skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2208561acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Being in the thick of in-the-wild studies: the challenges and insights of researcher participation

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe the insights and challenges offered by researcher participation in in-the-wild studies through the comparison of two prototype evaluations with varying levels of researcher participation. By reflecting on these studies we expose different facets of the researcher's role when interacting with participants in in-the-wild studies. We also demonstrate the value of researcher participation in contributing to the way a researcher understands participant responses: aiding rapport, promoting empathy and stimulating the researcher to reflect on their own assumptions.

References

  1. Atkinson, P. & Hammersley, M. Ethnography and participant observation, Handbook of qualitative research, vol. 1, 248--261, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, B., Reeves, S. & Sherwood, S. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods, in Proc. CHI 2011, 1657--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dourish, P. & Bell, G. Divining a digital future: mess and mythology in ubiquitous computing, MIT Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gaver, W., Bowers, J., Kerridge, T., Boucher, A., & Jarvis, N. Anatomy of a failure: how we knew when our design went wrong, and what we learned from it, in Proc. CHI 2009, 2213--2222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gaver, W., Cultural commentators: Non-native interpretations as resources for polyphonic assessment, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 65, pp. 292--305, Apr. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Greenberg, S. & Buxton, B., Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time), in Proc. CHI 2008, 111--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Grudin, J., Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers, Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, pp. 92--105, Jan. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harper, R. H. R., The organisation in ethnography--a discussion of ethnographic fieldwork programs in CSCW, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 239--264, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Hayes, G. R., The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 18, pp. 1--20, July 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jambon, F. & Meillon, B., User experience evaluation in the wild, in CHI EA 2009, 4069--4074. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kientz, J. A. & Abowd, G. D., When the designer becomes the user: designing a system for therapists by becoming a therapist, in CHI EA 2008, 2071--2078. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Light, A., Adding method to meaning: a technique for exploring peoples' experience with technology, Behaviour & Information Technology,.25, 2, pp. 175-- 187, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Marshall, P., Morris, R., Rogers, Y., Kreitmayer, S. & Davies, M., Rethinking multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface, in Proc. CHI 2011, 3033--3042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Petitmengin, C., Describing one's subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 229--269, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rode, J. A., Reflexivity in Digital Anthropology, in Proc. CHI 2011, 123--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rogers, Y., Interaction design gone wild: striving for wild theory, Interactions, 18:4, 58--62, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Tedesco, L., Hazlewood, W. R., Kurtz, A., Hall, R. E., Hursey, J. & Toscos, T., Why it's worth the hassle: the value of in-situ studies when designing Ubicomp, in Proc. UbiComp 2007, 336--353. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rogers, Y., Hazlewood, W. R., Marshall, P., Dalton, N., & Hertrich, S., Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change?, in Proc. UbiComp 2010, 261--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sengers, P. and Gaver, B., Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation, in Proc. DIS 2006, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. van der Linden, J., Johnson, R., Bird, J., Rogers, Y. & Schoonderwaldt, E., Buzzing to play: lessons learned from an in the wild study of real-time vibrotactile feedback, in Proc. CHI 2011, 533--542. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wright, P. & McCarthy, J., Empathy and experience in HCI, in Proc. CHI 2008, 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Being in the thick of in-the-wild studies: the challenges and insights of researcher participation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader