skip to main content
10.1145/1978942.1979092acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved

Published:07 May 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Increasingly, systems are being developed and used in ways that involve end of life issues such as death, dying, and bereavement. Yet design considerations and guidelines for technologists working in this sensitive area are not well-established. We therefore report on exploratory fieldwork consisting of focus groups, observations, and consultation with bereavement experts aimed at understanding how technology might be designed to support bereaved parents. From this fieldwork, we derive a set of considerations useful for researchers and designers developing systems that deal specifically with bereavement, and with the end of life more broadly. These considerations focus on interpersonal communication, new ways of being in the world, and materiality. We conclude with a distillation of these considerations into practical design guidelines for working in this area.

References

  1. MyWonderfulLife. https://www.mywonderfullife.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Legacy Locker. http://legacylocker.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Entrustet. https://www.entrustet.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Forever Missed. http://www.forevermissed.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. MADD MN - Mothers Against Drunk Driving, Minnesota. http://www.maddmn.org/programs_quilt.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Aho, A.L., Tarkka, M., Astedt-Kurki, P., and Kaunonen, M. Fathers' Experience of Social Support After the Death of a Child. American Journal of Men's Health 3, 2 (2009), 93--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bartalos, M. K. Speaking of Death: America's New Sense of Mortality. Praeger, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, E. The Denial of Death. Simon and Schuster, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Buckle, J. L. and Fleming, S. Parenting after the Death of a Child: A Practitioner's Guide. Routledge, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidowitz, M. and Myrick, R. D. Responding to the bereaved: An analysis of "helping" statements. Death Education 8, 1 (1984), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dimond, J. P., Poole, E. S., and Yardi, S. The effects of life disruptions on home technology routines. Proc. GROUP 2010, ACM (2010), 85--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Freud, S. Mourning and melancholia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 56, 5 (1922), 543--545.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Friedman, B. and Nathan, L. P. Multi-lifespan information system design: a research initiative for the hci community. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 2243--2246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. Awareness of Dying. Aldine Transaction, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hallam, E. and Hockey, J. Death, Memory and Material Culture. Berg Publishers, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Helmes, J., Cao, X., Lindley, S. E., and Sellen, A. Developing the story: designing an interactive storytelling application. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, ACM (2009), 49--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Höök, K., Ståhl, A., Sundström, P., and Laaksolaahti, J. Interactional empowerment. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 647--656. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Howarth, G. Death and Dying: A Sociological Introduction. Polity, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaunonen, M., Tarkka, M., Paunonen, M., and Laippala, P. Grief and social support after the death of a spouse. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, 6 (1999), 1304--1311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Kirk, D. and Banks, R. On the design of technology heirlooms. International Workshop on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies 2008, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirk, D. S. and Sellen, A. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 17, 3 (2010), 1--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Klass. Continuing Bonds: New Understandings Of Grief. Taylor & Francis, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, T. L. and Doka, K. J. Men Don't Cry - Women Do: Transcending Gender Stereotypes of Grief. Psychology Press, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Massimi, M. and Baecker, R. M. A death in the family: opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 1821--1830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Massimi, M. and Charise, A. Dying, death, and mortality: towards thanatosensitivity in HCI. Proc. CHI 2009 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2009), 2459--2468. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Massimi, M., Odom, W., Kirk, D., and Banks, R. HCI at the end of life: understanding death, dying, and the digital. Proc. CHI 2010 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2010), 4477--4480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Moncur, W. Providing affective information to family and friends based on social networks. Proc. CHI 2007 Extended Abstracts, ACM (2007), 2219--2224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nadeau, J. W. Meaning-Making in Bereaved Families: Assessment, Intervention, and Future Research. In Handbook of Bereavement Research and Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention. American Psychological Association (APA), 2008, 511--530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., and Banks, R. Passing on & putting to rest: understanding bereavement in the context of interactive technologies. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 1831--1840. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Oliveri, T. Grief groups on the internet. Bereavement Care 22, 3 (2003), 39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Schwab, R. A child's death and divorce: Dispelling the myth. Death Studies 22, 5 (1998), 445--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Stone, L. D. and Pennebaker, J. W. Trauma in Real Time: Talking and Avoiding Online Conversations About the Death of Princess Diana. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24, 3 (2002), 173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Stroebe, M. S. Coping with bereavement: A review of the grief work hypothesis. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 26, 1 (1992), 19--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Sudnow, D. Passing on: The Social Organization of Dying. Prentice Hall, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Uriu, D. and Okude, N. ThanatoFenestra: photographic family altar supporting a ritual to pray for the deceased. Proc. DIS 2010, ACM (2010), 422--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Vale-Taylor, P. "We will remember them": a mixed-method study to explore which post-funeral remembrance activities are most significant and important to bereaved people living with loss, and why those particular activities are chosen. Palliative Medicine, (2009), 537--544 vol. 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Van den Hoven, E., Smeenk, W., Bilsen, H., Zimmerman, R., de Waart, S., and van Turnhout, K. Communicating commemoration. International Workshop on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies 2008, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Volkan, V. D. The Linking Objects of Pathological Mourners. Arch Gen Psychiatry 27, 2 (1972), 215--221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Worden, J. W. Grief Counseling and Grief Therapy: A Handbook for the Mental Health Practitioner. Springer Publishing Co., Inc., 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Wortham, J. As Older Users Join Facebook, Network Grapples With Death. The New York Times, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/technology/18death.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. Empathy and experience in HCI. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 637--646. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wyche, S. P., Magnus, C. M., and Grinter, R. E. Broadening Ubicomp's vision: an exploratory study of charismatic pentecostals and technology use in Brazil. Proc. UBICOMP 2009, ACM (2009), 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Dealing with death in design: developing systems for the bereaved
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2011
      3530 pages
      ISBN:9781450302289
      DOI:10.1145/1978942

      Copyright © 2011 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2011

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '11 Paper Acceptance Rate410of1,532submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader