Netta Iivari
ABSTRACT
Critical design arouses increasing interest in Human Computer Interaction (HCI). Critical Design is a relatively novel and a contentious design approach within this stream, while also other critical design approaches are emerging in HCI. Information systems research, then again, has been fascinated with critical research for decades and strongly integrated the critical lens into studies on systems development and use. However, critical information systems research is weak in the design practice -- very few studies actually involve design. We argue that combining the forces of these various critical traditions, an empowering approach to design can be developed. A categorization of critical design approaches is proposed and fascinating paths for future work are identified. Particularly we call for future developments on critical design research along two lines: expert-led critical design better integrating the tenets of the critical research tradition and user-led critical design truly advocating the empowerment of the power-weak.
- Alvarez, R. (2002). Confessions of an information worker: a critical analysis of information requirements discourse. Information and Organization, 12(2), 85107.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London, Sage.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Auger, J. (2013) Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24(1), 11--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bardzell, J. (2007). Creativity in amateur multimedia: Popular culture, critical theory, and HCI. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 3(1), 12--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3297--3306). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. (2012). Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 288--297). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Koefoed Hansen, L. (2015). Immodest proposals: Research through design and knowledge. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2093--2102). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Stolterman, E. (2014). Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1951--1960). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beck, E. E. (2002). P for political: Participation is not enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14(1), 1.Google Scholar
- Bell, G., & Dourish, P. (2007). Yesterday's tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing's dominant vision. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 11(2), 133--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bjerknes, G. & Bratteteig, T. (1995). User Participation and Democracy. A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 7(1), 73--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P. A. (2010). Participatory design and democratizing innovation. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial participatory design conference (pp. 41--50). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable interaction design: invention & disposal, renewal & reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 503--512). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blythe, M. (2014). Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 703--712). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bowen, S. J. (2009). A critical artefact methodology: using provocative conceptual designs to foster humancentred innovation. PhD theses, Seffied Hallam University.Google Scholar
- Bowen, S. (2010). Critical theory and participatory design. In the CHI'10 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM.Google Scholar
- Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. Elements of the sociology of corporate life. London, Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
- Böhlen, M. (2006). Amy and Klara. http://www.realtechsupport.org/repository/maledicta.html (accessed 3 April 2017).Google Scholar
- Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Marjanovic, O. (2015). IS Serving the Community: The Pragmatic, the Ethical and the Moral Questions. In the proceedings of 36th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2915). AIS.Google Scholar
- Cooley, M. (1982). Architect or Bee? The human/technology relationship. Boston, South End Press.Google Scholar
- Deetz, S. (1996) Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy. Organization Science 7(2): 191--207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1--29.Google Scholar
- de Oliveira, P. J. V., & Martins, L. P. D. O. (2016). Decolonizing Ecologies of Time: Towards Speculative and Critical Design Practice in Latin America. Journal of the New Media Caucus| ISSN, 017X.Google Scholar
- DiSalvo, C. (2012). Adversarial design. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doolin, B. (1999). Information systems, power, and organizational relations: a case study. In Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1999). Pp. 286--290. AIS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 8(1), 19--30.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dunne, A. & Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects. Basel, Birkhäuser.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ehn, P. (1993). Scandinavian Design On Participation and Skill. In: Schuler D and Namioka A (eds) Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 41--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fallan, K. (2010) Design History. Understanding Theory and Method. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Ferri, G., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Louraine, S. (2014). Analyzing critical designs: Categories, distinctions, and canons of exemplars. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on designing interactive systems (pp. 355--364). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fuad-Luke, A. (2009). Design Activism. Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. London, Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Gaver, B. & Bowers, J. (2012). Annotated portfolios. interactions 19(4), 40--49 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W, J. Bowers, A. Boucher, H. Gellerson, S. Pennington, A. Schmidt, A. Steed, N. Villars, & B. Walker (2004) The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In CHI'04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 885--900). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds) (1991). Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS quarterly, 37(2), 337--355. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grimme, S., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. (2014). We've conquered dark: shedding light on empowerment in critical making. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (pp. 431--440). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hansson, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2014). Deliberation and representation in participatory tools for the public sector. In The Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2014). AIS.Google Scholar
- Hardy, C., & Leiba-O'Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human relations, 51(4), 451--483.Google Scholar
- Harmon, E., Korn, M., Light, A., & Voida, A. (2016). Designing Against the Status Quo. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 65--68). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hekkala, R., Stein, M. K., & Rossi, M. (2014). "Omega-team is Moving to Another Premise over My Dead Body"?: Power as Discursive-material Practice in an IS Project. In the 35th International Conference on Information Systems. ICIS 2014. AIS.Google Scholar
- Hevner, A., March, S: Park, J. & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly. 28(1), 75--105. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199--1216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Howcroft, D. & Wilson, M. 2003. Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer. Information and Organization 13, 1--24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iivari, N., Kinnula, M., & Kuure, L. (2015). With best intentions: A Foucauldian examination on children's genuine participation in ICT design. Information Technology & People, 28(2), 246--280.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kanungo, S. (2004). On the emancipatory role of rural information systems. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 407--422.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Korn, M., & Voida, A. (2015). Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (pp. 145--156). Aarhus University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier, Waltham, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kreps, D. G. (2009). Performing the Discourse of Sexuality Online. In the Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2009). Paper 517. AIS.Google Scholar
- Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. J. (2014). The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 3543--3552). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuznetsov, S., Odom, W., Moulder, V., DiSalvo, C., Hirsch, T., Wakkary, R., & Paulos, E. (2011). HCI, politics and the city: engaging with urban grassroots movements for reflection and action. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2409--2412). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuznetsov, S., Paulos, E., & Gross, M. D. (2010). WallBots: interactive wall-crawling robots in the hands of public artists and political activists. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 208--217). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyng, Morten (1998): Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts, Scandinavian journal of Information Systems 10:1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Labonte, R. (2004). Social inclusion/exclusion: dancing the dialectic. Health Promotion International, 19(1), 115--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Le Dantec, C. A. and DiSalvo, C. (2013). Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43(2), 241--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lievrouw, L. A. (2006). Oppositional and activist new media: remediation, reconfiguration, participation. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design, Volume 1 (pp. 115--124). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Light, A. (2011). HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with Computers, 23(5), 430--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (2000): Paradigmatic Controversies: Contradictions and Emerging Confluences. In: Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, pp. 163--188.Google Scholar
- Lippincott, J.G. (1947) Design for Business. Paul Theobald, Chigago.Google Scholar
- Lukens, J. & DiSalvo, C. (2012) Speculative Design and Technological Fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, Fall 2011, 3(4), 23--40.Google Scholar
- March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision support systems, 15(4), 251--266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- O'Connor E (1995) Paradoxes of Participation: textual analysis and organizational change. Organization Studies 16(5): 769--803.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ozaki, H. (2010). Menstruation Machine. http://www.di10.rca.ac.uk/hiromiozaki/menstruationmachine.html (accessed 3 April 2017).Google Scholar
- Papanek, V. (1973) Design for the Real World. Human Ecology and Social Change, New York, Pantheon BooksGoogle Scholar
- Pierce, J., Sengers, P., Hirsch, T., Jenkins, T., Gaver, W., & DiSalvo, C. (2015). Expanding and refining design and criticality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2083--2092). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. (2011). Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory. interactions, 18(4), 58--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanders, E.L.B. (2008). An evolving map of design practice and design research. interactions 15(6), 13--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sayer, K. & Harvey, L. (1997). Empowerment in Business Process Reengineering: An Ethnographic Study of Implementation Discourses. In the proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1997). Paper 28. AIS. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schuff, D., Turetken, O., & Zaheeruddin, A. (2010). Designing Systems that Support the Blogosphere for Deliberative Discourse. AIS Transactions on HumanComputer Interaction, 2(3), 95--111.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., & Kaye, J. J. (2005). Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility (pp. 49--58). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaw, M. C., & Stahl, B. C. (2011). On quality and communication: the relevance of critical theory to health informatics. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(3), 255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Simonsen, J., & Robertson, T. (eds.) (2012). Routledge international handbook of participatory design. New York, Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stahl B.C. (2004). Whose Discourse? A Comparison of the Foucauldian and Habermasian Concepts of Discourse in Critical IS Research. In the Proceedings of 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2004), pp 4329--4336. AIS.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B. C., Tremblay, M. C., & LeRouge, C. M. (2011). Focus groups and critical social IS research: how the choice of method can promote emancipation of respondents and researchers. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(4), 378--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thackara, J. (2005) In the bubble. Design in the compex world. Cambridge, MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tonkinwise, C. (2019. Design for Transitions - From and To What? Critical Design / Critical Futures Articles. Paper 5.Google Scholar
- Whiteley, N. (1993). Design for Society. London, Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
- Wulf, V., Aal, K., Abu Kteish, I., Atam, M., Schubert, K., Rohde, M., ... & Randall, D. (2013). Fighting against the wall: social media use by political activists in a Palestinian village. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1979--1988). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yetim, F. (2011). A set of critical heuristics for value sensitive designers and users of persuasive systems. In the Proceedings of European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2011). AIS.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Critical Design Research and Information Technology: Searching for Empowering Design
Recommendations
Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCritical Design has emerged as an important concept in HCI research and practice. Yet researchers have noted that its uptake has been limited by certain lacks of intellectual infrastructure theories, methodologies, canons and exemplars, and a community ...
Critical design in interaction design and children: impossible, inappropriate or critical imperative?
IDC '18: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenDuring past years, an increasing interest has been placed on critical design in Human Computer Interaction (HCI) and design research communities. Child Computer Interaction (CCI) research community, however, has remained quite silent about these recent ...
What is "critical" about critical design?
CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsCritical design is a research through design methodology that foregrounds the ethics of design practice, reveals potentially hidden agendas and values, and explores alternative design values. While it seems to be a timely fit for today's socially, ...
Comments