skip to main content
10.1145/355460.355476acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuuConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies

Published:01 November 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ELDeR (Enhanced Living through Design Research) Project, comprised of a team of designers and behavioral scientists, conducted a four-month study at a seniors community near Pittsburgh, PA. The purpose of the project was to understand the experiences of elders and their caregivers in order to: 1) study the eldercare experience from the perspective of primary stakeholders; 2) to assess the importance of psychological and social factors in the eldercare experience; and 3) to identify implications for product, interface, and interaction design and opportunities for new products and technologies. Our findings show that social, emotional, and environmental factors play a key role in the eldercare experience and the adoption and use of new products. We argue that designing eldercare technologies to address all of these factors lowers social and economic barriers to universal usability.

References

  1. 1.Billipp, Susan Heyn. (1993). Computer network systems: a prosthetic tool to assist the vulnerable elderly in maintaining their independence. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health. (dissertation).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Button, G. (2000). The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies, 21 (4), pp.319-332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.Communication technologies for the elderly: vision, hearing, and speech. (1997). San Diego: Singular Pub. Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Czikszentmihaly, M., and Rochberg-Halton, M. (1981). The Meaning of Things. Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Engelhardt, K. G.; Goughler, Donald H. (1997). Robotic technologies and the older adult. In Fisk, Arthur D., Rogers, Wendy A., et al (Eds.). Handbook of human factors and the older adult. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Gaver, W., and Dunne, A. (1999). Projected realities: conceptual design for cultural effect. ACM SIGCH11999 Proceedings, pp. 600-607. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Golant, S.M. (1984). A Place to Grow Old: The Meaning of Environment in Old Age. NY: Columbia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Lacey, G. (1995). Personal adaptive mobility aid for the infirm and elderly :PAM-AID. SERIES: External technical reports, 95-18. Dublin: Trinity College, Department of Computer Science. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Laurel, B. (1991). Computers as Theater. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Lawton, M.P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In M.P. Lawton, P.G. Windley, and T.O. Byerts (eds), Aging and the Environment: Theoretical Approaches. NY: Springer Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Makela, A., Battarbee, K. Applying Usability Methods to Concept Development of a Future Wireless Communication Device -- Case in Maypole. www.uiah.fi/projects/smart/edesignGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Mueller, J. (Fall 1995). Designing for Real People, Design Management Journal, pp.40-44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. 14.Mulliek, A. & Steinfeld, E. (1997) Universal Design -What it is and isn t. Innovation, pp.14-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Norman, D. (1988). The Psychology of Everyday Things. NY: Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Personal Robotic Assistants For The Elderly (Nursebot), Carnegie Mellon University. www.ri.cs.cmu.edu/projects/project_34 7.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Pirkl, J. and Pulos, A. (1997). Transgenerational Design: Products for an Aging Population. NY: James Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Robot Will Assist the Elderly and Infirmed. (1997) Innovation, 5 (4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Salvador, T., Bell, G., Anderson, K. (1999) Design Ethnography. Design Management Journal, pp. 35-41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. 20.Shneiderman, B. (2000) Universal Usability. Communications of the ACM, 43 (5), pp.85-91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.Silverman, P. (1987). Community settings. In P. Silverman (Ed.), The Elderly as Modern Pioneers, pp.234- 262. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Sussman, Diane. (February 28, 2000). Robo-care: The Jetsons meets Florence Nightingale. Nurseweek/Healthweek.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Traetinski, N. (1997) Aesthetics and Apparent Usability: Empirically Assessing Cultural and Methodological Issues. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 115-122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24.Ward, R.A., La Gory, M., Sherman, S.R. (1988). The Environment for Aging. Tusealoosa: University of Alabama Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CUU '00: Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability
            November 2000
            165 pages
            ISBN:1581133146
            DOI:10.1145/355460

            Copyright © 2000 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 November 2000

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader