Ann Light
ABSTRACT
Traditional PD research offers a range of methods for participant engagement. Yet little is shared of the microdynamics of participation at its most intense, when the designer as facilitator is challenged by a range of social contingencies. Engaging people in change can be a messy process, especially when emotions run high. This paper explores two situations where communities were asked to collaborate on disaster mitigation plans and looks at how facilitation took place to engage with these concerns. It considers the relationship between method and its enactment, between the participatory practitioner and participant group, and between intention and outcome. In doing so, it questions the prevalent research culture that anonymises facilitation and its agency. Instead, we offer a more synthesised reading of practice, by focusing on aspects that compound the designers' task, such as the dynamics of the group and emotions manifested by participants. We argue that we need to orientate towards understanding the designers' participatory practice, rather than reporting participatory methods alone. The act of engaging others involves an embodied knowing, with moment-by-moment shifts in position, focus and delivery. Acknowledging this involves a rethink of our frameworks for reflecting and reporting on design.
- Agid, S. 'How can we design something to transition people from a system that doesn't want to let them go?'. Design Philosophy Papers, 2011, (3): 1--11.Google Scholar
- Akama, Y. 'Show and Tell: Accessing and Communicating Implicit Knowledge through Artefacts'. Artifact, 2007, 1(3): 172--81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akama, Y. Politics makes strange bedfellows: addressing the 'messy' power dynamics in design practice. in Proc. Design Research Society. 2008.Google Scholar
- Akama, Y. Warts-and-All: The Real Practice of Service Design. in Proc. Nordic Conference on Service Design and Service Innovation, 2009, 1--11.Google Scholar
- Akama, Y, and Ivanka, T. What Community? Facilitating Awareness of 'Community' through Playful Triggers. in Proc. PDC 2010, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Akama, Y and Light A. A Candor in Reporting: Designing Dexterously for Fire Preparedness, in Proc. CHI 2012, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Binder, T., Ehn, P., De Michelis, M., Jacucci, G. Linde, P. and Wagner, I. Design Things, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 2011Google Scholar
- Dearden A. M. and Wright P. C. Experiences using situated and non-situated techniques for studying work in context. in Proc. INTERACT 1997, 429--436. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DePaula, R. Lost in translation: a critical analysis of actors, artifacts, agendas, and arenas in participatory design, in Proc. PDC 2004, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dorst, K. Understanding Design, BIS, Netherlands, 2003.Google Scholar
- Ehn, P. & Sjöögren, D. From Systems Description to Scripts for Action, in Design at Work, eds. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. LEA, Mahwah, NJ. 1991Google Scholar
- Funnell, A. Emergencies, Disasters and the Role of Digital Technology: ABC Radio National, 2011, (accessed 31st May 2012 from) http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/futuretense/emergencies-disasters-and-the-role-of-digital/3652170Google Scholar
- Gaver, W. W., Dunne, A., and Pacenti. E. Cultural Probes. Interactions, 1999, 6(1): 21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Goodman, H., Stevens, K., and Rowe, C. Mt Bold Case Study in Report for the Country Fire Service Community Education Unit, Bushfire CRC/RMIT University, 2009.Google Scholar
- Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns, JCSCW 7, 167--185, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kimbell, L. Designing for Services as One Way of Designing Services. Int. J. Design 2001, 5(2):1--12.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Law, J. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London: Routledge. 2004.Google Scholar
- Light, A. The Unit of Analysis in Understanding the Politics of Participatory Practice. in Proc. PDC 2010, 183--186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Light, A., Egglestone, P., Wakeford, T. & Rogers, J. Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research, JoCI 2011, 7:3.Google Scholar
- Light, A. and Miskelly, C. Brokering between Heads and Hearts: an analysis of designing for social change. in Proc. Design Research Society, 2008.Google Scholar
- Loi, D. The Book of Probes. Lavoretti Per Bimbi: Playful Triggers as Key to Foster Collaborative Practices and Workspaces Where People Learn, Wonder and Play. PhD Thesis, RMIT University, Melbourne, 2005.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. J. Participatory Design: the third space in HCI, in J. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.): The Human-computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1051--1068, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1962.Google Scholar
- Robertson, T., Mansfield, T. and Loke, L. 2006. Designing an immersive environment for public use. In Proc. PDC'06, 2006, 31--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanders, E. B. Scaffolds for Experiencing in the New Design Space. Information Design Institute for Information Design Japan. 2002, 1--6.Google Scholar
- Sanders, E. B., Brandt, E. & Binder, T. A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design, in Proc PDC 2010, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
- Shklovski, I., Palen, L., & Sutton, J. Finding Community through Information and Communication Technology During Disaster Events. in Proc CSCW 2008, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sibbet, D. Principles of Facilitation: The Purpose and Potential of Leading Group Process, The Grove Consultants, CA, 2002.Google Scholar
- Starbird, K. and Palen, L. "Voluntweeters": self-organizing by digital volunteers in times of crisis. in Proc. CHI 2011. 2011, 1071--1080. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strickdorn, M. and Schneider, J. This Is Service Design Thinking. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge, CUP, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian J. of IS, 2002, 12(2):91--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. Practice-based Design: Some Object Lessons, in Proc. OOPSLA 2008, 2008 Google Scholar
- Weaver, R. G. and Farrell, J. D. Managers as Facilitators: a practical guide to getting work done in a changing workplace, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
- Willis, A. Ontological Designing, Design Philosophy Papers, 2006. (2):1--11.Google Scholar
- Woolrych, A., Hornbæk, K., Frøkjær, E. & Cockton, G. Ingredients and Meals Rather Than Recipes: A Proposal for Research That Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes, Int J. HCI, 2011, 27(10): 940--9.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Towards Participatory Design Facilitation as Reflective Practice
NordiCHI '22: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction ConferenceFacilitators of participatory design activities have a large impact on the form of participation and the output of such activities. Yet, the facilitator role and role-related practices have not yet been thoroughly problematized in human–computer ...
Affordances for practice
This paper argues that Gibson's concept of affordance inserts a powerful conceptual lens for the study of sociomateriality as enacted in contemporary organizational practices. Our objective in this paper is to develop a comprehensive view of affordances ...
'I'm a rambler, I'm a gambler, I'm a long way from home': The Place of Props, Music, and Design in Dementia Care
DIS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive SystemsThis paper presents an ethnographic study exploring the role of props and music in dementia care in order to engage participants and inform design. Our findings extend current understandings of participation to reveal that a more nuanced view of ...
Comments