skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518962acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper offers an exploration of the attitudes of older adults to keeping in touch with people who are important to them. We present findings from three focus groups with people from 55 to 81 years of age. Themes emerging from the findings suggest that older adults view the act of keeping in touch as being worthy of time and dedication, but also as being something that needs to be carefully managed within the context of daily life. Communication is seen as a means through which skill should be demonstrated and personality expressed, and is understood in a very different context to the lightweight interaction that is increasingly afforded by new technologies. The themes that emerged are used to elicit a number of design implications and to promote some illustrative design concepts for new communication devices.

References

  1. Aoki, P.M. and Woodruff, A. Making space for stories: Ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 181--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Auger, J., Loizeau, J. and Agamanolis, S. Iso-phone: A total submersion telephonic experience. In Proc. ISICT 2003, ACM Press (2003), 232--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, B., Taylor, A., Izadi, S., Sellen, A. and Kaye, J. Locating family values: A field trial of the Whereabouts Clock. In Proc. UbiComp 2007, ACM Press (2007), 354--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carstensen, L.L., Fung, H.H. and Charles, S.T. Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion 27, 2 (2003), 103--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chung, H., Lee, C.J., and Selker, T. Lover's Cups: Drinking interfaces as new communication channels. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 375--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Davis, H., Skov, M.B., Stougaard, M. and Vetere, F. Virtual Box: Supporting mediated family intimacy through virtual and physical play. In Proc. OzCHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 151--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Davis, H., Vetere, F., Francis, P., Gibbs, M. and Howard, S. I wish we could get together": Exploring intergenerational play across a distance via a 'Magic Box'. Journal of International Relationships 6, 2 (2008), 191--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dickinson, A. and Hill, R.L. Keeping in touch: Talking to older people about computers and communication. Educational Gerontology 33, (2007), 613--630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dickinson, A., Newell, A.F., Smith, M.J. and Hill, R.L. Introducing the Internet to the over-60s: Developing an email system for older novice computer users. Interacting with Computers 17, 6 (2005), 1--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dodge, C. The Bed: A medium for intimate communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 371--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Evjemo, B., Svendsen, G.B., Rinde, E. and Johnsen, J.K. Supporting the distributed family: The need for a conversational context. In Proc. NordiCHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 309--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, B. Provocative awareness. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 11, 3-4 (2002), 475--493. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gaver, W. and Dunne, A. Projected realities: Conceptual design for cultural effect. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 600--607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Grivas, K. Digital selves: Devices for intimate communications between homes. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, (2006), 66--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harper, R. Texture: Human Expression in the Age of Communications Overload. MIT Press, London, UK, in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S.D., Leduc, N., Hagström, A.E. and Bayley, O. Casablanca: Designing social communication devices for the home. In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 325--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kaye, J. I just clicked to say I love you: Rich evaluations of minimal communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 363--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Keyani, P., Hsieh, G., Mutlu, B., Easterday, M. and Forlizzi, J. DanceAlong: Supporting positive social exchange and exercise for the elderly through dance. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 1541--1544. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. King, S. and Forlizzi, J. Slow messaging: Intimate communications for couples living at a distance. In Proc. DPPI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 451--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lindley, S.E., Harper, R. and Sellen, A. Designing for elders: Exploring the complexity of relationships in later life. In Proc. HCI 2008, BCS (2008), 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Miyajima, A., Itoh, Y., Itoh, M. and Watanabe, T. "Tsunagari-kan communication: Design of a new telecommunication environment and a field test with family members living apart. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 19, 2 (2005), 253--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Morris, M.E. Social networks as health feedback displays. IEEE Internet Computing 9, 2 (2005) 253--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Neustaedter, C., Elliot, K. and Greenberg, S. Interpersonal awareness in the domestic realm. In Proc. OzCHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 15--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Plaisant, C., Clamage, A., Browne Hutchinson, H. Bederson, B.B. and Druin, A. Shared family calendars: Promoting symmetry and accessibility. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13, 3 (2006), 313--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., van Baren, J., de Ruyter, B., IJsselsteijn, W. and Farshchian, B. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, (2007), 299--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Saslis-Lagoudakis, G., Cheverst, K., Dix, A., Fitton, D. and Rouncefield, M. Hermes@Home: Supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members. In Proc. OzCHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sellen, A., Harper, R., Eardley, R., Izadi, S., Regan, T., Taylor, A.S., Wood, K.R. HomeNote: Supporting situated messaging in the home. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM Press (2006), 383--392. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Siio, I., Rowan, J. and Mynatt, E. Peek-A-Drawer: Communication by furniture. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 582--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Strauss, A.C. and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London, UK, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Tollmar, K. and Persson, J. Understanding remote presence. In Proc. NordiCHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 41--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Truong, K.N., Richter, H., Hayes, G.R. and Abowd, G.D. Devices for sharing thoughts and affection at a distance. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1203--1206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Turner, P., Turner, S. and van de Walle, G. How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 26, 4 (2007), 287--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vetere, F. Gibbs, M.R., Kjeldskov, J., Howard, S., Mueller, F., Pedell, S., Mecoles, K. and Bunyan, M. Mediating intimacy: Designing technologies to support strong-tie relationships. In Proc. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 471--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Wiley, J. Sung, J. and Abowd, G. The Message Center: Enhancing elder communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1523--1528. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader