skip to main content
10.1145/2207676.2207750acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From death to final disposition: roles of technology in the post-mortem interval

Published:05 May 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe collaborative processes and stakeholders involved in the period from when a person dies until they are laid to rest: the funeral, final disposition of the body, and (in some circumstances) victim identification. The rich mixture of technologies currently deployed during this brief period are categorized and critically analyzed. We then reflect on the implications of our findings, both for the design of technology that takes the end of life into account, and for the wider HCI community.

References

  1. Anderson, K. The Value-added Tombstone. The Death Reference Desk, 2011. http://deathreferencedesk.org/2011/05/22/the-valueadded-tombstone/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakos, Y. The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet. Communications of the ACM 41, 8 (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bambuck, M. Online Funerals a Growing Trend? - ABC News. ABC News, 2007. http://abcnews.go.com/International/story?id=2947262& page=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bikker, J. Experimental studies into modal and joint modal comparison of compromised genetic and dental data in disaster victim identification. Doctoral Thesis. University of Sheffield. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brubaker, J. R. and Vertesi, J. Death and the Social Network. Proc. CHI Workshop on Death and the Social Network, (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Budowle, B., Bieber, F. R., and Eisenberg, A. J. Forensic aspects of mass disasters: Strategic considerations for DNA-based human identification. Legal Medicine 7, 4 (2005), 230--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Carroll, E. and Romano, J. Your Digital Afterlife. New Riders, Berkeley, CA, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chevalier, J. and Morton, F. S. State Casket Sales and Restrictions: A Pointless Undertaking? 2006, 1--31. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Citizens Advice Bureau. What to do after a death. 2011. http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/your_family/family_index_ew/what_to_do_after_a_death.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowling, C. The Good Funeral Guide. 2011. http://www.goodfuneralguide.co.uk/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Doka, K. J. Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, USA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. FuneralResources.com. Funeral Memorial Services, Funeral Plan, Funeral Costs, Grief. 2010. http://www.funeralresources.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonsalves, A. Basic Funerals Bets Baby Boomers Will Arrange Cremations Online. Bloomberg News, 2011. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-05/basicfunerals-bets-baby-boomers-will-arrange-cremationsonline.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Haley, W. E., Larson, D. G., Kasl-Godley, J., Neimeyer, R. A., and Kwilosz, D. M. Roles for Psychologists in End-of-Life Care: Emerging Models of Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34, 6 (2003), 626--633.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Harrington, D. E. Breathing Life into the Funeral Market. Regulation Spring, 2003, 14--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Holle, M. Inventing the Future of Death. Death Reference Desk, 2010. http://deathreferencedesk.org/2010/05/24/inventing-thefuture-of-death/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Holson, L. M. Private Funerals Now Streamed Online. NYTimes.com, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/25/fashion/25death.html?_r=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes, A. L., Palen, L., Sutton, J., Liu, S. B., and Vieweg, S. Site-seeing in disaster: An examination of on-line social convergence. Proc. 5th International ISCRAM Conference, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenyon International Emergency Services. Kenyon Response is here! 2011. http://www.kenyoninternational.com/forum/showthread.php?t=241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., and Nickman, S. L. Continuing bonds: new understandings of grief. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC., USA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. London Assembly. Report of the 7/7 review committee. London, UK, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lorton, L. and Langley, W. Design and use of a computer-assisted postmortem identification system. J Forensic Sci 3, (1986), 972--981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Maciejewski, P. K., Zhang, B., Block, S. D., and Prigerson, H. G. An empirical examination of the stage theory of grief. JAMA 297, 7 (2007), 716--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Massimi, M. and Baecker, R. M. Dealing with death in design: Developing systems for the bereaved. Proc. CHI'11, ACM (2011), 1001--1010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Massimi, M., Moncur, W., Odom, W., Banks, R., and Kirk, D. Memento Mori: Technology Design for the End of Life. Proc. CHI'12, ACM (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Massimi, M., Odom, W., Banks, R., and Kirk, D. Matters of life and death: Locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented HCI research. Proc. CHI'11, ACM (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Moncur, W. and LePlatre, G. Pictures at the ATM: Exploring the usability of multiple graphical passwords. Proc. CHI'07, ACM (2007), 887--894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Moncur, W. and Waller, A. Digital Inheritance. RCUK Digital Futures 2010, Horizon Digital Economy Research (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Mullany, A. and Jantzen, D. After Japan's earthquake and tsunami, tech tools provide information and help families reconnect. NYDailyNews.com, 2011. http://www.nydailynews.com/tech_guide/2011/03/11/2011-0311_how_technology_is_helping_in_the_aftermath_of_japans_earthquake_and_tsunami.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Muller, M. J. Participatory design: The third space in HCI. In A. Sears and J. A. Jacko, eds., The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Oxford, UK, 2008, 10610--1081.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., and Banks, R. Passing on and putting to rest: Understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. Proc. CHI'10, ACM (2010), 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Piccinini A., Betti F., Capra M., Cattaneo, C. The identification of the victims of the Linate air crash by DNA analysis. International Congress Series 1 1261, (2004), 39--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Prigerson, H. G. and Jacobs, S. C. Traumatic grief as a distinct disorder: A rationale, consensus criteria, and a preliminary empirical test. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe and H. A. W. Schut, eds., Handbook of Bereavement Research: Consequences, Coping, and Care. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 2001, 613--647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Pullin, G. and Newell, A. Focussing on extra-ordinary users. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human computer interaction: coping with diversity, Springer-Verlag (2007), 253--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Robins, D. and Holmes, J. Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Process Management 44, 1 (2008), 386--399. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ross, W. Ethical issues involved in online counseling. Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture 2, 1 (2011), 54--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Schwarz, J. and Morris, M. Augmenting web pages and search results to support credibility assessment. Proc. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 1245--1254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Tintarev, N. and Masthoff, J. Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems: Methodological issues and empirical studies on the impact of personalization. UMUAI (Accepted, to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Troyer, J. Technologies of the Human Corpse. University of North Carolina Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Uriu, D. and Okude, N. ThanatoFenestra: photographic family altar supporting a ritual to pray for the deceased. Proc. DIS'10, ACM (2010), 422--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Walter, T., Hourizi, R., Moncur, W., and Pitsillides, S. Does the internet change how we die and mourn? An overview. Omega: Journal of Death & Dying 64, 4 (2011-12), 275--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Walter, T. Mediator Deathwork. Death Studies 29, 5 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Wirral Borough Council. Tell Us Once service. 2011. http://www.wirral.gov.uk/my-services/community-andliving/deaths-cemeteries-and-crematoria/registeringdeath/tell-us-once-service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Worden, J. W. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Worthing Borough Council. Attend a Service Web-cast. 2008. http://www.worthing.gov.uk/worthingsservices/cemeteriesandcrematoriums/crematoriums/attendaserviceweb-cast/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Zaslow, J. If TiVo Thinks You Are Gay, Here's How to Set It Straight. Wall Street Journal November 2, (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From death to final disposition: roles of technology in the post-mortem interval

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2012
      3276 pages
      ISBN:9781450310154
      DOI:10.1145/2207676

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 May 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader