skip to main content
10.1145/2384916.2384939acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens

Published:22 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Touchscreen devices have become increasingly popular. Yet they lack of tactile feedback and motor stability, making it difficult effectively typing on virtual keyboards. This is even worse for elderly users and their declining motor abilities, particularly hand tremor. In this paper we examine text-entry performance and typing patterns of elderly users on touch-based devices. Moreover, we analyze users' hand tremor profile and its relationship to typing behavior. Our main goal is to inform future designs of touchscreen keyboards for elderly people. To this end, we asked 15 users to enter text under two device conditions (mobile and tablet) and measured their performance, both speed- and accuracy-wise. Additionally, we thoroughly analyze different types of errors (insertions, substitutions, and omissions) looking at touch input features and their main causes. Results show that omissions are the most common error type, mainly due to cognitive errors, followed by substitutions and insertions. While tablet devices can compensate for about 9% of typing errors, omissions are similar across conditions. Measured hand tremor largely correlates with text-entry errors, suggesting that it should be approached to improve input accuracy. Finally, we assess the effect of simple touch models and provide implications to design.

References

  1. Bain et al. Assessing the impact of essential tremor on upper limb function. Journal of neurology, 241(1):54--61, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta et al. The effects of walking speed on target acquisition on a touchscreen interface. In Proc. of MHCI'11, 143--146, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chung et al. Usability evaluation of numeric entry tasks on keypad type and age. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(1):97--105, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Elble and Koller. Tremor. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Findlater and Wobbrock. Personalized input: Improving ten-finger touchscreen typing through automatic adaptation. In Proc. of CHI'12, 815--824, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Froehlich et al. Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. In Proc. of ASSETS'07, 19--26, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Goetz et al. Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified parkinson's disease rating scale (mds-updrs): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Movement disorders, 23(15):2129--2170, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Gunawardana et al. Usability guided key-target resizing for soft keyboards. In Proc. of IUI'10, 111--118, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jin et al. Touch screen user interfaces for older adults: button size and spacing. Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity, 933--941, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kristensson. Five challenges for intelligent text entry methods. AI Magazine, 30(4):85, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kurniawan. Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(12):889--901, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. MacKenzie and Soukoreff. Text entry for mobile computing: Models and methods, theory and practice. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(2):147--198, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nicolau and Jorge. Touch typing using thumbs: understanding the effect of mobility and hand posture. In Proc. of CHI '12, 2683--2686, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Salarian et al. Quantification of tremor and bradykinesia in parkinson's disease using a novel ambulatory monitoring system. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 54(2):313--322, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Selker et al. Psychosocial indicators via hand tremor. In Proc. of INTERACT'11, 596--599, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Strickland and Bertoni. Parkinson's prevalence estimated by a state registry. Movement disorders, 19(3):318--323, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wacharamanotham et al. Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. In Proc. of CHI'11, 623--626, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wobbrock et al. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. In Proc. of UIST'03, 70, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Elderly text-entry performance on touchscreens

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ASSETS '12: Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
      October 2012
      321 pages
      ISBN:9781450313216
      DOI:10.1145/2384916

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader