skip to main content
10.1145/2347635.2347643acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper explores the issue of empowering participants in design when they do not have the language skills integral to many design methods. We describe the challenges, solutions reached and lessons learned whilst employing a participatory design (PD) approach in the development of a prototype computer therapy tool for people with aphasia, a communication disorder.

Our approach was workshop based. During a series of participatory workshop sessions, five people with aphasia, employed as consultants, took part in game-playing activities followed by hands-on interaction with a series of iterative prototypes. The challenges we faced arose primarily from the consultants' difficulties with the production and comprehension of language, both textual and verbal, and with the retention of information. The strategies and techniques we devised to cope with these challenges evolved over the course of the workshop sessions. We discuss these and how to involve and empower users with cognitive impairments, in the context of a broadening scope of PD practices.

References

  1. Allen, M., McGrenere, J., and Purves, B. The Design and Field Evaluation of PhotoTalk: a digital image communication application for people with aphasia. Proc. ACM ASSETS 2007. ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Al Mahmud, A. and Martens, J. B. Re-connect: designing accessible email communication support for persons with aphasia. Proc. CHI EA 2010, 3505--3510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Béguin, P. Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interacting with Computers, 2003, 15(5), 709--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bodker, S. and Pekkola, S. A Short Review to the Past and Present of Participatory Design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2010, 22(1):45--48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonita, R. and Beaglehole, R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke, 1988, 19:1497--1500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Boyd-Graber, J. L., Nikolova, S., Moffatt, K. A., Kin, K. C., Lee, J. Y., Mackey, L. W. Tremaine, M. M. and Klawe, M. M. Participatory design with proxies: developing a desktop-PDA system to support people with aphasia. Proc. CHI 2006, 151--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cappelletti, M., and Cipolotti L. The neuropsychological assessment and treatment of calculation disorders. In J. C. Marshall, and U. Kischka (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology (2nd Ed). Oxford University Press, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Daeman, E., Dadlani, P., Du, J., Li, Y., Erik-Paker, P., Martens, J., and De Ruyter, B. Designing a free style, indirect, and interactive storytelling application for people with aphasia. Proc. INTERACT 2007, 221--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Franklin, S., Howard, D. and Patterson, K. Abstract word meaning deafness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1994, 11:1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Franklin, S., Howard, D. and Patterson, K. Abstract Word Anomia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1995, 12:549--566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gainotti, G. Assessment and treatment of emotional disorders. In P Halligan, Kischka U and J Marshall (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2003 Oxford University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Galliers, J., Wilson, S., Muscroft, S., Marshall, J., Roper, A., Cocks, N. and Pring, T. Accessibility of 3D Game Environments for People with Aphasia: An Exploratory Study. Proc. ACM ASSETS 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Goldenberg, G., Hartmann, K. and Schlott, I. Defective pantomime of object use in left brain damage: Apraxia or asymbolia? Neuropsychologia, 2003, 41:1565--1573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E. and Barresi, B. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams, & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodwin, C. Gesture, Aphasia and Interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.) Language and Gesture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris Wright, H., and Shisler, R. J. Working Memory in Aphasia: Theory, Measures, and Clinical Implications. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2005, 14:107--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Koppenol, T., Al Mahmud, A., and Martens J. B, When Words Fall Short: Helping People with Aphasia to Express. Proc. ICCHP 2010, Part II, 45--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marshall, J., Best, B., Cocks, N., Cruice, M., Pring, T., Bulcock, G., Greek, G., Eales, N., Lockhart Mummery, A., Matthews, N. and Caute, A. (in press) Gesture and Naming Therapy for People with Severe Aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, N. Disorders of word production. In I. Papathanasiou, P. Coppens and C. Potagas (eds) Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Jones and Bartlett Learning, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J. Purves, B. and Klawe, M. The Participatory Design of a Sound and Image Enhanced Daily Planner for People with Aphasia, Proc. CHI 2004, 407--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Muller, M., Millen, D. and Strohecker, C. What makes a representative user representative? Considering Synecdochic and Metonymic Fallacies. Proc. CHI 2001, Extended Abstracts, 101--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Murray, L. Attention deficits in aphasia: presence, nature, assessment, and treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 2002, 23(2):107--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Murray, L. Attention and aphasia: Theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 1999, 13:91--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Purdy, M. Executive function ability in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 2002, 16(4-6): 549--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Robson, J., Marshall, J., Pring, T., Montagu, A. and Chiat, S. Processing Proper Nouns in Aphasia: Evidence from Assessment and Therapy. Aphasiology, 2004, 18:917--935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Rose, M. The utility of gesture treatments in aphasia. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 2006, 8(2): 92--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Rosenbek, J. C., LaPoint, L. L. and Wertz, R. T. Aphasia: A Clinical Approach. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Saetti, M., Marangolo, P., De Renzi, E., Rinaldi, M. and Lattanzi, E. The nature of the disorder underlying the inability to retrieve proper names. Cortex, 1999, 35:675--685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sterzi, R., Bottini, G., Celani, M. G., Righetti, E., Lamassa, M., Ricci, S. and Vallar G. Hemianopia, hemianaesthesia, and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemispheric difference. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1993, 56:308--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E. and Jennings, F. Abstract word deficits in aphasia: Evidence from semantic priming. Neuropsychology, 1995, 9(3):354--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Varley, R., Siegal, M., and Want, S. Severe impairment in grammar does not preclude theory of mind. Neurocase, 2001, 7: 489--493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Winters, N., and Mor, Y. IDR: A participatory methodology for interdisciplinary design in technology enhanced learning. Computers and Education, 2008, 50(2): 579--600. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wu, M., Richard, B., and Baecker, R. Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia. Proc. PDC 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PDC '12: Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1
      August 2012
      147 pages
      ISBN:9781450308465
      DOI:10.1145/2347635

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 August 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader