adapting your interface over time. (2008), http://www.webdirections.org/resources/daniel-burka-interaction-design-case-studies/#slides Accessed December 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chesbrough, H. W. Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology, Harvard Business School Press, (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Clement, A., Costantino, T., Kurtz, D., & Tissenbaum, M. Participatory Design and Development of Web 2.0 Sites: The case of PIPWatch - the collaborative privacy enhancing and accountability toolbar. PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Corbin Twitter Reverses on Reply Tweak After Backlash. (2009), http://www.internetnews.com/webcontent/article.php/3820256/Twitter+Reverses+on+Reply+Tweak+After+Backlash.htm Accessed May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cruickshank, L. & Evans, M. Media Communication, Consumption and Use: The Changing Role of the Designer. DRS 2008, Design Research Society, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, M. Why Do We Need Doctoral Study in Design? International Journal of Design, 2, (2008) 71--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Disalvo, C., Maki, J. & Martin, N. Mapmover: a case study of design-oriented research into collective expression and constructed publics. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dourish, P. Where the Action Is, MIT Press, (2001).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ehn, P. Work-Orientated Design of Computer Artifacts, Stockholm, Arbetslivscentrum, (1988). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ehn, P. Participation in Design Things. PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Engeström, J. Why some social network services work and others don't --- Or: the case for object-centered sociality, August (2005) http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why_some_social.html Accessed Sept 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Fischer, G. Rethinking Software Design in Participation Cultures Automated Software Engineering, 15, (2008) 365--377. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Fischer, G. & Giaccardi, E. Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development. IN Lieberman, H., Paternòò, F. & Wulf, V. (Eds.) End User Development --- Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hagen, P., Robertson, T., Kan, M., et al. Emerging Research Methods for Understanding Mobile Technology Use. OZCHI'05, ACM Press, (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Haikara, J. Usability in Agile Software Development: Extending the Interaction Design Process with Personas Approach. IN Concas, G., Damiani, E. & Scotto, M. (Eds.) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Hart, J., Ridley, C., Taher, F., et al. Exploring the facebook experience: a new approach to usability. In Proc NordiChi'08, ACM Press New York, NY, USA, (2008) 471--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Heinonen, S. & Halonen, M. Making Sense of Social Media Interviews and Narratives. IN SOMED Foresight Report 2, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Henderson, A. & Kyng, M. There is no place like Home: Continuing Design in Use. IN Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (Eds.) Design at Work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hess, J., Offenberg, S. & Pipek, V. Community-Driven Development as participation? - Involving User Communities in a Software Design Process. PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Holzapfel, N. An unsuitable match: social media and User-Centred design. 2008, http://johnnyholland.org/magazine/2008/11/an-unsuitable-match-social-media-and-user-centred-design/ Accessed December (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Horst, P. G. L., Mahendran, D., Martinez, K., et al. Hanging Out, Messing Around, Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media, Cambridge: MIT Press, ForthcomingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Howe, J. The Rise of Crowdsourcing, (2006) http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html Accessed May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Howe, J. Crowdsourcing: Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business, Crown Publishing Group New York, NY, USA, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild, MIT, (1995).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ingbert, R. F., Jones, M. C., Rathi, D., et al. Web Mashups and Patchwork Prototyping: User-driven technological innovation with Web 2.0 and Open Source Software. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Isbister, K. & Hööök, K. On being supple: in search of rigor without rigidity in meeting new design and evaluation challenges for HCI practitioners. 27th annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Joinson, A. N. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Proceeding of the 26th annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Jones, M. C., Floyd, I. R. & Twidale, M. B. Patchwork Prototyping with Open Source Software. IN St. Amant, K. & Still, B. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Open Source Software: Technological, Economic, and Social Perspectives. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA, Information Science Reference. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Karasti, H. & Syrjäänen, A.-L. Artful Infrastructuring in Two Cases of Community PD. PDC'04, ACM Press, (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lee, Y. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign, 4, (2008) 31--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Lievrouw, L. A. Oppositional and activist new media: remediation, reconfiguration, participation. PDC'06, ACM Press, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Merholz, P. Embrace the chaos - designers and systems with emergent behavior. (2006) http://www.peterme.com/archives/000793.html Accessed March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Näkki, P., Antikainen, M. & Virtanen, T. Participatory Design in an Open Web Laboratory Owela. CHI08, ACM Press, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Näkki, P. & Virtanen, T. Utilising social media tools in user-centred design. CHI2007 workshop: "Supporting non-professional users in the new media landscape. CHI 07, ACM Press, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. O'reilly, T. What Is Web 2.0. (2005) http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html?page=1 Accessed March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Pierson, J., Mante-Meijer, E., Loos, E., et al. (Eds.) Innovating for and by users. COST, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter, J. The Freedom of Fast Iterations: How Netflix Designs a Winning Web Site. (2006) http://www.uie.com/articles/fast_iterations/3/1/08 Accessed March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. & Sharp, H. Interaction Design, beyond human-computer interaction, NY, John Wiley & Sons, (2002). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Redhead, F. & Brereton, M. Getting to the Nub of Neighbourhood Interaction. PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Reichelt, L. Openness and Effectiveness in Designing with a Community, April (2009) http://www.disambiguity.com/openness-and-effectiveness/ Accessed May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Robertson, T., Mansfield, T. & Loke, L. Designing an immersive environment for public use. PDC'06, ACM Press, (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (Eds.) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, (1993). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Shirky, C. Social Software and the Politics of Groups. (2003), http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_politics.html Accessed May 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Shirky, C. Here comes everybody, Penguin Press (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Sinha, R. 10 lessons from the design of SlideShare. (2007), http://www.slideshare.net/rashmi/10-lessons-from-the-design-of-slideshare Accessed June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Spool, J. M. Learning from the Facebook Mini-Feed Disaster. (2007), http://www.uie.com/articles/facebook_mini_feed/ Accessed May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Suchman, L. A. Plans and Situated Actions: The problem of human machine communication Cambridge. University Press, (1987). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Threadless www.threadless.com Accessed March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Twidale, M. B. & Floyd, I. R. Infrastructures From the Bottom-Up and the Top-Down: Can They Meet in the Middle? PDC'08, ACM Press, (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Von Hippel, E. User toolkits for innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, (2001) 247--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Ye, Y. & Fischer, G. Designing for Participation in Socio-Technical Software Systems. In Proc 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Springer, (2007) 312--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dissolving boundaries: social technologies and participation in design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      OZCHI '09: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7
      November 2009
      445 pages
      ISBN:9781605588544
      DOI:10.1145/1738826

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 November 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      OZCHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate32of60submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader