ABSTRACT
In this paper we describe an experiment, in which we examined older and younger adults when interacting with a simulated PDA (personal digital assistant). Independent variables were users' age (young vs. older) and device interface (hyperlink vs. no hyperlink). Dependent variables were the effectiveness and efficiency of menu navigation. To understand how user characteristics influence performance, spatial ability, verbal memory, computer expertise and technical self-confidence were determined. Technology experienced young and older adults (benchmark testing) took part. They had to solve four tasks either with hyperlink interface or without hyperlinks in the interface. The method to collect, to automatically analyze and to structure the data according to interaction sequences and presumed user intentions is a novel approach supported by the open source software tool Clever [12]. The tool is briefly described; more details can be found in [23]. Results revealed that hyperlink interfaces showed overall higher effectiveness. However, the impact of hyperlinks for efficiency was age-related. Younger adults strongly benefit from having hyperlinks. The contrary was the case for older adults, who showed higher menu disorientation when using hyperlinks.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Slides from the presentation
Supplemental material for 'How younger and older adults master the usage of hyperlinks in small screen devices'
- Arning, K. & Ziefle, M. Barriers of information access in small screen device applications: The relevance of user characteristics for a trans-generational design. In: User Interfaces for all. LNCS (2006), Berlin, Germany, Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arning, K. & Ziefle, M. Understanding age differences in PDA acceptance and performance. Computers in Human Behaviour (in press). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bay, S. & Ziefle, M. Design for all: User characteristics to be considered for the design of devices with hierarchical menu structures, In Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management, H. Luczak and K.J. Zink (Eds.), IEA Press, Santa Monica, (2003), 503--508.Google Scholar
- Beier, G. Kontrollüberzeugungen im Umgang mit Technik {Locus of control when interacting with technology}, Report Psychologie, 24, (1999), 684--693.Google Scholar
- Busch, T. Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, (1995), 147--158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Craik, F.I. and Salthouse, T.A. Handbook of Aging and Cognition. Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992.Google Scholar
- Czaja, S. J. & Sharit, J. Age differences in the Performance of Computer-based work. Psychology and Aging, 8, (1993), 59--67.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Downing, R.W.; Moore, J.L. & Brown, S.W. The effects and interaction of spatial visualization and domain expertise on information seeking. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21, (2005),195--209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ekstrom, R.B.; French, J.W.; Harman, H.H. & Dermien, D. Manual for the Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Test. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, 1976.Google Scholar
- Goodman, J.; Gray, P.; Khammampad, K. & Brewster, S. Using landmarks to support older people in navigation. In S. Brewster & M. Dunlop (eds.). Mobile Human Computer Interaction. LNCS, (2004), 38--48. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hasher, L. & Zacks, R. Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G.H. Bower (Ed.). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 193--225. San Diego: Academic, 1988.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacareto. http://jacareto.sourceforge.net/Google Scholar
- Klaudt, D. & Spannagel, C. Computerunterstüütztes Operieren am mentalen Zahlenstrahl {computer supported learning to process mentally represented numbers}. Erziehung und Unterricht, 154 (3-4), (2004), 246--257.Google Scholar
- Kieras, D. & Polson P. G. An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, (1985), 365--394.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lin, D.M. Age differences in the performance of hypertext perusal. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica: Human Factors Society, (2001), 211--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morrow, D.; Miller, L.S.; Ridolfo, H.; Kokayeff, N.; Chang, D.; Fischer, U. & Stine-Morrow, E. Expertise and aging in a pilot decision making task. In Proceeding of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual meeting (2004), 228--232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PalmSource Inc. http://www.palmsource.comGoogle Scholar
- Park, D. & Schwarz, N. Cognitive Aging. Philadelphia: Buchenan, 1999.Google Scholar
- Parush, A. & Yuviler-Gavish, T. Web navigation structures in cellular phones. The depth-breadth trade-off issue. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, (2004), 753--770.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodger, J.A. & Pendakhar, P.C. A field study of the impact of gender and user's technical experience on the performance of voice-activated medical tracking application. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, (2004), 529--544.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schroeder, U. & Spannagel, C. The Role of Interaction Records in Active Learning Processes. In: P. Isaias, M. B. Nunes, & A. P. dos Reis (eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS Virtual Multi Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (2005), 99--104.Google Scholar
- Shiffler, G.; Smulders, C.; Correia, J.N.; Hale, JK. & Hahn, W. Gartner Dataquest Market Databook. Gartner Dataquest Inc, 2005.Google Scholar
- Spannagel, C., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Schroeder, U. Application of Qualitative Content Analysis in User-Program Interaction Research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), 2006, http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-05/05-2-29-e.htm.Google Scholar
- Spannagel, C. Qualitative und quantitative Analyse von Interaktionsaufzeichnungen {qualitative and quantitative analysis of interaction records}. Masterthesis, Technical University Darmstadt, Germany, 2003.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, U.: PTAH: validation driven software development. In: 5th International Conference on Integrated Design & Process Technology 2000, Dallas, Texas, Juni 2000.Google Scholar
- Schroeder, U. & Spannagel, C. Supporting the Active Learning Process, International Journal on E-Learning, 5, 2, (2006).Google Scholar
- Westermann, S.J. Individual differences in the use of command line and menu computer interfaces. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 9, (1995), 183--198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. Comparing Older and Younger Novice. In S. Brewster & M. Dunlop (eds.). Mobile Human Computer Interaction. LNCS, (2004), 25--37. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ziefle, M., & Bay, S. Mental Models of a Cellular Phone Menu. Comparing Older and Younger Novice. In S. Brewster & M. Dunlop (eds.). Mobile Human Computer Interaction. LNCS, (2004), 25--37. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ziefle, M.; & Bay, S. How to overcome disorientation in mobile phone menus: A comparison of two different types of navigation Aids, Human Computer Interaction, 21, (2006), 393--432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ziefle, M.; Arning, K. & Bay, S. Cross platform consistency and cognitive compatibility: the importance of users' mental model for the interaction with mobile devices. In K. Richter, J. Nichols, K. Gajos & A. Seffah (Eds.). CHI 2006 Workshop: The Many Faces of Consistency, MAFOC, 198, (2006) 75--81. http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-198/Google Scholar
- Ziefle, M.; Bay, S. & Schwade, A. On keys meanings and modes. The impact of navigation key solutions on children's efficiency using a mobile phone. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(5), (2006), 413--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- How younger and older adults master the usage of hyperlinks in small screen devices
Recommendations
How older and younger adults differ in their approach to problem solving on a complex website
Assets '08: Proceedings of the 10th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibilityOlder adults differ from younger ones in the ways they experience the World Wide Web. For example, they tend to move from page to page more slowly, take more time to complete tasks, make more repeated visits to pages, and take more time to select link ...
Home robotic devices for older adults: Opportunities and concerns
AbstractRobotic devices for older adults are becoming a reality. New robots are being introduced for the growing subpopulation of healthy older adults, with an emphasis on supporting the positive aspects of aging. In order to inform the design ...
Highlights- Older adults' attitudes and emotional reactions toward robotic devices were evaluated.
Understanding Older Adults' Perceptions of In-Home Sensors Using an Obtrusiveness Framework
Proceedings, Part II, of the 10th International Conference on Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience - Volume 9744The aim of this study was to determine if dimensions and sub-categories of a previously-tested obtrusiveness framework were represented in interviews conducted with community-dwelling older adults at three- and six-month study visits during an in-home ...
Comments