skip to main content
10.1145/2212776.2212806acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A candor in reporting: designing dexterously for fire preparedness

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper challenges the domination of repeatable methods in HCI discourse and, instead, offers a design case study that details ad-hoc, contextually-driven decisions as to how processes can unfold in a community-based project, taking on fire awareness in Australia. The paper draws out details which enable us to understand why and how methods were modified or abandoned to overcome obstacles, and what was made a priority in arriving at greater understanding of communicating risk. This reporting differs from an established research accounting, but offers complexity and richness in human-centered research as we seek to develop our epistemologies of design research practice.

References

  1. Allen, C. The Fallacy of "Housing Studies": Philosophical Problems of Knowledge and Understanding in Housing Research, Housing. Theory and Society, 26(1), 2009, 53--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenkert-Smith, H. Building bridges to fight fire: the role of informal social interactions in six Colorado wildland-urban interface communities, Int. J. of Wildland Fire 19, 2010, 689--697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bruner, J. Acts of Meaning, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, R. 'Design Research and the New Learning', Design Issues, 17(4), 2001. 3--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Buchanan, R. 'Wicked problems in design thinking'. Design Issues, 8(2), 1992. 5--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daws, K.K. Cautionary Advice from a Usability Zealot, User Experience Magazine, UPA, Summer 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards. W.K., Newman, M.W. and Poole, E.S. The Infrastructure Problem in HCI CHI'10. 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaver, W. W., Bowers, J., Kerridge, T., Boucher, A., and Jarvis, N., Anatomy of a Failure: how we knew our design went wrong, and what we learned from it. CHI'09. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gladwell, M. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodman, E., Stolterman, E., and Wakkary, R. Understanding Interaction Design Practices. CHI'10. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Haseman, B., and Mafe, D. Acquiring Know-How: Research Training for Practice-led Researchers in Dean, R. T., Smith, H (eds.), Practice-led Research, Researchled Practice in the Creative Arts, Edinburgh University Press, 2009. 211--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, C. J. Design methods (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Law, J. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research, London: Routledge. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lavie, T. and Tractinsky, N. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of websites, Human Computer Studies, 60. 2004. 269--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Light, A. The Unit of Analysis in Understanding the Politics of Participatory Practice. PDC'10. 2010 183--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Light, A., Egglestone, P., Wakeford, T. and Rogers, J. (2011) Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research, JoCI 7:3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Magsino, S. L. Applications of Social Network Analysis for Building Community Disaster Resilience: Workshop Summary. Washington DC: The National Academic Press. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Oulasvirta, A. Why your paper was rejected, blog post accessed 16th December 2010 from http://oulasvirta.posterous.com/86113982Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rowson, J., Broome, S., and Jones, A. Connected Communities: How social networks power and sustain the Big Society, RSA, London. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Schein, E.H. Models and tools for stability and change in human systems. Reflections, 4(2) 2002, 34-Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Schön, D. The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Williams, A. and Irani, L. There's Methodology in the Madness: Toward Critical HCI Ethnography, CHI'10 Extended Abstracts (alt.chi). 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A candor in reporting: designing dexterously for fire preparedness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '12: CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      2864 pages
      ISBN:9781450310161
      DOI:10.1145/2212776

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader