skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1753857acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

There's methodology in the madness: toward critical HCI ethnography

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We examine the expansion of topic areas for qualitative research in HCI publications, focusing on representations of users and field sites. We examine further developments in anthropological methodologies during a critical period of the late 1980s and 90s. We identify concerns shared by both research communities, in particular, the relationships between researcher and informant, and the construction of bounded settings for field work. We then argue that ethnographic approaches and theoretical commitments which came to the fore after Anthropology's critical turn can be usefully applied, in ways that can inspire design, to investigations of social practice and technology appropriation.

References

  1. Abu-Lughod, L. (1991) Writing against culture. Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, 137--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkhuus, L. and Rode, J. (2007) From Mice To Men. Ext. Abs. ACM SIGCHI, ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G., Blythe, M., and Sengers, P. (2005) Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Transaction on Computer Human Interaction (TOCHI) 12, 2, 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Clifford, J. (1983) On Ethnographic Authority. Representations, 2, 118--146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cooper, G. and Bowers, J. (1995) Representing the user: notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of human-computer interaction. In The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces. Cambridge University Press, 48--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dourish, P. (2001) Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dourish, P. (2006) Implications for Design. Proc. ACM SIGCHI, ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Geertz, C. (1973) The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., and Sengers, P. (2007) The Three Paradigms of HCI. Ext. Abs. ACM SIGCHI, ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mainwaring, S., Anderson, K., and Chang, M. (2004) Living for the Global City: Mobile Kits, Urban Interfaces, and Ubicomp. Proc Ubicomp, Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Malinowski, B. (1967) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Marcus, G. (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24,1. 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marsden, G., Maunder, A., and Parker, M. (2008) People are people but technology is not technology. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 366. 3795--3804.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mellis, D., Banzi, M., Cuartielles, D., and Igoe, T. (2007) Arduino: An Open Electronic Prototyping Platform. Ext. Abs. ACM SIGCHI, ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Narayan, K. (1993) How Native is a "Native" Anthropologist? American Anthropologist 95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielson, J. (1993) Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ortner, Sherry. Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, 1(1995), 173--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Parikh, T., Javid, P., Ghosh, K., and Toyama, K. (2006) Mobile phones and paper documents: Evaluating a new approach for capturing microfinance data in rural India. Proc. SIGCHI, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Salvador, T., Bell, G., and Anderson, K. (1999) Design Ethnography. Design Management Journal 10, 4. 35--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Williams, A., Anderson, K., and Dourish, P. (2008) Anchored Mobilities: Mobile Technology and Transnational Migration. Proc. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. There's methodology in the madness: toward critical HCI ethnography

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2219 pages
      ISBN:9781605589305
      DOI:10.1145/1753846

      Copyright © 2010 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '10 Paper Acceptance Rate350of1,346submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader