skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518963acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Knocking on elders' door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The domestic environment is more than a place where to live. It is a territory of meaning, a place where pleasure, affect and aesthetics are deeply interwoven with the functional and utilitarian dimensions. With the aging process, the home is progressively invested with new meanings and functions, and becomes the emotional center of older people's life.

This paper presents a user study based on cultural probes on how domestic spaces are managed and perceived by older adults, uncovering some of the complex interrelations among the daily activities, objects and meanings revolving around the home. The findings provide suggestions on how the dimensions of remembrance, perception of safety and environmental stability may affect the design of domestic technology for elderly people.

References

  1. Abowd, G. D., Atkeson C., Bobick A., Essa I., MacIntyre B., Mynatt E., Starner T. Living laboratories: The future computing environments group at the Georgia institute of technology. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alwan, M. Leachtenauer, J. Dalal, S. Mack, D. Kell, Turner, S., B. Felder, R. Psychosocial Impact of Monitoring Technology in Assisted Living: A Pilot Study. Information and Communication Technologies ICTTA'06, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aipperspach, R., Hooker, B., and Woodruff, A. FEATURE The heterogeneous home. Interactions 16, 1 (Jan. 2009), 35--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bell, G., Blythe, M., Gaver, B., Sengers, P., Wright, P. Designing culturally situated technologies for the home, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blythe M., Monk, A. Notes towards ethnography of domestic technology. Proc. Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., Dourish, P. How HCI Interprets the Probes. Proc. CHI'07, ACM Press (2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Csikszentmihalyi M., Rochberg-Halton E. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, 1981Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ciolfi, L., Bartolucci, I., Murphy, D. Meaningful Interactions for Meaningful Places: Investigating the Relationships between Nomadic Work, Tangible Artefacts and the Physical environment. Proc. EACE'05, Conference on European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Crabtree, A., Hemmings, T., Rodden, T., Cheverst, K., Clarke, K., Dewsbury, G., Hughes, J., Rouncefield, M. (2006) Designing with Care: Adapting Cultural Probes to Inform Design in sensitive Settings. Proc. OZCHI2004 (2004) Brisbane: Ergonomics Society of Australia, 4--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daley, B.J. Using Concept Maps in Qualitative Research. Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Concept Mapping. Eds. Pamplona, Spain 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M., Marek, K., Tyrer, H, Skubic, M., Hassam, A. Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of 'smart home' technologies. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine (2004), 29(2): 87--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Eisma, R., Tiwari, L., Mival, O. and Newell A. Domesticating Technology: In-home requirements gathering with frail older people. Proc. of 10th International Conference on Human - Computer Interaction HCI (2003), 827--831Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L. and Newell, A.F. Early user involvement in the development of information technology related products for older people. International Journal Universal Access in the Information Society, 3(2), 2004, 131--140 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Emiliani, P.L., Stephanidis, C. Universal access to ambient intelligence environments: Opportunities and challenges for people with disabilities. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Forlizzi J., DiSalvo C., Gemperle, F. Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes, Human-Computer Interaction, 2004. 19(1):25--59 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gaver W., Hooker B. The Presence Project. CRD Publishing. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaver, W.W., Boucher, A., Pennington, S., Walker, B. Cultural Probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions, Vol. 11, 5, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Giuliani, M.V., Scopelliti, M., Fornara, F. Elderly people at home: technological help in everyday activities. Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. Roman, 2005. Volume, Issue, 13-15 Aug. 2005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hindus D. The Importance of Homes in Technology Research. In N. Streitz, J. Siegel, V. Hartkopf, S. Konomi (Eds.), Cooperative Buildings - Integrating Information, Organizations, and Architecture. Proceedings of the. Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings (CoBuild'99), Pittsburgh, U.S.A., October 1-2, 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1670. Springer: Heidelberg. pp.199--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harrison, S. and Dourish, P. 1996. Re-Placeing Space: The Roles of Space and Place in Collaborative Systems. Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work CSCW'96 (Boston, MA), 67--76. New York: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hirsch, T., Forlizzi, J., Hyder, E., Goetz, J., Kurtz, C., and Stroback, J. 2000. The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability. Arlington, Virginia, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Imrie, R. Disability, Embodiment and the Meaning of the Home. Housing Studies, Vol. 19, No. 5 (2005) 745--763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jette, A.M. Disability trend and transactions. In Binstock R.H., George L.K., (eds.), Handbook of ageing and social science, 94 -- 116 (1996) San Diego, Academia Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamptner. N. A. Personal Possessions and Their Meaning in Old Age. The Social Psychology of Aging, Spacapan S., Oskamp S. (eds.). SAGE Publication, 1989Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwasny, M., Caine, K., Rogers, W.A., Fisk A. Privacy and technology: folk definitions and perspectives. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008. ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Leonardi C., Mennecozzi C., Not E., Pianesi F., and Zancanaro M. Getting Older People Involved in the Process of Ambient Assisted Living Research and Development. In Proceedings of the International Symposium of Gerontechnology ISG08. Siena, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. McCreadie, C., Tinker, A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing&Society 25, 2005, 91--110Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mynatt, E.D., Essa, I., Rogers, W. Increasing the Opportunities for Aging in Place. Proc. CUU'00, Arlington, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., Hughes J. At Home with Technology: An Ethnographic Study of a Set-Top-Box Trial. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 6, N. 3, Sept. 1999, pp. 282--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Osvald, F., Wahl, H.-W. Dimensions of the Meaning of Home in Later Life. In G.D. Rowles&H. Chaudhry (Eds.), Home and Identity in Later Life: International Perspectives (pp. 21--45). New York: Springer (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodden, T., Benford, S. The Evolution of Buildings for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. Proc. CHI '03. ACM Press (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Rowles, G., Chaudhury, H. (eds.) Home and Identity in late Life. NY, Springer Publishing Company (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Swan, L., Taylor A.S. Notes on Fridge Surfaces. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005. ACM Press (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Vetere, F., Gibbs, M.r. Kjeldskov, J. Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K., Bunyan, M. Mediating intimacy: designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. Proc. CHI 2005. ACM Press 2005 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Knocking on elders' door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader