Hadas Erel
Oren Zuckerman
ABSTRACT
Companion robots have been suggested as a promising technology for older adults who experience loneliness. However, healthy older adults commonly reject robots designed to be an ”artificial friend”. We follow the approach of ”companionship as a secondary function”, in which a non-humanoid robot is designed with a primary function that older adults perceive as appropriate, and a secondary function of companionship. In a Zoom-based exploratory need-study we unfold how older adults perceive the various aspects of a robot’s ”companionship” as a secondary function. Our qualitative analysis reveals several use cases that older adults find to be appropriate for their daily routine, and classify them into three high-level categories: companionship as ”attentive to me”, companionship as ”looking after me”, and companionship as ”experiencing together with me”. Our findings indicate that robot companionship, when designed as a secondary function, is perceived by older adults as a multifaceted social experience.
- Raihah Aminuddin, Amanda Sharkey, and Liat Levita. 2016. Interaction with the Paro robot may reduce psychophysiological stress responses. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 593–594.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Lucy Anderson-Bashan, Benny Megidish, Hadas Erel, Iddo Wald, Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, and Andrey Grishko. 2018. The greeting machine: an abstract robotic object for opening encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 595–602.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard E Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. sage.Google Scholar
- Mason Bretan and Gil Weinberg. 2014. Chronicles of a Robotic Musical Companion.. In NIME. 315–318.Google Scholar
- Joost Broekens, Marcel Heerink, Henk Rosendal, 2009. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology 8, 2 (2009), 94–103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kerstin Dautenhahn, Sarah Woods, Christina Kaouri, Michael L Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, and Iain Werry. 2005. What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler?. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, 1192–1197.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Inbal Deutsch, Hadas Erel, Michal Paz, Guy Hoffman, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Home robotic devices for older adults: Opportunities and concerns. Computers in Human Behavior 98 (2019), 122–133.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hadas Erel, Tzachi Shem Tov, Yoav Kessler, and Oren Zuckerman. 2019. Robots are Always Social: Robotic Movements are Automatically Interpreted as Social Cues. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neta Ezer, Arthur D Fisk, and Wendy A Rogers. 2009. Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. In International conference on universal access in human-computer interaction. Springer, 39–48.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susanne Frennert, Håkan Eftring, and Britt Östlund. 2013. What older people expect of robots: A mixed methods approach. In International conference on social robotics. Springer, 19–29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Gibbs. 2008. Analysing qualitative data (Qualitative research kit). Retrieved from (2008).Google Scholar
- Robert J Havighurst. 1963. Successful aging. Processes of aging: Social and psychological perspectives 1 (1963), 299–320.Google Scholar
- Tad Hirsch, Jodi Forlizzi, Elaine Hyder, Jennifer Goetz, Chris Kurtz, and Jacey Stroback. 2000. The ELDer project: social, emotional, and environmental factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In Proceedings on the 2000 conference on Universal Usability. 72–79.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chin-Chang Ho, Karl F MacDorman, and ZA Dwi Pramono. 2008. Human emotion and the uncanny valley: a GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings. In 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 169–176.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy Hoffman and Keinan Vanunu. 2013. Effects of robotic companionship on music enjoyment and agent perception. In 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, 317–324.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suzanne Hutson, Soo Ling Lim, Peter J Bentley, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Ann Bowling. 2011. Investigating the suitability of social robots for the wellbeing of the elderly. In International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Springer, 578–587.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nancy S Jecker. 2020. You’ve got a friend in me: sociable robots for older adults in an age of global pandemics. Ethics and Information Technology(2020), 1–9.Google Scholar
- Nina Jøranson, Ingeborg Pedersen, Anne Marie Mork Rokstad, and Camilla Ihlebaek. 2015. Effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in persons with dementia participating in robot-assisted activity: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16, 10(2015), 867–873.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wendy Ju and Leila Takayama. 2009. Approachability: How people interpret automatic door movement as gesture. International Journal of Design 3, 2 (2009).Google Scholar
- Reza Kachouie, Sima Sedighadeli, Rajiv Khosla, and Mei-Tai Chu. 2014. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 30, 5(2014), 369–393.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simone Kriglstein and Gunter Wallner. 2005. HOMIE: an artificial companion for elderly people. In CHI’05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2094–2098.Google Scholar
- Amanda Lazar, Hilaire J Thompson, Anne Marie Piper, and George Demiris. 2016. Rethinking the design of robotic pets for older adults. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1034–1046.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hee Rin Lee and Laurel D Riek. 2018. Reframing assistive robots to promote successful aging. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI) 7, 1 (2018), 1–23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tuck W Leong and Benjamin Johnston. 2016. Co-design and robots: a case study of a robot dog for aging people. In International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer, 702–711.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcus Mast, Michael Burmester, Eva Berner, David Facal, Lucia Pigini, and Lorenzo Blasi. 2010. Semi-autonomous teleoperated learning in-home service robots for elderly care: A qualitative study on needs and perceptions of elderly people, family caregivers, and professional caregivers. In 20th International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics, Varna, Bulgaria, October 1-6.Google Scholar
- Claudine McCreadie and Anthea Tinker. 2005. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Ageing & Society 25, 1 (2005), 91–110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michele J McIntosh and Janice M Morse. 2015. Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global qualitative nursing research 2 (2015), 2333393615597674.Google Scholar
- Tracy L Mitzner, Julie B Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D Fisk, Wendy A Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. Older adults talk technology: Technology usage and attitudes. Computers in human behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1710–1721.Google Scholar
- Austin Lee Nichols and Jon K Maner. 2008. The good-subject effect: Investigating participant demand characteristics. The Journal of general psychology 135, 2 (2008), 151–166.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raymond Opdenakker. 2006. Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/forum: Qualitative social research, Vol. 7.Google Scholar
- Lihui Pu, Wendy Moyle, Cindy Jones, and Michael Todorovic. 2019. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. The Gerontologist 59, 1 (2019), e37–e51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hayley Robinson, Bruce MacDonald, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2014. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: A review. International Journal of Social Robotics 6, 4 (2014), 575–591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John W Rowe and Robert L Kahn. 1987. Human aging: usual and successful. Science 237, 4811 (1987), 143–149.Google Scholar
- Selma Šabanović, Wan-Ling Chang, Casey C Bennett, Jennifer A Piatt, and David Hakken. 2015. A robot of my own: participatory design of socially assistive robots for independently living older adults diagnosed with depression. In International conference on human aspects of it for the aged population. Springer, 104–114.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cliodhna Ní Scanaill, Sheila Carew, Pierre Barralon, Norbert Noury, Declan Lyons, and Gerard M Lyons. 2006. A review of approaches to mobility telemonitoring of the elderly in their living environment. Annals of biomedical engineering 34, 4 (2006), 547–563.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leonhard Schilbach, Bert Timmermans, Vasudevi Reddy, Alan Costall, Gary Bente, Tobias Schlicht, and Kai Vogeley. 2013. Toward a second-person neuroscience 1. Behavioral and brain sciences 36, 4 (2013), 393–414.Google Scholar
- David Sirkin, Brian Mok, Stephen Yang, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Mechanical ottoman: how robotic furniture offers and withdraws support. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 11–18.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cory-Ann Smarr, Tracy L Mitzner, Jenay M Beer, Akanksha Prakash, Tiffany L Chen, Charles C Kemp, and Wendy A Rogers. 2014. Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. International journal of social robotics 6, 2 (2014), 229–247.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Walter Dan Stiehl, Cynthia Breazeal, Kuk-Hyun Han, Jeff Lieberman, Levi Lalla, Allan Maymin, Jonathan Salinas, Daniel Fuentes, Robert Toscano, Cheng Hau Tong, 2006. The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 emerging technologies. 15–es.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Toshiyo Tamura, Satomi Yonemitsu, Akiko Itoh, Daisuke Oikawa, Akiko Kawakami, Yuji Higashi, Toshiro Fujimooto, and Kazuki Nakajima. 2004. Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia?The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 59, 1 (2004), M83–M85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adriana Tapus, Mataric Maja, and Brian Scassellatti. 2007. The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. (2007).Google Scholar
- John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 429–438.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margaret Von Faber, Annetje Bootsma-van der Wiel, Eric van Exel, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Anne M Lagaay, Els van Dongen, Dick L Knook, Sjaak van der Geest, and Rudi GJ Westendorp. 2001. Successful aging in the oldest old: who can be characterized as successfully aged?Archives of internal medicine 161, 22 (2001), 2694–2700.Google Scholar
- Kazuyoshi Wada, Takanori Shibata, Tomoko Saito, Kayoko Sakamoto, and Kazuo Tanie. 2005. Psychological and social effects of one year robot assisted activity on elderly people at a health service facility for the aged. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2785–2790.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ya-Huei Wu, Christine Fassert, and Anne-Sophie Rigaud. 2012. Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics 54, 1 (2012), 121–126.Google Scholar
- Oren Zuckerman, Dina Walker, Andrey Grishko, Tal Moran, Chen Levy, Barak Lisak, Iddo Yehoshua Wald, and Hadas Erel. 2020. Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults’ Feelings of” Being-Seen”. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The Multifaceted Nature of Robotic Companionship when Presented as a Secondary Function
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Companionship Is Not a Function: The Effect of a Novel Robotic Object on Healthy Older Adults' Feelings of "Being-Seen"
CHI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOne of the challenges faced by healthy older adults is experiencing feelings of not "being-seen". Companion robots, commonly designed with zoomorphic or humanoid appearance show success among clinical older adults, but healthy older adults find them ...
Successful aging for low-income older adults: towards design principles
PervasiveHealth '16: Proceedings of the 10th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareLow-income older adults are at risk of poor health outcomes due to rising healthcare costs. When designed to reflect their needs, technologies can provide a cost-effective solution to this problem. We investigated the issues and strategies low-income ...
Successful Leisure in Independent Living Communities: Understanding Older Adults' Motivations to Engage in Leisure Activities
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsLeisure activities are a source of meaning and enjoyment for individuals across the lifespan. In this study, we conducted interviews with twenty-four older adults living in four different independent living communities. We present societal and ...
Comments