skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357336acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today the design of most healthcare technology is driven by the considerations of healthcare professionals and technology companies. This has several benefits, but we argue that there is a need for a supplementary design approach on the basis the citizen and his or her everyday life. An approach where the main focus is to develop healthcare technology that fits the routines of daily life and thus allows the citizens to continue with the activities they like and have grown used to -- also with an aging body or when managing a chronic condition. Thus, with this approach it is not just a matter of fixing a health condition, more importantly is the matter of sustaining everyday life as a whole. This argument is a result from our work -- using participatory design methods -- on the development of supportive healthcare technology for elderly people and for diabetic, pregnant women.

References

  1. Aaløkke, S, Corry, A, Kramp, G. Does it Work on Sundays too? Healthcare Technology for Elderly People, Third International Conference on Information Technology in Healthcare: Socio-technical approaches. Sydney, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaløkke, S, Bunde-Pedersen, J, Bardram, J. E. Where to Roberta? Reflecting on the Role of Technology in Assisted Living. Proceedings of NordiChi (2006), 373--376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, S., Hine, N., Sixsmith, A., Garner, P. Care in the community, BT Technology Journal, 22 (3), 56 -- 64, 2004 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Claxton, A.J., Cramer, J.A., Pierce, C. (2001). Medication compliance: the importance of the dosing regimen. Clinical Therapeutics, 23, 1296--1310.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Crabtree, A., Rodden, T. Domestic Routines and Design for the Home. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13 (2004), 191--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cramer, J.A., Medication use by the elderly: enhancing patient compliance in the elderly: role of packaging aids and monitoring, Drugs & Aging, 12 (1998), 7--15Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ehn, P. & Kyng, M., Cardboard Computers: Mocking-it-up or Hands-on the Future. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.). Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey (1991), 169--195 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Goffman, Erving, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Penguin: Harmondsworth (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greenbaum, J. Kyng, M. Situated Design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1991), 1--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hansen, T. R., Strings of experiments: looking at the design process as a set of socio--technical experiments. In Proceedings of the PDC Conference. PDC '06. ACM, New York, NY (2006),1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hirsch, T., Forlizzi, J., Hyder, E., Goetz, J., Stroback, J., Kurtz, C. The ELDer Project: Social, Emotional, and Environmental Factors in the Design of Eldercare Technologies. CUU'2000, (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kyng, M. Users and Computers: A contextual approach to the design of computer artifacts, SJIS 10,1-2 (1998), 7--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kyng, M., Nielsen, E. T., Kristensen M., Challenges in designing interactive systems for emergency response. In Proceedings of DIS'06, ACM, (2006), 301--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mamykina, L., Mynatt, E. D., and Kaufman, D. R., Investigating health management practices of individuals with diabetes. Proceedings of CHI, CHI '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, (2006), 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Morrow, D. G., Weiner, M, Young, J, Steinley, D, Deer, M, Murray, M. D., Improving Medication Knowledge Among Older Adults With Heart Failure: A Patient-Centered Approach to Instruction Design, Gerontologist, 45 (2005), 545--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Murphy, R. F., The Body Silent. W.W. Norton: New York, (1990).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Palen, L, Aaløkke, S. Of Pill Boxes and Piano Benches: "Home-made" Methods for Managing Medication. Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (2006), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rowan, J. & Mynatt, E. D. Digital Family Portrait Field Trial: Support for Aging in Place. Proceedings of CHI'05 (2005), 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Taylor, A.S., Swan, L. Artful Systems in the Home. Proceedings of CHI (2005), 641 -- 650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Web: Philips Motiva product (checked June 2007) http://www.medical.philips.com/main/products/telemonitoring/products/motiva/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Healthcare in everyday life: designing healthcare services for daily life

                  Recommendations

                  Reviews

                  Andrew Brooks

                  Information technology (IT) is revolutionizing healthcare, both in and out of hospitals. But do technological solutions proposed by healthcare professionals and IT companies meet the needs of nonhospitalized recipients who are trying to live normal lives__?__ The answer to this question is often negative. Ballegaard et al. recount their experiences with over 15 projects, ultimately focusing on two: one concerned with the elderly, and the other with diabetic, pregnant women. To support the development of usable healthcare technology, two design guidelines are suggested: "design for continuity" and "design for understandability and learning." The "design for continuity" guideline not only promotes solutions that minimize disruption to the routines of daily life, but also promotes solutions that are aesthetically pleasing. The "design for understandability and learning" guideline promotes solutions where functioning can be explained in different ways to different users, as well as solutions that allow the users to understand the correspondence between measurements and their own health status. The importance of participatory design in implementing these guidelines is stressed, with the daily life of the intended recipient as the starting point. Some of the examples recounted would shock even the most seasoned specialist: several elderly citizens could not tell when a mobile phone used for data transmission was disconnected; with the logical aim of minimizing infant mortality and birth defects, several diabetic, pregnant women were obligated to regularly attend a specialist clinic that was a two-hour drive away. Although success stories based on the use of the two guidelines are not presented, this paper provides many insights. I recommend it to those responsible for developing healthcare technology solutions. Online Computing Reviews Service

                  Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                  Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                    April 2008
                    1870 pages
                    ISBN:9781605580111
                    DOI:10.1145/1357054

                    Copyright © 2008 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 6 April 2008

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader