skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557111acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper argues that a new paradigm for HCI research, which we label the 'practice' perspective, has been emerging in recent years. This stands in contrast to the prevailing mainstream HCI paradigm, which we term the 'interaction' perspective. The 'practice turn', as it has been dubbed in the social sciences, provides a conceptual frame to organize a variety of issues emerging in more recent HCI research. While this approach has been present in certain strands of HCI research for some time, it has not been articulated fully to date. In this paper, we provide a short account of the main tenets of this perspective, and then show how it can illuminate some of the recent debates within HCI. Our argument is one which does not seek to replace extant HCI theories, but rather to provide an alternative, complementary theoretical lens which may illuminate the present confusion among both researchers and practitioners as to the direction of HCI. The paper articulates a set of issues which can help direct HCI research programs, as well as highlighting the potential contribution of the HCI field to this practice approach itself, in terms of a more nuanced understanding of emerging practices.

References

  1. Bannon, L. J. Reimagining HCI: Toward a More Humancentered Perspective. interactions 18 (4) (July): 50--57. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bannon, L., & S. Bødker, S. Beyond the interface: Encountering artifacts. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human Computer Interface (pp. 227--253). New York: Cambridge University Press (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bentley, R., J. A. Hughes, D. Randall, T. Rodden, P. Sawyer, D. Shapiro, & Sommerville, I. "Ethnographically-Informed Systems Design for Air Traffic Control." In Proc. of ACM CSCW'92, pp. 123--129. (1992) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco. (1997) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P. & Kyng, M. ed. Computers and Democracy - a Scandinavian Challenge. Gower Publishing Ltd., Avebury, (1987).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bødker, S. A human activity approach to user interfaces. Human Computer Interaction 4: 171--195. (1989) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bødker, S. "When Second Wave HCI Meets Third Wave Challenges." In Proc. of the 4th NordiCHI Conference, 1--8. (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bødker, S. & Andersen, P. B. "Complex Mediation." Human-Computer Interaction 20 (4): 353--402. (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carroll, J. M. (Ed.). Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface (Vol. 4). Cambridge Univ. Press, New York (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dourish, P. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehn, P. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm. (1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Forlizzi, J. The product ecology: Understanding social product use and supporting design culture. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 11--20. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. Design: cultural probes. interactions, 6(1), 21--29. (1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gross, S., Bardzell, J., & Bardzell, S. Structures, forms, and stuff: the materiality and medium of interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 1--13. (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., & Siegel, M. Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life?. In Proc. of the 5th NordiCHI Conference (pp. 201--210). ACM. (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaptelinin, V. & Bannon, L. J. Interaction Design Beyond the Product: Creating Technology-Enhanced Activity Spaces. Human-Computer Interaction, vol 27, no. 3, pp. 277--309, (2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. Activity theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections. Synthesis Lectures Human-Centered Informatics, 5(1), 1--105. (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, (1962).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuutti, K., Activity Theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research, in B. Nardi (Ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction, MIT Press: Cambridge. p. 17--44. (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kuutti, K. "The Concept of Activity as a Basic Unit of Analysis for CSCW Research." In Proc. of the 2nd ECSCW Conference, pp. 249--264. (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Landauer, T.K. "Let's Get Real: A Position Paper on the Role of Cognitive Psychology in the Design of Humanly Useful and Usable Systems." In J. M. Carroll (Ed.) Designing Interaction, 60--73. Cambridge University Press, New York. (1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Light, A., & Wright, P. The panopticon and the performance arena: HCI reaches within. In HumanComputer Interaction-INTERACT 2009 (pp. 201--204). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lyytinen, K.J., and O.K. Ngwenyama. "What Does Computer Support for Cooperative Work Mean" A Structurational Analysis of Computer Supported Cooperative Work.? Accounting, Management and Information Technologie 2 (1): 19--37. (1992).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Macy, M.W. & Flache, A. Beyond Rationality in Models of Choice. Ann. Rev. Sociol., vol 21, pp. 73--91. (1995).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. March, J. G. How Decisions Happen in Organizations. Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 6, pp. 95--117. (1991) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D. & Yanow, D. "Re-Turn to Practice: An Introductory Essay." Organization Studies 30 (12): 1309--1327. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Nicolini, D. Practice Theory, Work, & Organization. An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Orlikowski, W.J. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations." Organization Science 3 (3): 398--427. (1992).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Orlikowski, W.J., and S.V. Scott. "Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization." Annals of the Academy of Management 2 (1): 433--474. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Pierce, J., Strengers, Y., Sengers, P., and Bødker, S. Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI. ACM Trans. ComputerHuman Interaction 20, 4, Article 20 (September 2013), 8 pages. (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Reckwitz, A. "Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing." European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243--263. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Rogers, Y. HCI Theory. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, Ca. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Salovaara, A., Höök, K., Cheverst, K., Twidale, M., Chalmers, M., & Sas, C. Appropriation and creative use: linking user studies and design. In Proc. of CHI 2011 Extended Abstracts (pp. 37--40). ACM. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. & Savigny, E. Von. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Routledge, London. (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt, K. The concept of 'practice': What's the point? To be published in the Proc. of 11th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (COOP 2014). (forthcoming 2014)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Schmidt, K. Cooperative Work and Coordinative Practices. Contributions to the Conceptual Foundations of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). Springer, London. (2011) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Schmidt, K. & Simone, C. "Coordination Mechanisms: Towards a Conceptual Foundation of CSCW Systems Design." Computer Supported Cooperative Work 5 (2/3): 155--200. (1996). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Thomas, J. C., & Kellogg, W. A. Minimizing ecological gaps in interface design. Software, IEEE, 6 (1), 78--86. (1989). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Stevens, G., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. Appropriation infrastructure: mediating appropriation and production work. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 22(2), 58--81. (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Vines, B. W., Wanderley, M. M., Krumhansl, C. L., Nuzzo, R. L., & Levitin, D. J. Performance gestures of musicians: What structural and emotional information do they convey?. In Gesture-based communication in human-computer interaction (pp. 468--478). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wiberg, M., Ishii, H., Dourish, P., Vallgårda, A., Kerridge, T., Sundström, P., & Rolston, M. Materiality matters -- experience materials. interactions, 20(2), 5457. (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wulf, V., M. Rohde, V. Pipek, and G. Stevens. "Engaging with Practices: Design Case Studies as a Research Framework in CSCW." In Proceedigns of CSCW 2011, ACM, pp. 505--512. (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader