skip to main content
10.1145/1394445.1394492acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Theories and practice of design for information systems: eight design perspectives in ten short weeks

Published:25 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students come to design education with different goals. Some seek to acquire expertise in design, others to learn specialized methods tailored to a research domain. Furthermore, students in the area of information system design confront a large literature of diverse perspectives on design, all of which are potentially useful. To disentangle this literature and to develop students' knowledge and know-how for design, a ten-week course, titled Theories and Practice of Design for Information Systems, was developed. Pedagogically, this introductory course is neither a studio course nor a methods course. Instead, it takes a "design perspectives" approach where students engage a number of substantial perspectives on design through conceptual and experiential study. This paper introduces this pedagogical approach and describes eight design perspectives including readings, key questions, and activities. It concludes with lessons learned for positioning students to engage the interplay between the theory and practice of information system design.

References

  1. Alexander, C. The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bang, M. Picture This: Perception & Composition. A Bull Finch Press Book of Little Brown and Company, Boston MA, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bucciarelli, L. L. Designing Engineers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bucciarelli, L. L. Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, 5, 3 (1984), 185--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Card, S., Moran, T. and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Carroll, J. M. Five reasons for scenario-based design. In HICSS '99: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society, 1999, 3051. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Erickson, T. (2000). Lingua francas for design: Sacred places and pattern languages. Proceedings of DIS '00. ACM Press, New York, 2000, 357--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Floyd, C., Mehl, W., Reisin, F., Schmidt, G. and Wolf, G. Out of Scandinavia: Alternative approaches to software design and system development. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 4 (1989), 253--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Friedman, B. Value Sensitive Design. http://projects.ischool.washington.edu/vsd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H., Jr., and Borning, A. Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In P. Zhang & D. Galletta (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations. M. E. Sharpe, New York, 2006, 348--372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg, S. Working through task-centered system design. In D. Diaper & N. Stanton (Eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, 2003, 49--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Human-Centered Computing Education Digital library, http://hcc.cc.gatech.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendry, D. G., S. Mackenzie, A. Kurth, F. Spielberg, and J. Larkin. Evaluating paper prototypes on the street. In Extended Abstracts of CHI'05. ACM Press, New York, 2005, 1447--1450. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Holtzblatt, K. and Beyer, H. Making customer-centered design work for teams. Communications of the ACM, 36, 10 (1993), 92--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Illich, I. Tools for conviviality. Harper & Row, New York, 1973, Chap. 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Isenmann, S., and Reuter, W. D. IBIS---a convincing concept…but a lousy instrument? Proceedings of DIS'97. ACM Press, New York, 1997, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jones, J. C. Design Methods (2nd Edition). John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kensing, F. and Madsen, K. H. Generating visions: Future workshops and metaphorical design. In J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991, 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kuhn, S. Learning from the architectural studio: Implications for project-base pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17, 4--5 (2001), 349--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lane, D. M., Napier, H. A., Batsell, R. R. and Naman, J. L. Predicting the skilled use of hierarchical menus with the keystroke-level model. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 2 (1993), 185--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Moran, T. P. and Carroll, J. M. Overview of Design Rationale. In T. P. Moran and J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1996, Chap. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mountford, J. S. Tools and techniques for creative design. In B. Laurel (ed). The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1990, 17--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Petroski, H. Invention by Design: How Engineers get from Thought to Thing, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1996, Chap. 1, 3, 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pruitt, J. and Grudin, J. Personas: practice and theory. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences. ACM Press, New York, 2003, 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rittel, H. W. J. and Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4 (1973), 155--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Rosson, M. B. and Carroll, J. M. Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Morgan Kaufmann, New York, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Schön, D. A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1991, Chap. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Simon, H. A. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Van Duyne, D. K., Landay, J. A., and Hong, J. I. The Design of Sites: Patterns, principles, and process for crafting a customer-centered web experience. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Wilde, J. and Wilde, R. Visual Literacy. Watson-Guptill, New York, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Winograd, T. and Flores, F. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1986, Chap. 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Theories and practice of design for information systems: eight design perspectives in ten short weeks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader