skip to main content
10.1145/1147261.1147281acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda

Published:01 August 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Shapiro [38] recently argued that participatory design practitioners should consider pursuing a reformist agenda through engagement with the procurement and development of systems in the public sector. This paper considers the challenges, contradictions and possible arenas for success in the context of a reformist participatory design agenda [38], by reflecting on recent work undertaken from a stance similar to that advocated by Shapiro [38] in a public sector agency. The intention of the paper is to stimulate and extend discussion about arenas in which the political goals that characterized participatory design in its early days can be pursued, and extend discussions about the role of politics in contemporary participatory design [14].

References

  1. Balka, E. Tidying up loose ends: Theoretical and practical issues related to women's participation in technological design. In H. Rohracher (Ed.), User Involvement in Technological Innovation, Profil-Verlag, Munich, 2005, 147--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balka, E. The Production of Health Indicators as Computer Supported Cooperative Work: Reflections on the Multiple Roles of Electronic Health Records. In Balka, E. and Wagner, I. (Eds.). Reconfiguring Healthcare: Issues in Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Healthcare Environments, (2005), 67--75Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Balka, E. Notes taken at presentation about the system upgrade, March 18 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Balka, E. Feminist Technology Assessment: Reflections on Theory and Practice. Atlantis 22, 2 (1998), 112--122.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Balka, E. Computer Networking: Spinsters on the Web. Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women, Ottawa (1997a).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Balka, E. Participatory Design in Women's Organizations: The Social World of Organizational Structure and the Gendered Nature of Expertise. Gender, Work and Organizations 4, 2 (1997b), 99--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Balka, E. Women's access to on-line discussions about feminism. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue Electronique de Communication 3, 1 (1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Balka, E. and Doucette, L. The accessibility of computers to organizations serving women in the province of Newfoundland: Preliminary study results. Electronic Journal of Virtual Culture 2, 3 (1994), 739 lines.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Balka, E., Jones, M., Jorgenson, L. and Sinclair, N. Participatory Design with Island Pacific School: Lessons from the Field, Unpublished paper (1998). http:/pdg.cecm.sfu.ca/IPS/PDC.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Balka, E. and Kahnamoui, N. Technology trouble? Talk to us! Findings from an ethnographic field study. Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2004, Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices -- Volume 1, New York, NY, ACM Press (2004), 224--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Balka, E., Kahnamoui, N. and Nutland K. Who's in Charge of Patient Safety? Work Practice, Work Processes and Utopian Views of Automatic Drug Dispensing Systems. Proc. Technology in Healthcare, To Err is System, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Balka, E., Wagner, I. and Jensen, C. B. Reconfiguring Critical Computing in an Era of Configurability. In. Bertelsen, O. W., Bouvin, N. O., Krough, P. G. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). Proc. The Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing- Between Sense and Sensibility. New York, NY, ACM Press (2005), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Baskerville, R. L. and Wood-Harper, A. T. A Critical Perpsective on Action Research as a Method for Information Systems Research. Journal of Information Technology, 11, (1996). 235--246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Beck, E. P for Political: Participation is Not Enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1 (2002), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Benston, M. Feminism and systems design: Questions of control. In Tomm, W. (Ed.). The effects of feminist approaches on research methodologies. University of Calgary, Calgary, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Benston, M. and Balka, E. Participatory Design by Non-Profit Groups. Canadian Woman Studies Journal/les cahiers de la femme 13, 2 (1993), 100--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Benston, M. and Balka, E. Participatory design by nonprofit groups. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 1990, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, (1990), 107--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Beyer, H. and Holzblatt, K. Contextual Design. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 32--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Blythin, S., Hughes, J. and Rouncefield, M. 'Never mind all that ethno stuff: what does it mean and what do we do now?' Ethnography in a Commercial Context. Interactions 4, 3 (1997), 38--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Boulus, N. Making things work: On being an academic researcher working with a community partner. Paper presented at the Urban Health Conference: Achieving Social Justice in Urban Communities, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bowker, G. and Star, S. L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Braverman, H. Labor and monopoly capital. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Clement, A. Computing at Work: Empowering Action by 'Low-level Users'. Communications of the ACM, Special Issue on 'Social Computing' 37, 1 (1994), 52--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Damodaran, L. User involvement in the systems design process- A practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology 15, 6 (1996), 363--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ehn, P. and Kyng (M). The collective resource approach to systems design. In Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, 17--57. Aldershot, UK: Avebury; Brookfield, VT: Gower., 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Floyd, C. Being critical in, on or around computing? Proc. Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing-Between Sense and Sensibility (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Gärtner J. and Wagner I. Mapping actors and agendas: Political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human-Computer Interaction 11, (1996), 187--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Greenbaum, J. PD: A Personal Statement. In Communications of the Association of Computing Machinists (CACM), Special Issue on Participatory Design, 36, 4 (1993), 47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Greenwood, D. J. and Levin, M. Introduction to action research: Social research for social change. Newbury Park, CA, Sage 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen, C. B. Sorting Attachments: On Intervention and Usefulness in STS and Health Policy. Practices of Assessment and Intervention in Action-Oriented STS Research, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Karasti, H. Increasing sensitivity towards everyday work practice in system design (Academic Dissertation), 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7, 3--4 (1998), 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kensing, F. Participatory Design in a Commercial Context --- a conceptual framework. In Proc. Participatory Design Conference 2000, CPSR, Palo Alto, CA, (2000) 116--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kensing, F., Simonsen, J. and Bødker, K. Participatory Design at a Radio Station. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7 3--4 (1998), 243--271. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Messing, K., Seifert, A. M., Vézina, N., Balka, E., Chatigny, C. Qualitative research using numbers: Analysis developed in France and used to transform work in North America. New Solutions: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy 15(3): (2005), 245--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Noble, D. F. Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools. In A. Zimbalist (Ed.). Case studies on the labour process. New York, Monthly Review Press, 1979, 18--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Robertson, T. Shoppers and Tailors: Participative Practices in Small Australian Design Companies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7 3--4 (1998), 205--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Shapiro, D. Participatory design: The will to succeed. In. Bertelsen, O. W., Bouvin, N. O., Krough, P. G. and Kyng, M. (Eds.). Proc. Forth Decennial Aarhus Conference, Critical Computing- Between Sense and Sensibility. New York, NY, ACM Press (2005), 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. Computerization and Women's Knowledge (with Jordan, B.) In K. Tijdens, Jennings, M., Wagner, I. and Weggelaar, M. (Eds.) Women, Work and Computerization: Forming New Alliances. Amsterdam, North Holland, (1988), 153--160.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Vancouver Coastal Health. Briefing note: Patient Care Information System (PCIS) Enhancement Project. April 7, (2005), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Vancouver Coastal Health, Building the foundation for electronic health records: Recording accurate patient identity data is the key. In Medlink: The VCH physician newsletter September, (2005), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood Harper, A. T., Corder, S., Wood, J. R. G., and Watson, H. How We Profess: The Ethical Systems Analyst. Communications of the Association of Computing Machinists (CACM), 39, 3 (1996), 69--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1
            August 2006
            149 pages
            ISBN:159593460X
            DOI:10.1145/1147261

            Copyright © 2006 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 August 2006

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader