Lori McCay-Peet
Mounia Lalmas
ABSTRACT
We study how the visual catchiness (saliency) of relevant information impacts user engagement metrics such as focused attention and emotion (affect). Participants completed tasks in one of two conditions, where the task-relevant information either appeared salient or non-salient. Our analysis provides insights into relationships between saliency, focused attention, and affect. Participants reported more distraction in the non-salient condition, and non-salient information was slower to find than salient. Lack-of-saliency led to a negative impact on affect, while saliency maintained positive affect, suggesting its helpfulness. Participants reported that it was easier to focus in the salient condition, although there was no significant improvement in the focused attention scale rating. Finally, this study suggests user interest in the topic is a good predictor of focused attention, which in turn is a good predictor of positive affect. These results suggest that enhancing saliency of user-interested topics seems a good strategy for boosting user engagement.
- Arapakis, J. M. Jose & P. D. Gray. Affective feedback: An investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process. In Proc. SIGIR2008, ACM press (2008), 395--402. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. Attfield, G. Kazai, M. Lalmas & B. Piwowarski. Towards a science of user engagement (Position Paper), WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications (2011).Google Scholar
- M. Banerjee, M. Capozzoli, L. McSweeney, & D. Sinha. Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 1 (1999).Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Carmi & L. Itti. Visual causes versus correlates of attentional selection in dynamic scenes. Vision Research, 46, 26 (2006).Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Gwizdka & I. Lopatovska. The role of subjective factors in the information search process. JASIST, 60, 12 (2009). Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. H. Huang. Designing website attributes to induce experiential encounters. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 4 (2003).Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 10--12 (2000), 1489--1506.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Jennings. Theory and models for creating engaging and immersive e-commerce websites. In Proc. SIGCPR 2000, ACM Press (2000). Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Jennett, A. L. Cox, P. Cairns, S. Dhoparee, A. Epps, T. Tijs & A. Walton. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 66, 9 (2008), 641--661. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Kittur, E. H. Chi & B. Suh. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proc. SIGCHI 2008, ACM Press (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Lopatovska. Searching for good mood: Examining relationships between search task and mood. American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46, 1 (2009), 1--13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. C. Marshall & F. M. Shipman. The ownership and reuse of visual media. In Proc. JCDL 2011, ACM Press (2011). Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Mason & S. Suri. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods (2010), 1--23.Google Scholar
- V. Navalpakkam & L. Itti. Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 4 (2007), 605--617.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. P. Novak, D. L. Hoffman, & Y. Yiu-Fai. Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. Marketing Science, 19, 1 (2000), 22--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. L. O'Brien. Defining and Measuring Engagement in User Experiences with Technology. PhD Thesis, 2008.Google Scholar
- H. L. O'Brien. Exploring user engagement in online news interactions. In Proc. ASIST 2011 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
- H. O'Brien & E. Toms. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. JASIST 61, 1 (2010). Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Pace. A grounded theory of the flow experiences of Web users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 3 (2004), 327--363. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Purcell, L. Rainie, A. Mitchell, T. Rosenstiel, & K. Olmstead. Understanding the Participatory News Consumer. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2010).Google Scholar
- K. Overbeeke, T. Djajadiningrat, C. Hummels, S. Wensveen & J. Frens. Let's make things engaging. Funology. Kluwer, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Peters & L. Itti. Applying computational tools to predict gaze direction in interactive visual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 5, 2 (2008). Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. G. Tabachnick & L. S. Fidell. Using Multivariate Statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.Google Scholar
- A. Treisman & G. Gelade. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 1 (1980).Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Watson, L. A. Clark & A. Tellegen. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (1988).Google Scholar
- J. Wolfe & T. Horowitz. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 6 (2004), 495--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- On saliency, affect and focused attention
Recommendations
Mesh saliency
Research over the last decade has built a solid mathematical foundation for representation and analysis of 3D meshes in graphics and geometric modeling. Much of this work however does not explicitly incorporate models of low-level human visual ...
Mesh saliency
SIGGRAPH '05: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 PapersResearch over the last decade has built a solid mathematical foundation for representation and analysis of 3D meshes in graphics and geometric modeling. Much of this work however does not explicitly incorporate models of low-level human visual ...
Saliency in motion: selective rendering of dynamic virtual environments
SCCG '09: Proceedings of the 25th Spring Conference on Computer GraphicsA major obstacle for real-time rendering of high-fidelity graphics is computational complexity. A key point to consider in the pursuit of "realism in real-time" in computer graphics is that the Human Visual System (HVS) is a fundamental part of the ...
Comments