Corey Thomas Martin
ABSTRACT
Due to the subjective and complex nature of topics like fun and enjoyment, the motivations for players engaging with interactive games are particularly difficult to explore. However, understanding player motivation within games is indisputably valuable for those wishing to succeed in this highly competitive industry. While numerous models exist to quantify the motivations felt by players, the industry is ever evolving, and emerging sub industries have given rise to new reasons to play. In this work, though a meta-ethnography study clustering 284 motivation metaphors extracted from 30 included papers, the Spheres of Motivation is proposed; a new preliminary typology which synthesizes the last three decades of player motivation research.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Richard Bartle. 1996. Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research 1, 1 (1996), 19 pages.Google Scholar
- Chris Bateman and Lennart E. Nacke. 2010. The Neurobiology of Play. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (Futureplay ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920780Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus Bildtgard. 2014. Applying the Five Factor Model to Games. Thesis. Uppsala University.Google Scholar
- Elizabeth Boyle, Thomas M. Connolly, and Thomas Hainey. 2011. The Role of Psychology in Understanding the Impact of Computer Games. Entertainment Computing 2, 2 (2011), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2010.12.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological.American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chiao-Chen Chang. 2013. Examining users’ intention to continue using social network games: A flow experience perspective. Telematics and Informatics 30 (2013), 311–321.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kendra Cherry. 2021. How Does Self-Determination Theory Explain Motivation?https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-2795387Google Scholar
- Paul Costa and R.R. McCrae. 1999. A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. Handbook of personality: Theory and research 2 (01 1999), 51–87.Google Scholar
- Anders Drachen, Alessandro Canossa, and Georgios N. Yannakakis. 2009. Player Modeling using Self-Organization in Tomb Raider: Underworld. In 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games(CIG’09). IEEE, Milano, Italy, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2009.5286500Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emma France, Maggie Cunningham, Nicola Ring, Isa Uny, Edward Duncan, Ruth Jepson, Margaret Maxwell, Rachel Roberts, Ruth Turley, Andrew Booth, Nicky Britten, Kate Flemming, Ian Gallagher, Ruth Garside, Karin Hannes, Simon Lewin, George Noblit, Catherine Pope, James Thomas, and Jane Noyes. 2019. Improving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance. BMC Medical Research Methodology 19 (01 2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juho Hamari and Lauri Keronen. 2017. Why do people play games? A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information Management 37 (2017), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.01.006Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does Gamification Work? — A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, USA, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juho Hamari and Janne Tuunanen. 2014. Player Types: A Meta-synthesis. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association 1 (2014), 25. https://doi.org/10.26503/todigra.v1i2.13Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph Hilgard, Christopher R. Engelhardt, and Bruce D. Bartholow. 2013. Individual differences in motives, preferences, and pathology in video games: the gaming attitudes, motives, and experiences scales (GAMES). Frontiers in Psychology 4 (2013), 608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00608Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. AAAI Workshop - Technical Report 1 (2004), 6.Google Scholar
- Daniel Johnson, Sebastian Deterding, Kerri-Ann Kuhn, Aleksandra Staneva, Stoyan Stoyanov, and Leanne Hides. 2016. Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions 6(2016), 89–106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John A Johnson. 2014. Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality 51 (2014), 78–89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kirsi Pauliina Kallio, Frans Mäyrä, and Kirsikka Kaipainen. 2011. At Least Nine Ways to Play: Approaching Gamer Mentalities. Games and Culture 6, 4 (2011), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412010391089Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mehdi Kaytoue, Arlei Silva, Loïc Cerf, Wagner Meira Jr., and Chedy Raïssi. 2012. Watch me Playing, I am a Professional: a First Study on Video Game Live Streaming. In WWW ’12 Companion: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conference Committee, Lyon, France, 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187980.2188259Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stéphane Kieger. 2010. An Exploration of Entrepreneurship in Massively Multiplayer Online RolePlaying Games: Second Life® and Entropia Universe®. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research 2, 4 (2010), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v2i4.643Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicole Lazzaro. 2004. Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion in Player Experiences. In Game Developers Conference. XEODesign, Oakland, CA, 1–46.Google Scholar
- Thomas W Malone and Mark R Lepper. 1987. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, Book section 10, 223–253.Google Scholar
- Andrzej Marczewski. 2015. User Types HEXAD. Blurb, Inc., California, USA, 65–80.Google Scholar
- Marcel Martončik. 2015. e-Sports: Playing just for fun or playing to satisfy life goals?Computers in Human Behavior 48 (2015), 208–211.Google Scholar
- Abraham Harold Maslow. 1943. A theory of human motivation.Psychological review 50, 4 (1943), 370.Google Scholar
- Robert R. McCrae and Paul T. Costa. 1987. Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Across Instruments and Observers. Journal of personality and social psychology 52, 1(1987), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lennart E. Nacke, Chris Bateman, and Regan L. Mandryk. 2014. BrainHex: A Neurobiological Gamer Typology Survey. Entertainment Computing 5, 1 (2014), 55–62.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nintendo. 2019. Ring Fit Adventure.Google Scholar
- George W. Noblit and R. Dwight Hare. 1988. Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 11. Sage Publications, California. 88 pages.Google Scholar
- Jana Rambusch, Peter Jakobsson, and Daniel Pargman. 2007. Exploring E-sports: A Case Study of Gameplay in Counter-strike. In DiGRA ’07 - Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, Vol. 4. Digital Games Research Association, Tokyo, Japan, 157–164.Google Scholar
- Sonia Roccas, Lilach Sagiv, Shalom H. Schwartz, and Ariel Knafo. 2002. The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28, 6 (2002), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68–78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (2006), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Sherry, Bradley Greenberg, Kristen Lucas, and Kenneth Lachlan. 2006. Video Game Uses and Gratifications as Predictors of Use and Game Preference. In Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, Peter Vorderer and Jennings Bryant (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, Book section 15, 213–224.Google Scholar
- Christopher J. Soto, Anna Kronauer, and Josephine K. Liang. 2015. Five-Factor Model of Personality. American Cancer Society, West Sussex, UK, Chapter 1, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa014 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa014Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gustavo F. Tondello, Rina R. Wehbe, Lisa Diamond, Marc Busch, Andrzej Marczewski, and Lennart E. Nacke. 2016. The Gamification User Types Hexad Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI PLAY ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hui-Jie Tone, Hao-Rui Zhao, and Wan-Seng Yan. 2014. The attraction of online games: An important factor for Internet Addiction. Computers in Human Behavior 30 (2014), 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.017Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fan-Chen Tseng. 2011. Segmenting online gamers by motivation. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 6 (2011), 7693–7697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.142Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ubisoft. 2011. Rocksmith.Google Scholar
- Jukka Vahlo, Johanna K. Kaakinen, Suvi K. Holm, and Aki Koponen. 2017. Digital Game Dynamics Preferences and Player Types. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22, 2 (2017), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12181Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Vorderer, Tilo Hartmann, and Christoph Klimmt. 2003. Explaining the Enjoyment of Playing Video Games: The Role of Competition. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing 2003, Donald Marinelli (Ed.). Carnegie Mellon University, Schenley Park, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, 9.Google Scholar
- Leo Sang-Min Whang and Geun-Young Chang. 2004. Lifestyles of Virtual World Residents, Living in the on-line game, “Lineage”. In Proceedings. 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds, Tosiyasu L. Kunii, Seah Hock Soon, and Alexei Sourin(Eds.). IEEE Computer Society, Singapore, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBER.2003.1253430Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiming Wu, Pengtao Li, and Shashank Rao. 2008. Why They Enjoy Virtual Game Worlds? An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 9, 3 (2008), 219–229.Google Scholar
- Nick Yee. 2006. Motivations for Play in Online Games. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 9, 6 (2006), 772–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Yee and Nic Ducheneaut. 2019. Gamer Motivation Model Reference Sheets & Details (V2)., 9 pages. https://quanticfoundry.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Gamer-Motivation-Model-Reference.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Peter Zackariasson, Nils Wåhlin, and Timothy L. Wilson. 2010. Virtual Identities and Market Segmentation in Marketing in and Through Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOGs). Services Marketing Quarterly 31, 3 (2010), 275–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2010.486689Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- The Spheres of Player Motivation: Towards a New Typology for Player Motivation in Digital Games
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
The Spheres of Player Motivation: Understanding Players of Digital Games
CHI PLAY '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayUnderstanding player motivations is crucial for the games industry, as it empowers developers to improve how their games are designed. Each player is different and possesses their own motivations to play. Motivations can vary greatly, ranging from ...
The interplay between immersion and appeal in video games
A 2í 2 study on immersion and appeal of video games is presented.Immersion and appeal are found to be highly related.Immersion is found to be unaffected by playing experience.Appeal is found to be affected both by game played and playing experience. ...
Power-Ups in Digital Games: The Rewarding Effect of Phantom Game Elements on Player Experience
CHI PLAY '19: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayPower-ups are a type of game reward that allow the player to customise their experience by altering gameplay for a short period of time. Despite the wide use of power-ups in video games, little is known about their effect on gaming experiences. To ...
Comments