skip to main content
10.1145/778712.778728acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The enigmatics of affect

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Affective computation generally focuses on the informatics of affect: structuring, formalizing, and representing emotion as informational units. We propose instead an enigmatics of affect, a critical technical practice that respects the rich and undefinable complexities of human affective experience. Our interactive installation, the Influencing Machine, allows users to explore a dynamic landscape of emotionally expressive sound and child-like drawings, using a tangible, intuitive input device that supports open-ended engagement. The Influencing Machine bridges the subjective experience of the user and the necessary objective rationality of the underlying code. It functions as a cultural probe, reflecting and challenging users to reflect on the cultural meaning of affective computation.

References

  1. Agre, P. Computation and Human Experience. Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ark, W., Dryer, D., and Lu, D. The emotion mouse. Proceedings of HCI International 1999. Munich, Germany (August 1999). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bates, J. The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun. ACM, Special issue on Agents, 37, 7 (July 1994), 122--125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bettelheim, B. The Empty Fortress: Infantile Autism and the Birth of the Self. Free Press, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumberg, B. Action-selection in Hamsterdam: Lessons from ethology, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (Brighton, 1994). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blumberg, B. Old Tricks, New Dogs: Ethology and Interactive Creatures. PhD thesis, MIT Media Lab, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brooks, R. A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2, 7 (April 1986), 14--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brooks, R. A. Intelligence without reason, in Proceedings of IJCAI-91 (Sydney, Australia, August 1991), 569--595.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooks, R. Integrated systems based on behaviors, in Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Integrated Intelligent Architectures, Stanford University (March 1991). Also available in SIGART Bulletin, 2, 4 (August 1991). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Burton, E. Artificial innocence: Interactions between the study of children's drawing and Artificial Intelligence. Leonardo. 30, 4 (1997), 301--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Burton, E. Representing representation: Artificial Intelligence and drawing. Computers & Art. Intellect Ltd,. Exeter, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, H. The further exploits of AARON, painter Stanford Electronic Humanities Review, Special Issue on Constructions of the Mind, 4, 2 (1995). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Damasio, A. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Gosset Putnam, New York, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dodge, C. The Bed: A Medium for Intimate Communication., in Proceedings of CHI '97 (Short papers). http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/short-talk/cd.htm. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Fernandez, R., Scheirer, J. and Picard, R. Expression glasses: a wearable device for facial expression recognition. MIT Media Lab Tech. Rep. 484, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaver, B, Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Cultural probes, interactions 6, 1 (Jan-Feb 1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Heller, E. Wie Farben Wirken: Farbpsychologie, Farbsymbolik, Kreative Farbgestaltung, Rowohlt Verlag, Reibek bei Hamburg, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffman, E.T.A. Der Sandmann. Der Sandmann Das Öde Haus. Reclam, Stuttgart, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kellogg, R. Analyzing Children's Art. Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, CA, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Liesendahl, R. Andenken an Einzelnes, José-Luis de Delás, Musikkonzepte 78, ed. H.-K. Metzger, Munich, Germany, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Loyall, A. B. Believable Agents: Building Interactive Personafities. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Computer Science, 1997, CMU-CS-97-123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Maes, P. The dynamics of action-selection. In Proceedings of IJCAI-89. Detroit, MI: Morgan Kauffman (August 1989), vol. 2, 991--997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Maes, 19 How to do the right thing. Connection Science Journal, 1, 3 (1989), 291--323, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Mateas, M. Expressive AI. SIGGraph 2000 Electronic Arts and Animation Catalog (New Orleans).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. McCorduck, P. AARON's Code: Meta-Art, Artificial Intelligence, and the Work of Harold Cohen, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Neal Reilly, W. S. Believable Social and Emotional Agents. PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Computer Science, 1996, CMU-CS-96-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ortony, A., Clore, G.L. and Collins, A. The cognitive structure of emotions, Cambridge University Press, N.Y, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearson, D., Huffman, S., Willis, M., Laird, J., and Jones, R. Intelligent multi-level control in a highly reactive domain, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (Pittsburgh, PA, 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Penny, S. Agents as artwork and agent design as artistic practice, in Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, ed. Kerstin Dautenhahn, John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Picard, R. Affective Computing, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Richter, H,.-G. Die Kinderzeichnung: Entwicklung, Interpretation, Ästhetik. Cornelsen, Berlin 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Scheirer, J., and Picard, R. Affective Objects. MIT Media Lab Technical report, n°524.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sengers, IR Designing comprehensible agents, in Proceedings of IJCAI-99 (Stockholm, Sweden). Morgan Kaufmann, Vol. 2, 1227--1232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Stone, B. A. Dynamically sequencing an animated pedagogical agent, Proceedings of AAAI-96, Portland, OR, 424--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Strauss, M. Von der Zeichensprache des kleinen Kindes: Spuren der Menschwerdung. Verlag Freies Geistesleben, Stuttgart, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tausk, V. The influencing machine, in Incorporations, ed. J. Crary and S. Kwinter. Zone Books, New York 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The enigmatics of affect

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader