skip to main content
10.1145/2745197.2745208acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Broadcast, Video-on-Demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content: A Household Perspective

Published:03 June 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an explorative investigation into households? uses of traditional broadcast television (TV) and more recently introduced video-on-demand (VoD) services. More specifically, we explain how each way of viewing TV and video content relates to different viewing situations in the home. We conducted in-home interviews with seven households in The Netherlands in order to obtain rich data that are required for understanding these phenomena. Our results elaborate on the uses of watching broadcast TV, catch-up services, and video-on-demand streaming services, the recording of content, and the downloading of content. While the traditional broadcast model is on the decline to some extent, our data still revealed essential uses of broadcast concerning certain types of content and specific viewing situations. Based on the results, a number of implications for the design of recommender systems and interfaces, service providers and broadcasters, and TV manufacturers are presented.

References

  1. Abreu, J., Almeida, P., and Teles, B. TV Discovery & Enjoy: A New Approach to Help Users Finding the Right TV Program to Watch. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, ACM (2014), 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Abreu, J., Almeida, P., Teles, B., and Reis, M. Viewer Behaviors and Practices in the (New) Television Environment. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, ACM (2013), 5--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Barkhuus, L. and Brown, B. Unpacking the television: User practices around a changing technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 16, 3 (2009), 15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brodesser-Akner, T. Life Without Cable TV? Not Such a Tragedy. The New York Times, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/25/arts/television/life -without-cable-tv-not-such-a-tragedy.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cain Miller, C. YouTube Tries to Become More Like TV. Bits Blog, 2012. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/YouTubetries-to-become-more-like-tv/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaney, A. J. B., Gartrell, M., Hofman, J. M., Guiver, J., Koenigstein, N., Kohli, P., & Paquet, U. (2014). A Large-scale Exploration of Group Viewing Patterns. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 31--38). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2602299.2602309 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Churchill, E. Putting the person back into personalization. Interactions 20, 5 (2013), 12--15. New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2504847 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Clover, J. Counting Netflix by country. Broadband TV News. http://www.broadbandtvnews.com/2014/07/24/countin g-netflix-by-country/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Geerts, D., Cesar, P., and Bulterman, D. The implications of program genres for the design of social television systems. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video, ACM (2008), 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Honan, M. No One Uses Smart TV Internet Because It Sucks | Gadget Lab | Wired.com. Gadget Lab. http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/12/internet-tvsucks/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kujala, S., Vogel, M., Pohlmeyer, A.E., and Obrist, M. Lost in Time: The Meaning of Temporal Aspects in User Experience. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2013), 559--564. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., and Newell, C. Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4--5 (2012), 441--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Masthoff, J. Group Modeling: Selecting a Sequence of Television Items to Suit a Group of Viewers. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14, 1 (2004), 37--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mercer, K., May, A., and Mitchel, V. Designing for video: investigating the contextual cues within viewing situations. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 723--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Netflix near 1 mln subscribers in Netherlands. telecompaper. 15 February, 2015. http://www.telecompaper.com/news/netflix-near-1mln-subscribers-in-netherlands--1065387.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Saxbe, D., Graesch, A., and Alvik, M. Television as a Social or Solo Activity: Understanding Families? Everyday Television Viewing Patterns. Communication Research Reports 28, 2 (2011), 180--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., and Hill, A. Investigating media use and the television user experience in the home. Entertainment Computing 2, 3 (2011), 151--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Vanattenhoven, J. and Geerts, D. Contextual aspects of typical viewing situations - a new perspective for recommending television and video content. Conditionally accepted for Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Special Issue: Interactive Experiences for Television and Online Video (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Broadcast, Video-on-Demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content: A Household Perspective

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TVX '15: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video
      June 2015
      230 pages
      ISBN:9781450335263
      DOI:10.1145/2745197

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TVX '15 Paper Acceptance Rate12of50submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate69of245submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      IMX '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader