skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Elderly users suffering from hand tremor have difficulties interacting with touchscreens because of finger oscillation. It has been previously observed that sliding one's finger across the screen may help reduce this oscillation. In this work, we empirically confirm this advantage by (1) measuring finger oscillation during different actions and (2) comparing error rate and user satisfaction between traditional tapping and swabbing in which the user slides his finger towards a target on a screen edge to select it. We found that oscillation is generally reduced during sliding. Also, compared to tapping, swabbing resulted in improved error rates and user satisfaction. We believe that swabbing will make touchscreens more accessible to senior users with tremor.

References

  1. R. Balakrishnan and I. MacKenzie. Performance differences in the fingers, wrist, and forearm in computer input control. Proc. CHI'97, 303--310, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Deuschl, P. Bain, M. Brin, and A. H. S. Committee. Consensus statement of the movement disorder society on tremor. MOVEMENT DISORD, 13(S3):2--23, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Froehlich, J. Wobbrock, and S. Kane. Barrier pointing: Using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. Proc. ASSETS'07, 19--26, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Graham. Using an accelerometer sensor to measure human hand motion. Master Thesis, MIT, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Guerreiro, H. Nicolau, J. Jorge, and D. Goncalves. Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics. Proc. Mobile HCI'10, 31--34, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hourcade and T. Berkel. Simple pen interaction performance of young and older adults using handheld computers. INTERACT COMPUT, 20(1):166--183, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Lewis. Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability studies. INT J HUM-COMPUT INT, 14(3&4):463--488, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. E. Louis and J. Ferreira. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. MOVEMENT DISORD, 25(5):534--541, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. Mertens, N. Jochems, C. Schlick, D. Dunnebacke, and J. Dornberg. Design pattern TRABING: touchscreen-based input technique for people affected by intention tremor. Proc. EICS'10, 267--272, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. Rogers, M. O'Brien, and A. McLaughlin. Selection and design of input devices for assistive technologies. Proc. ICARCV'06, 1--6, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. K. Watkins, H. Fu, R. Fuentes, A. Ghosh, C. Giamberardini, C. Johansson, C. Kuonqui, A. Montes, D. Stewart, and C. Ugaz. Human development report 2005. United Nations Development Programme, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Wobbrock and K. Gajos. Goal crossing with mice and trackballs for people with motor impairments: Performance, submovements, and design directions. TACCESS, 1(1):4:1--4:37, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader