skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518961acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive information search: age-dependent interactions between cognitive profiles and strategies

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that older adults performed worse in web search tasks, and attributed poorer performance to a decline in their cognitive abilities. We conducted a study involving younger and older adults to compare their web search behavior and performance in ill-defined and well-defined information tasks using a health information website. In ill-defined tasks, only a general description about information needs was given, while in well-defined tasks, information needs as well as the specific target information were given. We found that older adults performed worse than younger adults in well-defined tasks, but the reverse was true in ill-defined tasks. Older adults compensated for their lower cognitive abilities by adopting a top-down knowledge-driven strategy to achieve the same level of performance in the ill-defined tasks. Indeed, path models showed that cognitive abilities, health literacy, and knowledge influenced search strategies adopted by older and younger adults. Design implications are also discussed.

References

  1. Baker, D.W., M.V. Williams, R.M. Parker, J.A. Gazmararian, and J. Nurss, Development of a Brief Test to Measure Functional Health Literacy. Patient Education and Counseling, (1999), 38, 33--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bass, S.B., How Will Internet Use Affect the Patient? A Review of Computer Network and Closed Internet-Based System Studies and the Implications in Understanding How the Use of the Internet Affects Patient Populations. Journal of Health Psychology, (2003), 8, 25--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brumby, D.P. and A. Howes, Strategies for Guiding Interactive Search: An Empirical Investigation into the Consequences of Label Relevance for Assessment and Selection. Human-Computer Interaction, (2008), 23, 1--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, J., P. Cohen, W. S., and L.S. Aiken, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2003, New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Corsi, P.M., Human Memory and the Medial Temporal Region of the Brain. Dissertation Abstracts International, (1972), 34, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Czaja, S.J., N. Charness, A. Fisk, C. Hertzog, S. Nari, W. Rogers, and J. Sharit, Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings from the Center for Research Andeducation on Aging and Technology Enhancement (Create). Psych Aging, (2006), 21, 333--352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Czaja, S.J. and C.C. Lee, The Internet and Older Adults: Design Challenges and Opportunities, in Communication, Technology and Aging, N. Charness, D.C. Parks, and B.A. Sabel, Editors. 2001, Springer: New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Czaja, S.J., J. Sharit, R. Ownby, D. Roth, and S. Nair, Examining Age Differences in Performance of a Complex Information Search and Retrieval Task. Psych Aging, (2001), 16, 564--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Davis, T.C., S.W. Long, R.H. Jackson, E.J. Mayeaux, and R.B. George, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine: A Shortened Screening Instrument. Family Medicine, (1993), 25, 391--395.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekstrom, R.B., J.W. French, H.H. Harmon, and Dermen, Manual for the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. 1976, Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairweather, P. How Older and Younger Adults Differ in Their Approach to Problem Solving on a Complex Website. in Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility. (2008). Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fisk, A.D., W.A. Rogers, N. Charness, S.J. Czaja, and J. Sharit, Designing for Older Adults-Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. 2004, Washington, D. C.: CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox, S. Online Health Search 2006. 2006 {cited 2008 September, 15}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gazmararian, J.A., M.V. Williams, J. Peel, and D.W. Baker, Health Literacy and Knowledge of Chronic Disease. Patient education and counseling, (2003), 51, 267--275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lavie, N., Perceptual Load as a Necessary Condition for Selective Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, (1995), 21, 3 451--468.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. McLeod, D.R., R.R. Griffiths, G.E. Bigelow, and J. Yingling, An Automated Version of the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (Dsst). Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,&Computers, (1982), 14, 463--466.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ratzan, S.C. and R.M. Parker, Introduction, in National Library of Medicine Current Bibliographies in Medicine: Health Literacy, C.R. Selden, et al., Editors. 2000, National Institute of Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services: Bethesda, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Salthouse, T.A., Mediation of Adult Age Differences in Cognition by Reductions in Working Memory and Speed of Processing. Psychological Science, (1991), 2, 179--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sharit, J., S. Czaja, M. Hernadez, Y. Yang, D. Perdomo, J. Lewis, C. Lee, and S. Nair, An Evaluation of Performance by Older Persons on a Simulated Telecommuting Task. Journal of Gerontology:Psychological Science, (2004), 59B, 305--316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharit, J., M. Hernandez, S. Czaja, and P. Pirolli, Investigating the Roles of Knowledge and Cognitive Abilities in Older Adult Information Seeking on the Web. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, (2008), 15, 11--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Simon, H.A., The Structure of Ill-Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, (1973), 4, 181--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stine-Morrow, E.A.L., L.M.S. Miller, D.D. Gagne, and C. Hertzog, Self-Regulated Reading in Adulthood. Psychology and Aging, (2008), 23, 1, 131--153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sutcliffe, A. and M. Ennis, Towards a Cognitive Theory of Information Retrieval. Interacting with computers, (1998), 10, 321--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Unsworth, N., R. Heitz, J. Schrock, and R. Engle, An Automated Version of the Operation Span Task. Behavior Research Methods, (2005), 37, 498--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive information search: age-dependent interactions between cognitive profiles and strategies

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              April 2009
              2426 pages
              ISBN:9781605582467
              DOI:10.1145/1518701

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 4 April 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader