skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208560acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Next steps for value sensitive design

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Questions of human values often arise in HCI research and practice. Such questions can be difficult to address well, and a principled approach can clarify issues of both theory and practice. One such approach is Value Sensitive Design (VSD), an established theory and method for addressing issues of values in a systematic and principled fashion in the design of information technology. In this essay, we suggest however that the theory and at times the presentation of VSD overclaims in a number of key respects, with the result of inhibiting its more widespread adoption and appropriation. We address these issues by suggesting four topics for next steps in the evolution of VSD: (1) tempering VSD's position on universal values; (2) contextualizing existing and future lists of values that are presented as heuristics for consideration; (3) strengthening the voice of the participants in publications describing VSD investigations; and (4) making clearer the voice of the researchers. We propose new or altered approaches for VSD that address these issues of theory, voice, and reportage.

References

  1. Albrechtslund, A. Ethics and technology design. Ethics and Info. Tech. 9(1), 63--72, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alcoff, L. The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique 20 (Winter 1991-1992), 5--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsheikh, T., Rode, J. and Lindley, S. (Whose) Value-Sensitive Design? A Study of Long-Distance Relationships in an Arabic Cultural Context. Proc. CSCW 2011, ACM Press (2011), 75--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bardzell, S. and Bardzell, J. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: Social science, feminism, and HCI. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 675--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bardzell, S., and Churchill, E., (eds.), Interacting with Computers, special issue on feminism, in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Beeson, I., and Miskelly, C. Dialogue and dissent in stories of community. Proc. PDC 2000. New York: CPSR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., and Turule, J., Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind, Basic, 1987/1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Benedict, E., The wind won't know me: A history of the Navajo-Hopi land dispute. Knopf, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Best, M., Smyth, T., Serrano-Baquero, D., and Etherton, J. Designing for and with diaspora: A case study of work for the truth and reconciliation commission of Liberia. Ext Abstracts CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 2903--2918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bickel, B. Weapons of magic: Afghan women asserting voice via the Net. JCMC 8(2), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjerknes, G., Ehn, P., and Kyng, M. (eds.). Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge. Avebury, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT design: Designing for business and workplace realities. MIT Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D., & Sundblad, Y. Co-operative Design - perspectives on 20 years with 'the Scandinavian IT Design Model'. Proc. NordiCHI 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Borning, A., Friedman, B., and Kahn, P. H., Jr. Designing for Human Values in an Urban Simulation System: Value Sensitive Design and Participatory Design. Short paper, Proc. PDC 2004, Toronto, July 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Borning, A., Friedman, B., Davis, J. and Lin. P. Informing public deliberation: Value sensitive design of indicators for a large-scale urban simulation. Proc. ECSCW 2005, Springer (2005), 449--468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Charmaz, K., & Mitchell, R. G. Jr. The myth of silent authorship: Self, substance, and style in ethnographic writing. In Hertz, R. (ed), Reflexivity and Voice, Sage, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cockton, G. Value-centred HCI. Proc. NordiCHI'04, Tampere, Finland, 2004, 149--160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Cockton, G. Getting there: Six meta-principles and interaction design. Proc CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 2223--2232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Crabtree, A. Ethnography in participatory design. Proc. PDC 1998, Seattle, CPSR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cummings, M. Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(4), 701--715, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Davis, J. Design methods for ethical persuasive computing. Persuasive '09, ACM Press (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dourish, P. Implications for design. Proc. CHI 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Dourish, P. Ethnography. Tutorial presented at the Human Computer Interaction Consortium (HCIC), Winter Park, CO, Feb. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ess, C., and Sudweeks, F. On the edge: Cultural barriers and catalysts to IT diffusion among remote and marginalized communities. New Media & Soc, 3(3), 259--269, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., and Nissenbaum, H. Values at play: Design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design. CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 751--760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Flanagan, M., Howe, D., and Nissenbaum, H. Embodying values in technology: Theory and practice. In J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert (eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008, 322--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, B., and Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. A. Jacko and A. Sears (eds.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 1177--1201. Mahwah Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Friedman, B., Freier, N. G., and Kahn, P. H., Jr. Office window of the future? Two case studies of an augmented window. Ext Abstracts CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004), 1559. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr. and Borning, A. Value sensitive design and information systems. In P. Zhang and D. Galletta (eds.), Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Friedman, B., Höök, K., Gill, B. T., Eidmar, L., Sallmander Prien, C., and Severson, R. L. Personlig integritet: A comparative study of perceptions of privacy in public places in Sweden and the United States. Proc. NordiCHI 2008, 142--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Friedman, B., Borning, A., Davis, J. L., Gill, B. T., Kahn, Jr., P., Kriplean, T. and Lin, P. Laying the foundations for public participation and value advocacy: Interaction design for a large scale urban simulation. Proc 9th Annual International Conf. on Digital Government Research (dg.o2008), 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Friedman, B., Nathan, L. P., Lake, M., Grey, N. G., Nilsen, T. T., Utter, R. F., Utter, E. J., Ring, M., & Kahn, Z. Multi-lifespan information system design in post-conflict societies: An evolving project in Rwanda. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 2833--2844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Friedman, B., Nathan, L. P., Kane, S. and Lin, J. Envisioning Cards. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2011. Available at: http://envisioningcards.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Haraway, D. J. A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Haraway, D. J. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_Oncomouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. Routledge, New York, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Harding, S. The Science Question in Feminism, Cornell University Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Harding, S. (ed). The Feminist Standpoint Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, Routledge, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Harrison, S., Sengers, P., and Tatar, D. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. To appear in Interacting with Computers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Hayes, G. R. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. TOCHI 18(3), 2011, 15:1--15:20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Hendry, D. G., and Friedman, B. Theories and practices of design for information systems: Eight design perspectives in ten short weeks. Proc. DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 435--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in America, Free Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Hourcade, J. P., Bullock-Rest, N. E., Friedman, B., Nelson, M., Shneiderman, B., and Zephiris, P. HCI for peace: From idealism to concrete steps. Proc CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 613--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K., and Grinter, R. E. Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Isomursu, M., Kuutti, K., and Väinämö, S. (2004). Experience clip: Method for user participation and evaluation of mobile concepts. Proceedings of PDC 2004. Toronto: CPSR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Lafreniére, D. (1996). CUTA: A simple, practical, and lowcost approach to task analysis. Interactions 3(5), 35--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lassiter, E. L. The Chicago Guide to Collaborative Ethnography, University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Le Dantec, C. A., Poole, E. S. and Wyche, S. P. Values as lived experience: Evolving Value Sensitive Design in support of value discovery. Proc CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1141--1150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Leidner, D. E., and Kayworth, T. A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict. Mgmt. Info. Sys. Quart. 30(2), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Millett, L., Friedman, B., and Felten, E. Cookies and web browser design: Toward realizing informed consent online. Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 46--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Miller, J., Friedman, B., Jancke, G., and Gill, B. Value tensions in design: The value sensitive design, development, and appropriation of a corporation's groupware system, Proc. GROUP 2007, ACM Press (2007), 281--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Muller, M. Ethnocritical heuristics for reflecting on work with users and other interested parties. In M. Kyng and L. Mathiassen, Computers and Design in Context, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Muller, M. J., and Carey, K. Design as a minority discipline in a software company: Toward requirements for a community of practice. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 383--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Muller, M. Revisiting an ethnocritical approach to HCI: Verbal privilege and translation. In T. Erickson & D. McDonald (eds.), HCI remixed: Reflections on notable HCI papers, MIT Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Muller, M. and Druin, A. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In J. Jacko (ed.), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook (3rd edition), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mumford, L. Technics and Civilization. University of Chicago Press, 2010. (Originally published 1934, Harcourt, Inc.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S. K., and Miller, J. K. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. Proc. DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Nathan, L. P., Lake, M., Gray, N. C, Nilsen, T., Utter, R. F., Utter, E. J., Ring, M., Kahn, Z., & Friedman, B. Multi-lifespan information system design: Investigating a new design approach in Rwanda, Proc. iConference 2011, ACM Press (2011), 591--597. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Patton, J. W. (2000). Picturing commutes: Informant photography and urban design. Proc. PDC 2000. New York: CPSR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Pew, R. W., and Mavor, A. S. Human-system Integration in the System Development Process: A New Look, National Academies Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Piecowye, J. Habitus in transition? CMC use and impacts among young women in the United Arab Emirates. JCMC 8(2), 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Rode, J. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. To appear in Interacting with Computers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Saab, D. J. An ethnorelative framework for information system design. Proc. Fourteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Sanders, E. B.-N. Generative tools for co-designing. Proc. CoDesigning 2000. London: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Scales-Trent, J. Racial purity laws in the United States and Nazi Germany: The targeting process, Human Rights Quart. 23(2), 260--307, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.). Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Stubblefield, A. "Beyond the pale": Tainted whiteness, cognitive disability, and eugenic sterilization. Hypatia 22(2), 163--181, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Suchman, L., and Trigg, R. Understanding practice: Video as a medium for reflection and design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng (eds.), Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ USA, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Tschudy, M. W., Dykstra-Erickson, E. A., and Holloway, M. S. PictureCARD: A storytelling tool for task analysis. Proc PDC'96, CPSR, Cambridge MA USA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Wahlsten, D. The malleability of intelligence is not constrained by heredity, in Devlin, B., Feinberg, S. E., Resnick, D. P., & Roeber, K. (eds), Intelligence, Genes, and Success: Scientists Respond to The Bell Curve. Springer-Verlag, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker, S., and Dearden, A. Designing for civil society. Interacting with Computers 17(1), 2005, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Wang, C., Burris, M. A., and Ping, X. Y. Chinese village women as visual anthropologists: A participatory approach to reaching policymakers. Social Science and Medicine 42 (10), 1996, 1391--1440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Weiner, N. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Weizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment to Calculation. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Winner, L. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109(1), Winter 1980, 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Woelfer, J. P., and Hendry, D. G. Homeless young people's experiences with information systems: Life and work in a community technology center. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 1291--1300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Woelfer, J. P., Iverson, A., Hendry, D. G., Friedman, B. and Gill, B. Improving the safety of homeless young people with mobile phones: Values, form and function. Proc CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 1707--1716. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Wyche, S. P. Investigating religion and computing: A case for using standpoint theory in technology evaluation studies. PhD dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Next steps for value sensitive design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader