skip to main content
research-article

Unpacking the television: User practices around a changing technology

Published:24 September 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article investigates the changing television watching practices amongst early adopters of personal hard-disk video recorders (such as Tivo) and Internet downloading of video. Through in-depth interviews with 21 video enthusiasts, we describe how the rhythms of television watching change when decoupled from broadcast TV schedules. Devices such as Tivo do not simply replace videotapes; TV watching becomes more active as programs are gathered from the schedules, played from a stored collection and fast forwarded and paused during playback. Downloads users exploit the Internet to view shows and movies not broadcast, yet this watching is not fundamentally different from recording shows using a PVR, since both involve selection of shows from a limited range and a wait before the shows can be watched.

References

  1. Andrade, N., Mowbray, M., Lima, A., Wagner, G., and Ripeanu, M. 2005. Influences on cooperation in BitTorrent communities. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Economics of Peer-To-Peer Systems. ACM Press, New York, 111--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Belk, R. 1995. Collecting in a Consumer Society. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G., Blythe, M., and Sengers, P. 2005. Making by making strange: Defamiliarization and the design of domestic technologies. ACM Trans. Computut.-Hum. Interact. 12, 2, 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Blythe, M., Monk, A., and Park, J. 2002. Technology biographies: Field study techniques for home use product development. In CHI '02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 658--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Blythe, M., Park, J., and Monk, A. 2004. Tele-Biographies: Data collection techniques to capture the ways people interact with digital TV. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 1560. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brown, B., Geelhoed, E., and Sellen, A. 2001. Music sharing as a computer supported collaborative application. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer, 179--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dickinson, R., Harindranath, R. O., and Linné, Eds. 1998. Approaches to Audiences -- A Reader. Arnold, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Drucker, S., Glatzer, A., De Mar, S., and Wong, C. 2002. SmartSkip: Consumer level browsing and skipping of digital video content. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 219--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ducheneaut, N. and Moore, R. J. 2004. The social side of gaming: A study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, New York, 360--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Forlizzi, J. and DiSalvo, C. 2006. Service robots in the domestic environment: A study of the roomba vacuum in the home. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM Press, New York, 258--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gauntlett, D. 1998. Ten things wrong with the “effects model”. In Approaches to Audiences -- A Reader. R. Dickinson et al., Eds. Arnold, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gauntlett, D. and Hill, A. 1999. TV Living: Television, Culture and Everyday Life. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hughes, J., O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., and Viller, S. 2000. Patterns of home life: Informing design for domestic environments. Personal Ubiquit. Comput. 4, 1, 25--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, S. 2005. Watching TV makes you smarter. New York Times Mag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kubey, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990.Television and the Quality of Life: How Viewing Shapes Everyday Experience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kubey, R. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2002.Television addiction is no mere metaphor. Sci. Amer. 286, 74--80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Kwok, S. H. 2004. File sharing activities over BT Networks: Pirated movies. Comput. Entertain. 2, 2, 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., and Lofland, L., Eds. 2005. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieb, K. 2005. Can the television and movie industries avoid the copyright battles of the recording industry? Fair use and visual works on the Internet. J. Law Policy 17, 233--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Madden, M. and Rainie, L. 2005. Music and video downloading. Pew Internet and American Life Project. March 23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Milavsky, J. R., Kessler, R. C., Stipp, H., and Rubens, W. S. 1982. Television and Aggression: A Panel Study. Academic Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, D. 1998. The Theory of Shopping. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., and Hughes, J. 1999. At home with the technology: An ethnographic study of a set-top-box trial. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 6, 282--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. OffCom. 2006. The communications market: Digital progress report. Digital TV Q1 2006. http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/tv/reports/dtv/dtu_2006_q1/dtu_2006_q1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. O'Hara, K. and Brown, B., Eds. 2005. Consuming Music Together: Social and Collaborative Aspects of Music Consumption Technologies. Springer, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Oehlberg, L., Ducheneaut, N., Thornton, J. D., Moore, R. J., and Nickell, E. 2006. Social TV: Designing for distributed, sociable television viewing. In Proceedings of the EuroITV Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rode, J. A., Toye, E. F., and Blackwell, A. F. 2005. The domestic economy: A broader unit of analysis for end user programming. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 1757--1760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sen, S. and Wang, J. 2004. Analyzing peer-to-peer traffic across large networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 12, 2, 219--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Singel, R. 2008. Internet mysteries: How much file sharing traffic travels the net? Wired, May 5. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/05/how-much-file-s/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and Everyday Life. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, A. S. and Harper, R. 2003. Switching on to switch off. In Inside the Smart Home, R. Harper et al., Eds. Springer Verlag, London, 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, A. S. and Swan, L. 2005. Artful systems in the home. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 641--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. U.S. Department of Labor. 2006. American time use survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/atus.nr0.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Voida, A., Grinter, R. E., Ducheneaut, N., Edwards, W. K., and Newman, M. W. 2005. Listening in: Practices surrounding iTunes music sharing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York, 191--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Wood, L. and Skrebowski, L. 2004. The future's here; It's just unevenly distributed. Interactions, ACM Press, New York, 76--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Unpacking the television: User practices around a changing technology

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
              ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 16, Issue 3
              September 2009
              121 pages
              ISSN:1073-0516
              EISSN:1557-7325
              DOI:10.1145/1592440
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 24 September 2009
              • Accepted: 1 March 2009
              • Revised: 1 November 2007
              • Received: 1 January 2006
              Published in tochi Volume 16, Issue 3

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader