skip to main content
10.1145/1900441.1900444acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What community?: facilitating awareness of 'community' through playful triggers

Published:29 November 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Notions of 'community' are still taken-for-granted in Participatory Design discourse, omitting critical examination of how people participate in projects to achieve and evaluate community-based participation and outcomes. This paper critically reflects on challenges and obstacles faced when using participatory design methods in engaging a 'community' on bushfire risk awareness. Bushfires are a critical and continuous threat to residents living in regional areas of Australia. Through this project, we identified a critical communication problem in bushfire awareness and preparation caused by 'fragmented' networks among a 'community of place'. This fragmentation contributes to significant communication obstacles in community-level preparation for bushfires. This research explored participatory design 'scaffolds' to capture, share and visualise locally relevant knowledge vital in mitigating bushfire risks. These methods facilitated awareness and revealed tacit knowledge on who and what community is. Critical reflection of the project examines how such methods have the potential to facilitate the creation of sub-groups gathered around a common cause. And has also built understanding to avoid 'imagined' notions of a community that can hide social heterogeneity.

References

  1. Akama, Y., Cooper, R., Vaughan, L., Viller, S., Simpson, M. & Yuille, J. Show and tell: Accessing and communication implicit knowledge through artefacts, Artifact Journal, 2007, 1(3):172--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arias, E., & Fischer, M. Boundary Objects: Their Role in Articulating the Task at Hand and Making Information Relevant to It. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Interactive & Collaborative Computing, University of Wollongong. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Balka, E. Inside the belly of the beast: the challenges and successes of a reformist participatory agenda. Paper presented at the Participatory Design Conference 2006, Trento, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (eds.). Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. I. B. Tauris & Co., New York. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, E. P for political: participation is not enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2002, 13(1): 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Balcombe, L., Cottrell, A., & Newton, J. 'Awareness of bushfire risk - Tamborine mountain case study', Fire Note, Bushfire CRC, 20. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenkert-Smith, H., Building bridges to fight fire: the role of informal social interactions in six Colorado wildland-urban interface communities, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2010, 19:689--697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Carey, J. Communication as culture: essays on media and society. Routledge, London. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, A. P. The symbolic construction of community, Routledge, London. 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Delanty, G. Community. Routledge, London. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Freire, P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. The Continuum International Publishing Group, New York. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaver, B., Dunne, A., & Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. Interactions, 1999, 6(1):21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gilbert, J. An evaluation of the Street FireWise Community Education Program in the Blue Mountains, New South Wales, Bushfire CRC, 1--3. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilbert, J., & Marsh, G. Final report: BRAG (Bushfire Ready Action Group) in Western Australia: Three evaluative case studies: Bushfire CRC / RMIT University. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown and Company, Boston. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, D. Black Saturday cost $4.4 billion. The Age (1st August 2010). Accesssed on 24 September 2010 from http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/black-saturday-cost-44-billion-20100801-11116.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, H., Stevens, K., and Rowe, C. Mt Bold Case Study: Bushfire CRC / RMIT University. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Holton, D., & Clarke, D. Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2006, 37:127--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Loi, D. The Book of Probes. Lavoretti Per Bimbi: Playful Triggers as key to foster collaborative practices and workspaces where people learn, wonder and play. RMIT University, Melbourne. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Magsino, S. L. Applications of Social Network Analysis for Building Community Disaster Resilience: Workshop Summary. The National Academic Press, Washington, DC. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Platt, D. Planning for growth, climate change & water shortages: Resilient Futures Network. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Pelling, M. Learning from others: the scope and challenges for participatory disaster risk assessment. Disasters, 2007, 31(4):373--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rhodes, A., & Goodman, H. Where there's smoke there's fire - isn't there? Understanding community response to the threat of the Eyre Peninsula bushfire, Bushfire CRC. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, L. Education for resilience: Community safety communication for natural hazards. 2003. Accessed on 8th August 2009 from http://www.enablingchange.com.au/Resilience_and_risk.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanders, E. B. Scaffolds for Experiencing in the New Design Space. Information Design. Graphic-sha Publishing, Institute for Information Design Japan. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Shapiro, D. Participatory Design: the will to succeed. ACM, 2005, 29--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Teague, B., McLeod, R., & Pascoe, S. 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission Interim Report (Chapter 1). Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Teague, B., McLeod, R., & Pascoe, S. 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission Final Report Summary. Parliament of Victoria, Melbourne. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Twigg, J. Disaster Risk Reduction: Mitigation and Preparedness in Development and Emergency Planning. A Good Practice Review commissioned by the Humanitarian Practice Network at ODI, London. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. S. In: Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner S. and Souberman, E. (eds) Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976, 17:89--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PDC '10: Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
    November 2010
    314 pages
    ISBN:9781450301312
    DOI:10.1145/1900441

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 November 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader