skip to main content
research-article

Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms

Published:11 December 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

A variety of approaches have emerged in HCI that grapple with the ineffable, ill-defined, and idiosyncratic nature of aesthetic experience. The most straightforward approach is to transform the ineffable aspects of these experiences into precise representations, producing systems that are well-defined and testable but may miss the fullness of the experienced phenomenon. But without formal models and codified methods, how can we design and evaluate for a phenomenon we aren't sure can be adequately captured? In this article, we present a case study of a system for reflection and awareness of emotional presence that was, in a sense, lived into being. Through system design, use, and evaluation we recount how the system evolved into something that enhanced rather than impoverished the sympathetic awareness of another. In discussing the strategies and results of the case study, we examine what it means for the HCI community to not only design for aesthetic experiences but also bring aesthetics into the practice of HCI.

References

  1. Angesleva, J., Reynolds, C., and O'Modhrain, S. 2004. Emotemail. Poster presented at 31st International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH) (Los Angeles, CA). ACM Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bannon, L. and Bødker, S. 1991. Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use. In Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface, J. Carroll (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 227--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bødker, S. 1998. Understanding representation in design. Hum. Comput. Inter. 13, 2, 107--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Boehner, K., DePaulo, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. 2005. Affect: From Information to Interaction. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Critical Computing (Aarhus, Denmark), O. Bertlesen et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 59--68. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Boehner, K., Depaulo, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. 2007a. How Emotion is Made and Measured. Inter. J. Hum. Comput. Studies 65, 4, 275--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P., and Dourish, P. 2007b. How HCI Interprets the Probes. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA), B. Begole et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 1077--1086. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brooks, R. A. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47, 139--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X., and Ishii, H. 2001. LumiTouch: An emotional communication device. In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, WA), J. Jacko and A. Sears (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 313--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Day, R. 2000. The conduit metaphor and the nature and politics of information studies. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. 51, 9, 805--811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. Minton, Balch and Company, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dey, A. K. and De Guzman, E. 2006. From awareness to connectedness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada), R. Grinter et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dourish, P. and Bly, S. 1992. Portholes. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (Monterey, CA), P. Bauersfeld (Eds.). ACM Press, 541--547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada), R. Grinter et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dunne, A, and Raby, F. 1994. Fields and Thresholds. Presented at Doors of Perception. http://www.mediamatic.nl/Doors/Doors2/DunRab/DunRab-Doors2-E3.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunne, A. and Raby, F. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Objects. Birhauser, Basel, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Fallman, D. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, FL). G. Cockton and P. Korhonen (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 225--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Fishwick, P. 2006. Aesthetic Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gaver, W. 2001. Designing for ludic aspects of everyday life. ERCIM News 47, 20--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. 2003. Ambiguity as a resource for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, FL), G. Cockton and P. Korhonen (Eds.). ACM Press, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Heidegger, M. 1990. Being and time, John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson, (trans). In The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur, Gayle L. Ormiston and Alan D. Schrift (Eds.). State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hume, D. 1740. A Treatise of Human Nature (1967, edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kant, I. 1952. Critique of Judgement. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Karahalios, K. and Donath, J. 2004. Telemurals. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria), E. Dykstra-erickson and M. Tscheligi (Eds.). ACM Press, 615--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kolko, J. 2007. Thoughts on Interaction Design. Brown Bear LLC, Savannah, GA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy, J. and Wright, P. 2004. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. McCarthy, J, Wright, P, Wallace, J., and Dearden, A. 2006. The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 10, 6, 369--378. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mitchell, W., Inouye, A., and Blumenthal, M. 2001. Beyond Productivity: information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nake, F. and Grabowski, S. 2006. The interface as sign and as aesthetic event. In Aesthetic Computing, P., Fishwick (Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 53--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pederson, E. R. and Sokoler, T. 1997. AROMA. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. Pemberton (Ed.). ACM Press, Atlanta, GA, 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Peters, J. D. 1986. Speaking into the Air. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Picard, R. 1997. Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Pold, S. 2005. The Critical Interface. In Proceedings of 4th Decennial Critical Computing (Aarhus, Denmark), O. Bertlesen et al. (Eds). ACM Press, New York, NY, 109--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., Mateas, M., and Gay, G., 2008. The disenchantment of affect. Journal of Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 5, 347--358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sengers, P. and Csikszentmihályi, C. 2003. HCI and the arts: conflicted convergence? In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, FL), G. Cockton and P. Korhonen (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 876--877. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sengers, P. and Gaver, W. 2006. Staying open to interpretation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA), J. Carroll et al. (Eds). ACM Press, New York, NY, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sengers, P., Liesendahl, R., Magar, W., Seibert, C., M¨uller, B., Joachims, T., Geng, W., Mårtensson, P., and Höök, K. 2002. The enigmatics of affect. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (London, England), B. Verplank et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 87--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shepherd, G. J. 2006. Communication as transcendence. In, Communication as…, G. J. Shepherd et al. (Eds). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 22--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Suchman, L. 1993. Plans and Situated Actions. University of Cambridge Press, Cambridge, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sundström, P., Ståhl, A., and Höök, K. 2005. eMoto: affectively involving both body and mind. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR), W. Kellogg et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY, 2005--2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Tatar, D. 2007. The design tensions framework. Hum.-Comput. Inter., 22, 4, 413--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Wilson, S. 2002. Information Arts: Intersections of Art, Science, and Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Winograd, T. and Flores, F. 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Wolf, T., Rode, J., Sussman, J., and Kellogg, K. 2006. Dispelling ‘design’ as the black art of CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada), R. Grinter et al. (Eds.). ACM Press, New York, NY 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
      ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 15, Issue 3
      November 2008
      94 pages
      ISSN:1073-0516
      EISSN:1557-7325
      DOI:10.1145/1453152
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 December 2008
      • Revised: 1 January 2008
      • Accepted: 1 January 2008
      • Received: 1 March 2007
      Published in tochi Volume 15, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader